Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2
If you are willing to write the check, it is the Easy Button. It's going to be a few years before most get enough HP to have to start thrashing headers, converters, camshafts, shocks, etc, to pick them up to be competitive in class or heads-ups.
I'm not near fast enough, and have three sets of headers (need another), three intake manifolds, five camshafts, had three converters, three transmissions (different ratios) and need to test one more rear gear. I can go 1.05 under in the heat if I need to, and am dead meat in a heads-up against one of those things. Probably against Gary Emmons too. LOL |
Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2
[quote=Jim Kaekel;372966]
Quote:
|
Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2
[quote=Sean Cour;372984]
Quote:
|
Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2
Quote:
(Don't forget to include the price of a real 442 that is in at least very good condition) |
Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2
I guess it's like when you see someone at the supermarket buying steak and shrimp on food stamp cards and paying for all their beer and cigs with their own money, then getting into their Beamer in the front row handy capped spot (even though clearly they are not handy capped). Some people will applaud them for gaming the system, others will call them no good pieces of crap. I don't care what they do either way. I wasn't brought up like that, and I'm certainly not teaching my kids to live like that. We are all free to live and race the way we think is correct. I believe that sandbagging a half a second when "we haven't even pulled the valve covers off yet" is just like the food stamp Beamer driver, but I'm not going to call you a no good piece of crap because I don't agree with your stance on it.
|
Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2
Quote:
|
Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2
Quote:
|
Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2
Quote:
|
Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2
I guess I missed the statement that I made that said I sided with either side. But as mentioned before, Im not the brightest lightbulb in the lamp. I just dont understand how people can choose a car that is in the rule books and everyone has a problem with it. The new cars dont complain about having to wait at the tree for over 4 seconds at times.
Im also not sure how you can compair people getting over on the goverment and people who have found the area of a rule book that works for them. Usually the ones parking in the handicap spots, drive the benz's, and do the other stuff you listed are also one's complaing when their check that they say is "owed" to them is a day late. They also complain because some one else is doing better than them in life and they arent treated fair. This list could go one. Last I checked we ("new car guys that is") do not get anything from the goverment, nor do we expect people to just give us everything. We work just as hard at our jobs as we do on our race cars so we have CASH to buy whatever we need. We don't need a hand out. Honestly you can call me whatever you like. If its wasnt in the rule books then we wouldnt be racing it. Im not going to get in a pissing match about how i was raised and yadda-yadda. We are not cheating, we are playing by the guidlines we ALL were giving. Yall choose to race what yall want and so do we. Dont worry Hagan im not going to call you names or try to bash you. Glad to see your out racing again this year! Good Luck |
Re: Average year for the 10 @ LORDS2-2
Nobody has any problems with how much money somebody else has, just the bogus low hp factors. That is NHRA's doing. Not yours. Doesn't make anybody like to race new cars heads up any better.
Btw, Jeff is one of my absolute favorite people to visit with at the track. Really good guy. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.