CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Points for Qualifying and Records (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=43170)

Billy Nees 09-14-2012 09:45 AM

Re: Points for Qualifying and Records
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeFicacci (Post 346508)
Ultimately, I believe a points system for qualifying (and records) will help the AHFS work more quickly.

I'll agree with that!

Tony Janes 09-14-2012 04:00 PM

Re: Points for Qualifying and Records
 
Barton has the right answer.

Glenn Briglio 09-14-2012 05:30 PM

Re: Points for Qualifying and Records
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeFicacci (Post 346508)
Based on Fred Johnston's logic, we should basically get rid of all performance in the class and make it a bracket race. According to Fred's logic, we should probably get rid of heads up runs completely.

There are a few guys, especially on the west coast who run "maxed out" 69 Camaros 396/375 and can put in on the poll at just about any race that they want to.

Ultimately, I believe a points system for qualifying (and records) will help the AHFS work more quickly.

Hey Mike got nothing to do but stir the pot up. LOL. A very good idea , let's get back to a performance class instead of a bracket race class.

Paul Merolla 09-14-2012 05:48 PM

Re: Points for Qualifying and Records
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by billy nees (Post 346509)
i'll agree with that!

x3!!!

Ed Fernandez 09-14-2012 06:49 PM

Re: Points for Qualifying and Records
 
Who the **** is Fred Johnson?Oh he's the no name no car owning/driving instigator who slides out from under his rock to annoy S/SS racers.
It would be nice to see performance back in the eliminator.If I was still active I wouldn't have a problem with the proposed system.My car wasn't competitive in class anyway.That didn't affect me in the eliminator.It might have a bit of an impact in the upper classes.But some things just aren't for the masses.

Alan Roehrich 09-14-2012 06:58 PM

Re: Points for Qualifying and Records
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by David Barton (Post 346502)
You just proved my point, that is complicated. NHRA would read into about 3 sentences and say, "next".

Here is another problem with the record idea, but I have a solution. Since car counts in Division 1 are so high, they give you a limited amount of chances to actually set a record compared to other divisions. Each divisional director has there own view on how records should be set, and trust me Division 1 is the hardest by far.

Solution: Let anyone set a record at any time, its simple.


David, don't read the explanation, all you need to read is the four rules which are not complicated.

20 points for setting a national record.
No points for re-setting your own record.
Maximum of records in 3 classes per driver per year.
Records in only one car/engine combination per year.


Four simple one sentence rules, no wiggle room, no problems.

Any one sentence rule in the rule book can have a paragraph or more of clarification behind it, if someone asks for clarification.

MikeFicacci 09-14-2012 07:01 PM

Re: Points for Qualifying and Records
 
I think some guys are taking the idea to the extreme but it seems most of us are in agreement that this is a good idea. What would have to be done for implementation? Does NHRA actually care?

This is what I was thinking.

Qualifications

#1 10 points
#2 5 points
#3 3 points
#4 2 points
#5 1 point

Records

Record Set 10 points
- Can't set the same record more than twice in a year
- Record must be .75 under the index or greater

I think that's pretty simple and a fair place to start.

RULER 09-14-2012 07:26 PM

Re: Points for Qualifying and Records
 
LOOK UP TOOL in the dictionary, SEE Fred Johnston, In his world the basket at a basket ball game would be lowered to 6ft and you would use a softball, he has never had a positive POST!!! and he will pick on old cars too. And nobody seems to no if he has a race car?, Did i miss anything.

Paul Wong 09-14-2012 07:46 PM

Re: Points for Qualifying and Records
 
This sounds like a good plan. I would have incentive to put an "R" on the window and run some of my old heaps hard. There is no way the whining clan will let any more emphasis put on performance even though it is a performance based class.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeFicacci (Post 346601)
I think some guys are taking the idea to the extreme but it seems most of us are in agreement that this is a good idea. What would have to be done for implementation? Does NHRA actually care?

This is what I was thinking.

Qualifications

#1 10 points
#2 5 points
#3 3 points
#4 2 points
#5 1 point

Records

Record Set 10 points
- Can't set the same record more than twice in a year
- Record must be .75 under the index or greater

I think that's pretty simple and a fair place to start.


Ed Carpenter 09-14-2012 11:11 PM

Re: Points for Qualifying and Records
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeFicacci (Post 346601)
I think some guys are taking the idea to the extreme but it seems most of us are in agreement that this is a good idea. What would have to be done for implementation? Does NHRA actually care?

This is what I was thinking.

Qualifications

#1 10 points
#2 5 points
#3 3 points
#4 2 points
#5 1 point

Records

Record Set 10 points
- Can't set the same record more than twice in a year
- Record must be .75 under the index or greater

I think that's pretty simple and a fair place to start.

Mike I said it in my first post. Talking on here won't get anything done. Everyone needs to write,email,call etc NHRA expressing their opinion on this subject. If only a few do it then you can forget it. If NHRA gets 200 emails about it then maybe something will happen. Also I mentioned our division reps. They could help with this. My .02 Ed


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.