Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
 

Mark, that is exactly the reason why I suggested the committee vote be non binding. The committee is merely a collection of representatives from the groups involved, the racers, the sponsors, and the manufacturers.

Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
 

Well, two things there. Wesley Roberson is an example of the type of person required to do the job, whether Wesley would take it or not. Make it Dave Ley, or Travis Miller if you want. If Wesley was actually allowed to do the job, he might consider taking it, especially if he were able to work with Len Imbrogno, and they were given a reasonable amount of freedom to do what was needed.

In any event, NHRA is not likely to do anything like what we suggest. We're merely posting "what if" scenarios.

Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
 

If you think NHRA will even look at a list like that, you are kidding yourself. I am trying to get some idea on lowering the HP for pre 2008 cars. Too many opinions on too many topics by too many people. This stuff on this thread is great reading, but then Mark Twain was too. We might get a couple items done, but a couple hundred items have no appeal to NHRA. I think we need to edit what we can, and not rewrite Tom Sawyer.

Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
 

Lowering the horsepower on the pre 2008 cars is a joke, and a waste of time. All it does is force all of the pre 2008 cars to constantly sand bag to protect the new lower HP ratings. It's ugly, for the racers, the fans, and the sponsors. The pre 2008 cars will be racing to 800 feet and dropping.

If you are not starting by either separating the factory race cars from the other cars, or at least forcing the HP ratings on the factory race cars to be far closer to being in line with the other cars, as well as never allowing them a pass on the AHFS when they race and qualify with the pre 2008 cars, then you are wasting your time, you will accomplish nothing.

And Jeff, there are twelve items on the list, not a hundred. The majority of them cost NHRA nothing, and have the potential to turn considerable additional profit for NHRA.

Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
 

[QUOTE=Alan Roehrich;445032]Lowering the horsepower on the pre 2008 cars is a joke, and a waste of time. QUOTE]

Agreed. Say there are four-hundred different engine combinations in active Stock Eliminator. Why de-rate 375-380 of them rather than fix the 20-25 that are severely wrong?

Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
 

Mike, it isn't even that, although that in itself is a good reason, especially since the majority of the pre 2008 combinations are in line, with the exception of a few hidden gems such as Larry Hill's truck or Paul Wong's truck. It's the factory race cars that are so far out of line.

The problem, as I mentioned above, is the fact that if you take 10% off of the pre 2008 cars, you create a situation where they now have to protect that factor, so every one of those cards will drop at 1000 feet, or sooner. You have all of those cars sand bagging on every pass. Further, the more popular combinations, in the more popular classes, will be right back where they were in 2 years or less.

Let's use our stuff as an example, although Kevin Cradduck may not return to class racing. We have two 69 Camaro race cars, one in Stock Eliminator, one in Super Stock (the car belongs to Scot LaMar). The well known orange car has run with a 427/425 since Pete Biondo drove it back 7-8 years ago. Right now, we have two other choices, the 396/375, which I can replace the current (broken) 427 with relatively easily, and the 427 ZL-1, which I could build at a cost of maybe $15K. So we have 3 combinations, two of which are very popular, and fast. Odds are, those two will return to their current rating quickly, and we're right back where we started.

The lesser known green car, we pretty much have the 396/375 that is in it right now. To run a 427/425, we'd have to rebuild the car, after building a new short block, so we're looking at $30K. To switch to a ZL-1, we're talking $50K at least. To run a 325 or 350 horse 396, I'd have to start with a clean piece of paper under the hood, so we're looking at $20K.

Of course, I can convert both cars to 4 speeds, which would thrill Scot LaMar and Jimmy Bridges I'm sure. For a cost of $7500 each.

In any case, odds are, everything we have would be back to the current HP rating in 1-2 years. In the mean time, I suppose we'd have to refine the art of dropping at 1000 feet.

The thing is, those combinations are decades old, and fairly well factored. Why would they need to be refactored, when they are not the problem?

The most simple, most cost effective, most long term, and cleanest solution is to put the factory race cars in their own classes. It works, it works immediately, and it continues to work for as long as the factories want to keep playing the game.

Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
 

[quote=Mike Carr;445034] FYI, according to my database, there are 2944 different engines listed in the classification guide prior to 2008 that have HP factors.

Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
 

It blows my mind that people want to re-invent the wheel..........

I'll say it one more time:

Put all of the Factory Shootout type cars into a setting which forces them to race heads up with each other with AHFS in place.......

Why destroy stock?????????????

This is so simple it boggles the mind.....

Self-interest is a running rampant through Stock Eliminator....

Stock was here before the Factory Shootout cars and I only hope that it can survive the Factory Shootout cars and the people that promote them...

Let the Factory Shootout cars race heads up, with AHFS in place and kill each other like what was done to the FI cars...

Am I the only person that sees this???????????????????

Bob

Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
 

I'm pretty sure these new cars were underfactored on purpose by NHRA and the manufacturers. This is not some sort of mistake that they are keen on fixing. I think a lot of upper class stocker guys should give serious consideration to converting their rides to Super Stock trim or even, dare I say it, Super Street.

Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
 

That's good , Bob .. You're right ..simple and obvious solution to that issue.

Only two more problems, easily fixed :

2, No new classes (besides the one in section three.) No new indexes
NO heads up runs anytime, anywhere,between FX and non FX cars for at least five years.

3, ALL FX cars run class (where stock class is run) as FX Combo. Stick and auto combined..
Now you have a Factory showcase where ever class is run .
At the most ,NHRA is out one more trophy .

Simple enough, Jeff?