Re: Junior Stock vs IHRA Pure Stock
Quote:
AND I will talk to Mike Baker he is a thoughtful person. A while back made a suggestion about Certified Cams and Springs and Engines to simpify Tear down. Suggested a roving Tear Down Specialist go to specific meeting places to Seal and Certifiy cars as legal. This would improve race day efficiencies and more people would be modivated to set national records. Mine got burried but still aiming to make one. FWIW I drive not tow my car to all the races. It is Street Legal and sometimes passes emmisions. Have to retune it but it will pass with the Bullet PS Cam. Yeah it does have a Yank converter with Lock up. In fact with street radials, using Belsteins it makes a great Autocross car. In that sense I am meeting the concept of a Street can become racer. Cost are lower than most racer, mileage near 20mpg, small foot print at the racetrack, do have to be fit to change tires. The trunk is so big I can carry everything I need to race. I get the fact that Stock is a bigger tire, valve trane and cam to Super Stock. The fact that prepared Factory Hotrods can be bought race ready again, except this time it is not a (wink wink) hidden secret. I think IHRA has thoughtfully considered what Stock today should be. Like the fact you can put a V8 in a Vega or Maverick. Smart moves to expand the base of cars over the more popular cars like Camaro and Mustangs. I wrote a full page opinion in Super Stock Drag Illustrated way back when about Stock and updating the class for the future. Interesting IHRA probably already thinking in that direction did 90% of what I suggested. Dan BTW I thank you for opinion you are giving me valid feedback. |
Re: Junior Stock vs IHRA Pure Stock
Quote:
|
Re: Junior Stock vs IHRA Pure Stock
Good luck Dan. ANYTHING that would make more racers jump in with both feet would be a help. Factory stock or Pure stock has been pretty dead after all that was done in the years past to satisfy the players. Nothing much seemed to help bring in more entries. Like the idea of certified cams as tear down for a cam check is a pain in the butt.
|
Re: Junior Stock vs IHRA Pure Stock
Quote:
Nice looking rig Brent ! I've always liked that body style Chevy Duallie. Here's my outfit for next year for the 2-3 day events. Paid 2500 for the truck and 3500 for the lightweight slide-in camper. http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s...g18pics002.jpg |
Re: Junior Stock vs IHRA Pure Stock
Hello X-tech welcome back.......I am a fan but I like this idea of pure stock. How about a street stock for division level based on the legal street races they have on Friday nights. Car has to be street legal to state laws just a dial in so you won't have to have major teardown and inspections. That may bring in the younger car crowd and older guys that don't want to chase the major races.
|
Re: Junior Stock vs IHRA Pure Stock
Quote:
|
Re: Junior Stock vs IHRA Pure Stock
Quote:
|
Re: Junior Stock vs IHRA Pure Stock
Quote:
Just think IHRA needs new blood and should consider adding European and Asian built cars to the mix. Considering the volume of these vehicles sold. Toyota trucks have a US like OHV engine in their trucks. Be cool if the offered it in one of their RWD sedans. It was be a good launching point and bring more cars to the races. May spurn a more local Stock racing. Getting any car prepared should take a few mods to run near the index. Not suppose to be so easy as to buy a car and then go to the races and be competive. Heck every car maker already has a Bolt On Mods market. Which is the nature of Pure Stock. Sure would bolster the aftermarket to meet this new demand. Kind of like X-Mans idea of the Factory Stock concept vs Pure Stock. Just somehow think that PS is the wrong term to use.... Hense going back to the Junior Stock term.. Factory Stock seems to me a better fit. The thing is that if IHRA wants to compete for Drag Racing space they need to think how to attract racers away from NHRA. Or attract racers that NHRA ignores and without creating another class. Simplification of the Tear Down process is key. NHRA makes it draconian. Certification and Verification of Parts. Go back to Street Gasoline, eliminate having to store race gas. If you want to set a record..ok use the Race gas. Make racing more fun...instead of a drudgery. Dan |
Re: Junior Stock vs IHRA Pure Stock
Quote:
Just a couple thoughts here. First you would need to expand the class or add more weight breaks. That was my original intent with our FWD Olds, it misses the lowest weight break. The class needs to encompass the same weight breaks "Stock" has to allow the broadest range of participation. Next would be to look at the current rules and determine what changes could be made that would make sense from not only a cost perspective but a common sense perspective as well. I'd personally like to see the muffler rule "with headers", done away with. Unless the intent with this is to be a street car driven to the track class? I like the concept of Pure Stock. Just like regular "Stock", it favors the faster RWD cars. |
Re: Junior Stock vs IHRA Pure Stock
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.