CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Class Racer Builds (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   '67 Camaro E/SA redo (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=50660)

Mark Yacavone 04-05-2015 02:31 PM

Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HandOverFist (Post 467069)
Are you saying it is more likely in the trans or convertor?

Back of the trans...Low roller sprag broken ...or more

Painter 04-05-2015 05:11 PM

Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
 
That sprag is the weak point of a 200. As long as you don't back up hard or up a big incline or use low gear in the pits or in the water box it lives very well. The water box may be the worst. It is a little tricky to do a burnout starting out in second, but 200's live very well if you take care of them. I send mine back to be freshened at 200-250 runs because I feel guilty. Paul Forte at Turbo Action builds an amazing transmission.

HandOverFist 04-05-2015 05:18 PM

Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Painter (Post 467086)
That sprag is the weak point of a 200. As long as you don't back up hard or up a big incline or use low gear in the pits or in the water box it lives very well. The water box may be the worst. It is a little tricky to do a burnout starting out in second, but 200's live very well if you take care of them. I send mine back to be freshened at 200-250 runs because I feel guilty. Paul Forte at Turbo Action builds an amazing transmission.

So you say using first to begin the burnout might be unwise with these 200's? I could easily adjust my procedure if that is the case. I've been told by several Stock racers I'm not near as hard on the car doing burnouts as they are and it appears they use first gear also.

Rich Biebel 04-05-2015 06:33 PM

Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
 
When I raced my LT-1 Firebird Stocker I manually shifted it and did burnouts starting in second gear and quickly shifting to third as soon as the tires spun. A local redid that trans that came with the car when I bought it as a roller. Trans never failed but case cracked for the next owner. 2.75 first gear 200 Trans

HandOverFist 04-05-2015 07:08 PM

Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
 
Just talked to Thomas and he agreed it was weird as well. I'll pull it and haul it to him shortly. ;)

HandOverFist 04-07-2015 01:31 AM

Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
 
Taking the trans to Thomas this week. Barring any problems the freshened Stocker engine is going back in the car and I will be at Bowling Green this Sunday for the first Combo race this year. :)

brent flynn 04-07-2015 09:51 PM

Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
 
you gonna try to make Indy, May1-3? Sorry you had some issues... im goin for testing/racing this Saturday...

brent flynn 04-07-2015 10:32 PM

Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
 
What's the entry for a combo race? Im considering coming down to that, if my track cant open... we've had so much rain, lately, the pits are too soggy... I think my car will run, but have no idea...hehe Its about 4 1/2-5 hrs tow...

HandOverFist 04-08-2015 01:11 AM

Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by brent flynn (Post 467299)
What's the entry for a combo race? Im considering coming down to that, if my track cant open... we've had so much rain, lately, the pits are too soggy... I think my car will run, but have no idea...hehe Its about 4 1/2-5 hrs tow...

If I remember correctly it's $50 total Brent. If Thomas is able to work me in by Friday I'll do my best to have everything together for Sunday. Like you I will be coming near blind as to how the engine will perform.

brent flynn 04-08-2015 08:49 PM

Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
 
IF my home track is too soggy, i may be able to go to INDY on Sunday, so not sure if i will make the tow...but im still thinkn about it... Is Bowling Green under water?? Ive heard it can flood out there...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.