Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
and this same "dusternash" was quick to ask me about my cars weight as if to imply "there's no way I could run within a gnats lash of what THAT Nova ran unless I was a lightweight" :D I've got a handful of 6 oh / 9.50 timeslips too:rolleyes: and "dusternash" if you're reading this ...I have no dry sump , no Liberty clutchless , 23 degree ( std ) heads and stud rockers:) |
Re: Econo Modified
Joe, you're dealing with someone who wouldn't know a real race car if it ran over him. You've won more rounds in one night, then he has in his career, and I don't even know you. Don't let it bother you, I've dealt with him, aunt Edna, and the Brady sisters for years. You learn to just roll with the punches.
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
|
Re: Econo Modified
I would love to see such class be developed; nevertheless, even if there if a spec cylinder head, I believe NHRA would not be interested monitoring them.
The reason I believe so, I have been told by a few people that NHRA is seriously considering allowing any cast iron cylinder head in SS/CS class. If this rule change takes effect, Chevy products will rule the class with the current aftermarket cast iron offerings such as the RHS Pro Action 14 degree cylinder heads, offering small chambers, big valves and the capability of the intake ports being ported to 300cc's of volume. The current utilized Ford N351 and Mopar W-2 heads cannot compete against the Chevy engine offerings and there are no equivalent aftermarket cast iron heads either for the Ford and Mopar applications. |
Re: Econo Modified
I don't believe they will allow the RHS head in, but who knows. RHS quit making them anyway in cast iron. But that goes back to my point. Why spend $10,000 on an induction system, just to have it outdated at a whim. You're making my point for me. There's always a head from one manufacturer, going back and forth from manufacturers, that has an advantage. The Brodix head fixes that. Why is that so hard for them to understand? What's the valve angle on the Ford head, and W2?
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
The cylinder heads are still available: http://www.racingjunk.com/Heads/1851...-400-CFM-.html The Ford N351 cylinder head has a 10 degree valve angle; the Mopar W2 comes in two versions; 15 and 18 degree. |
Re: Econo Modified
Randy,
To make your point about the Spec head... About a year ago I was at Brodix talking to Jeff and Mark about all the heads they produce. If I remember right Jeff said they had 54 different heads on their "Spec" list. They build them and provide all the checking fixtures to the associations or tracks. For them "Spec" is a big part of their business. I know they do a good job trying to provide equal heads because a few years ago I bought several sets of ASCS Spec heads that failed QC. They didn't flow the spec, they were high. I can't see why you pick a set of BB and Ford and SBC & Mopar to all make the same HP per Cu in and have a spec head for all. The Brodix spec head will work... |
Re: Econo Modified
Ya, you can buy the RHS head on different sites, but they have quit casting them. I did one 358 for a tractor puller friend, and they are quite a powerful head. I don't think they're anywhere near the GM 15 degree, but only messed with one set. Now, you're beginning to see the frustration of running ANY class. Would be SO nice to never have to worry about the latest, greatest head again. Adger, I think it is possible to make a big block head in spec, if that's what you mean, and have it allowed. Brodix ain't a bunch of idiots. Up at Knoxville they have a rep every year at the 360 nationals, and one year they had him examine the winners head, and he said, and I quote, "Hell, Ray Charles could see these heads are illegal."
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
|
Re: Econo Modified
Randy,
APBA already has a BB spec head, but the real challenge is to make all the different heads make close to the same hp per cu in. I think it would require head/manifold combinations to make things equal. |
Re: Econo Modified
Yes, or simply have 2 different classes in the same class, and index them properly. That would be easier. Also, we could police ourselves with a racers board. Would be way more legit anyway.
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
oops, I missed your reply SSDiv6. But, on the possible head rule changes allowing a 14° Pro Action head in SS/CS. If the NHRA wants it to become a 1 brand class, that will do it. |
Re: Econo Modified
Well, if true, all GM cars in SS\CS prepare to change heads. For a small update price of, say $13,000 to $18,000 dollars with intakes, heads, valves, pistons, cams, etc. And then get ready for the next step. Allowing aluminum heads in. Then for the small fee of $15,000 you can compete again! Ain't it grand! Should work out REAL GOOD!!!
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
|
Re: Econo Modified
Randy, If you really would like to keep it OLD SCHOOL and keep the word econo in this class, keep the the factory valve angles ( ie sbc 23 degree ). Inline wedge head only.
|
Re: Econo Modified
ALL spec heads are factory valve angle. Chevy, 23 degree, Ford, 20 degree, Mopar, 18 degree. Already been handled. You do know we are saying a single disc clutch, min. diameter at 10.5 inch, and NO computers. The right clutch, pressure plate, and fylwheel will be the key. There would be no counter wts. allowed. Clutch would be required to be engaged on ALL shifts. Just saying.
|
Re: Econo Modified
All right, was not sure about clutchless trans and clutch setup. How about wheelbase limitations and finalizing a lbs/ ci. Starting to think of an old C/SM car !
|
Re: Econo Modified
Ain't got that far yet, and actually ain't qualified to make the call on wheel base. Way over my pay grade! Ha!
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
|
Re: Econo Modified
Just curious. Why the 10 degree valve angle on the Ford, and the 15 degree valve angle on the Mopar? Thought they were 20 degree, and 18 degree respectively. I believe the vortec bowtie is still 23 degree.
|
Re: Econo Modified
I dont know about that Ford head that he mentions but there is a W2 15 degree head made for the oval / dirt track boys . I assume these heads are factory heads cast for a special racing niche. SHADY DELL SPEED was my point of reference for the 15 degree W2 heads.
|
Re: Econo Modified
The world has changed and here in the good old USA, we have too many that are on the entitlement line with the same crowd thinking everybody should be equal, life should be fair with no winners. More importantly to this discussion, we are no longer a car culture and all drag racing is on life support now, there are no new drivers in any great numbers building class cars to go drag racing and I would think bracket racing is seeing the majority of the few new drivers giving it a try. NHRA without question would have no interest in another spec class. So other than some local, maybe regional interest from a small group of old guys that have the coin to burn building a car for a class that has no appeal to the sanctioning body, track owners or fans our focus should be on promoting what we have/what we do. IMO, if the NHRA adds any class it should be a 10.5 class. This would put more fans in the seats which is what it was always about. Without that drag racing's future for my son's generation doesn't look promising.
|
Re: Econo Modified
Reading this thread has made me realize that the guy that came up with the PINKS idea wasn't as far off the wall as I thought he was.
|
Re: Econo Modified
as much as I didn't like the show or premise, which IMO, promoted street racing, it worked and got cars to the track I had never seen before and filled the stands with paying customers!
|
Re: Econo Modified
I here you loud and clear, Ed. Unfortunately, more and more people in the sport are coming to realize that maybe the NHRA is not the answer to their racing wants and needs. As you well know there are many ways to go racing and this is just ideas being thrown out there for people who would just like to run heads up all the time and keep the costs in line without a chance of being scrapped by the stroke of a pen.
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
On the W2 heads, there is a 18 degree for the OEM block and the 15 degree, which requires the Mopar racing block with the 48 degree lifter angle. Although the Bow Tie Vortec head retains the 23 degree valve angle, the head version being used is the large port with 235cc intake volume as cast. The N351 and W2 heads have as cast smaller volumes. However, the latest version of the 15 degree W2 head was redesigned and I have seen a cylinder head with a 2.08" intake and blended bowl with no additional porting flow 310 CFM @ 0.700" with a 190cc intake port. Based on the performance of Michael Mans when he raced in SS/CS with the Bow Tie Vortec head, I believe a well built Chevy engine with the Pro Action head and even with the cast iron LS-1 head is capable to run in the 8's at the right track. |
Re: Econo Modified
No, Wrong. Fair for everyone is bracket racing. Very boring, but fair. Spec head racing is affordable, and the chance of being competitive is fair. But still, at the end of the day, the guy who crosses the finish line first, is the winner.
you know you're actually racing, when you don't need clocks, and or computers to determine the winner. A win loss light would suffice. Ha! |
Re: Econo Modified
Good point on the heads SS. Was just curious was all. Not trying to stir anything up. Manns was an animal with the vortec, bowtie deal. I'll hand him that. But, at this rate, his stuff is already obsolete. My point again. Any manufacturer can keep producing a dominate head. So what? Proves nothing. Everyone playing on the exact same plane, proves a lot. There again, what's to stop GM or any others producing a killer head in cast iron, and peeing in everyone's post toasties?
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
Now behave yourself:D The NHRA REFUSES to think outside the bubble........and ultimately it will be their demise. The heads up and 10.5 stuff seems to always draw a crowd and apparently there's new blood in there all the time........at least based on the web sites I occasionaly roam thru. There is still plenty of interest in drag racing , considering the world we live in today and smart heads could exploit it. |
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
Talk to high school kids and you'll quickly find they have no interest in organized drag racing of any kind no mind any $ if they did. My son has been racing 7 years and not one of his friends, not one of his teammates in all these years have ever shown any interest or come to watch and find out what it's all about. Further, of all the kidsw that race jrs. each year for the past 21 years, few continue to race "big" cars after aging out for various reasons...college, trade school, military, full time job, marry, etc. but perhaps the number 1 reason is dad/mom are no longer paying the bill to build a car and race.;) Like the NHRA or not, it's their game and their rules, always has been and will continue to be until it's no more. |
Re: Econo Modified
I have heard the index classes of 11.50, 10.0 and 8.50 have gotten very popular here in the northeast. I know of new cars and some new players in them in the last year.
|
Re: Econo Modified
chris, the 11.50 and 10.0 index class are typically dominate by seasoned bracket racers. The 8.50 index classes are usually dominated by those that are well funded.
|
Re: Econo Modified
Well Ed , I guess its safe to say drag racing will probably endure for the remainder of our productive lives and as long as we have a place to play as long as we're interested , I suppose thats all that really matters in the end any way , after we go.....who cares......:D
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
Also, if NHRA approves the rule change for any aftermarket cast iron head, like said before, the class will be a Chevy engine class only. No aftermarket company will invest in creating a cast iron racing cylinder head for other makes in limited quantities when everybody prefers and easy to port and lightweight aluminum head. The Pro Action heads were developed in Australia and then acquired by RHS. The cast iron LS-1 was only available two years in GM trucks and the aftermarket racing LS cast iron block is actually a GM truck production block. All this said, this will force the Ford and Mopar products to race in the higher SS/Mod classes with aluminum heads, or race in the Super Modified class in Comp Eliminator. |
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
|
Re: Econo Modified
I did not know there was a cast iron LS head. If I was still pursuing SS\CS I would have looked at that hard, but the RHS head, I believe, has way more potential, and several CNC programs for it. The set we had flowed 368 at .800, and 263 on exhaust for the pulling tractor, and we reached almost 16 to 1 compression. And we didn't spend an arm, and a leg getting there. The best set of bowtie, phase 2's we had did 297, and 244 exhaust, and the best we did on compression was 12.6 to 1. And, I spent an arm and a leg.
|
Re: Econo Modified
Quote:
Strange Engineering will be sponsoring the Yellow Bullet Nationals that happen to take place the same weekend as Indy. Jeff Strange commented in Facebook that he will not be attending Indy for the first time since he was 16 years old. He believes sponsoring the Yellow Bullet Nationals he is closer to the Sportsman racers than attending Indy. This may set a trend on future of other manufacturers to support their real customer base; Sportsman racers. |
Re: Econo Modified
While I'm no fan of yellow bullet anything, it is far closer to NHRA's roots and what fans they have left.
|
Re: Econo Modified
To answer SS, I don't see how anyone wanting to change the rules is going to effect something with a board of racers making the call. I doubt there would be any money costing big changes ever. The most I see, would be figuring out different wt. breaks between auto, and clutch, and possibly newer vs. older chassis. By the way, anyone know if a 5 speed totally clutch assisted is faster then today's trick autos? Anyone?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.