Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Alan, I agree that it would be in competition race car wise, but Pinks is in competition with them with the fans. Just look at how many people go and watch this show, there are as many at Pinks watching as there are at a National event on Sunday. Am I wrong?:):rolleyes::eek::o:D
After thinking about what I posted and after reading it I have made no sence,I think I have breathed in to many paint fumes today. I guess what I was trying to say is that Pinks is in competition with them and they are letting them put on their show at affiliated tracks and that I did not think it would be a problem with some one else doing the same thing just in another format but I'm probably wrong. |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Hey Frank
We'll throw them some beer, courtesy from " The Brew Crew " maybe some salted peanuts if there nice to us. lol |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Frank
OK we'll wet there beaks really good, but not too much, we don't want to spoil them. Frank, i'm just throwing ideas out there, you & anyone else can help with the formalities. WE NEED HELP WITH THE PRIZE LIST.............. Remember, Us Linden Guys got to stick together !!!!!!!!! CLASS RACERS ASSOCIATION, this is our future....... Pistol Pete |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
Good point but it raises another question: Would NHRA/IHRA let us run on the tracks they have contracts with or control. If we are competing against them where would we be allowed race? Track owners would not want to take the chance of losing contracts with the HRA's by hosting our races....just something to think about! |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Just to let you know that we are still working on things. Its a slow process.
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
i think it is great to let the mods and modified stock run comp. with real indexes of course. we will support you!
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
About the name... If you google CRA you get many organizations including oval track racers. If you search IHRA you can as the 1st hit find the International Harm Reduction ***. As an organization that is in its infancy, we will be competing against many groups. Since the internet is here to stay, all attempts should be made to allow the search engine to pull up this group with no confusion. The goal is to GGRRROOOWWW. This means racers and more importantly spectators. Last minute what to do today or this weekend should be a painless search. High car counts + high spectator counts = More sponsors and $!
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
Robert, I googled AHRA and as of 2006 they were still in business as an association, racing at only one track....Seattle, we would probably have to pay someone to use that moniker. I raced in the old AHRA and it always had a family feeling not like the cattle call NHRA. Jim |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
The only suggestion I have is to add one more class to put V/S, and CF/S together (.10 difference), and place V/SA & DF/S (also .10 difference), in its own class. There may now become an oddlot number of classes, but at least they would be closer together (like the faster classes), and the low qualifier could get the bye run into the first round, while the best package would get the bye for subsequent rounds? |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
1. Brad Pierce 2. Randy Hyman 3. Bill Owen 4. Steve Pohill 5. Dennis Chapman 6. Jim Wahl 7. Nichole Stephenson 8. The Minnesota Neon 9. Russ Abrams 10. Myself--Gary Hampton 11. Stan Kopejtka 12. Bill Howell 13. Skip Loeffler That's it as I can best recall of last seasons racers...any others out there? Speak up.... |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Divided by 7 divisions is 2 per division or possible ? per area nationals divided by number of classes....= bye runs for class..
Not being negative but if an organization is to be developed to support CLASS racing one of its moves should be to lay out a plan to consolidate classes so Classes could have competition anywhere in the country they were contested. That would be hard decisions to make or what would have been gained? Positive suggestion start as is and consolidate per 6 months... |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
Adjust this, drop that, It seems to me the stuff you are plotting makes glendora look like childs play. I've said it before and I'm sure I'll say it again. If you want a totally level playing field go race heavy eliminator or nostagia race. And leave the the perfomance backed stuff to others. How about you can't win class unless you have competition in your class. That would get rid of most of the FWD cars!!!!!! HAPPY???????? PS in SS there are Ron Sebelnick, Tim Kish, Myself and some others under consturction. All in the same class |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
I get it.
Like I said just don't offer contingency to "ANYONE" that doesn't have another car in their class. Sounds simple to me. Or are you "WORRIED" about offending some of your "PALS". This "BS" about FWD has gone on long enough they have had classes for them for over 25 years, like it or not they are "HERE TO STAY" Everyone on here has been saying the reason the companies don't want to get involved is the "VIG" nhra charges not the numbers of classes. Maybe you should get Tim Gietner to be in chanrge of your "new association" |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Also I've just about heard enough about "their is more fun in it when their are more cars in the class"
I believe the only ones having fun are the ones having "FUN" are those that are winning or capable of winng the class. The others are just there for the bracket race. In todays "mentality" if you had less classes "the few" would spend more money and dominate them anyway. Or do you still live in the utopian world where hard work and sweat can "trump" money. If you do take a look at the pro classes and see how many of them started as sportsman racers!!!!!! |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Interesting reading for guys thinking NHRA can't do without us. Not sure how I found this, was doing a serch for something else, reflects my thoughts exactly. From our friend Chuck Norton. Echos what an NHRA official of mine and also racetrack ownner I knows says.
http://mysite.verizon.net/res6wsqy/id3.html |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
Chuck is absolutely right, but I thought the deal was to make our own association. I don't believe it was stated anywhere that we were out to hurt the HRS's only find a niche of our own. This could still be done while running in the HRA's by having our own races BUT I do believe that if Bud will pull out how long will it be before other sponsors follow suit and how long will it be before contingency money can't be afforded anymore. I believe we are going to see big cutbacks coming to our sport and the classes that are going to suffer are going to be the ones that the fans don't care about watching.......how many people are in the stands when you race! Jim |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Wow........The pen is still mightier than the sword. Chuck is right on.
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Too many cooks in the kitchen here. Why not let these people set this up their way, do what they think is right. when they have everything finalized look at what they have to offer and decide whether or not you wish to participate or not. Seems simple to me, not too many people are willing to put what I know is alot of effort into something like this so please let all the details be figured out before all the crying begins. Seems as though some are wanting to put the cart in front of the horse, let's see what these gentlemen have to offer before we try to change it Just my opinion. Joe P.S. some time ago it was voiced that racers were unhappy with the way they were treated by the HRA's. I believe this is what these guys are trying to provide us an" alternative"
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
i agree. what ever rules they make i will adapt to, as long as it is not dial in.
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Terry:
If you want to do what we talked about forget about getting everybodies opinion and do what you think is right. Set up the organization tell everyone what you have planned then see how many members you can get to join the organization. If everyone keeps whinning and moaning as usual tell them just what you said above and FORGET IT. If not enough racers want to do something better than what they have now at least you tried. Then let them moan and groan and laugh at them because they can't see beyond their own personal interest and wants. |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Chuck's article dead on, and I saw no "leftist" spin! Keep up the good work Chuck. When you start to spin left, we will all be watching. ;)
Terry, I 100% support the combining of classes, 1.0 weight brakes where ever it makes sense combining automatics and sticks, too. It can be done. I was at the Dutch classic year before last and there were a bunch of GTDA cars. It was way cool. Art, Even though it is impossible to be perfect, why wouldnt we strive for a level playing field? Isnt that the whole point? |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
.Or Would you just say "have a nice day, now get lost"? In a performance based eliminator it is impossible to have a completely level playing field (unless you just run heavy elim) Years of racing and rule changes have leveled it quite a bit. Ihra has way more classes than nhra so why not bash them the way you bash nhra. Or is that politically incorrect? |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
One of the reasons,I believe, the sanctioning bodies have slipped away from the sportsman racer and real performance in the classes is they were once an organization built by racers for the racers. We now have alot of people making rules ect. about racing that know nothing about racing. I would hope that anything new for us goes back to the racer for the racer format. All the input here should be by the people that it will directly affect. Just my 2 cents.
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
1. The Camaro racer who raced me in the first round of the '98 Mile High's...he caught me around the 800-1000ft mark, and clicked his motor off so as to coast across the finish line ahead of me. However, the big Winston Vision screen showed me pulling on him because I refused to lift just because he passed me, and I took the stripe by .003!!! I wonder how much crow that guy was eating the rest of that day??? 2. Even though Ryan McClanahan & Scott Burton were the finalist's at the '06 Mile High's, it was my fwd Cavalier that had the best package of eliminations (.006), by virtue of running a 16.664 on my 16.66 index/dial, and having a .002rt against my friend Tony Hernandez's '65 Corvette 327V8 11sec. machine. I wish I could rewind my race with Ryan in the quarters, because I had a perfect cool down for my car after the race with Tony, but I was starting to feel light-headed and needed water. Much to my dismay, just as I drove the 1/2 mile back to the north-40 of Bandimere, they called me to the lanes and I warmed my plenum too much, which slowed the car down .13. I know that some who read this will say that excuses are like ..........., but since he crossed the line only .014 over his dial, and came by me pretty fast, I'm certain I would've broke him out if I stayed cooler...I wish for a rematch!!! |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
Quote:
|
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
It's getting a little personal now.Maybe it's time to put a fork in it.
Ed F. Just an innocent bystander |
Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
You know Terry I avoid calling anyone a liar at all costs, so I will just let others make up their own minds on this one. So you are just out for FWD competitors own good huh? Make it easier for them to win you say? Then why did you post this in the H.A.M.B. forum? Hummmm?
"Well it sounds good for old guys like us and I started the "Pure stock" class in IHRA years ago when I worked for them for 22 years with basicly the same rules except unfortunatly its open for the newer cars also. There is so much bitching and complaining any more that Im having my doubts that I will continue with a sportsman association. If it does come to be then the "pure stock" class will be included with a name change to "Jr. Stock" and maybe limit the year to 1971 max. Right now the catagory starts at 8 lbs per HP and goes 15 lbs per HP in full lb breaks (8, 9, 10, 11, etc.. If you read the comments on the racers forum then you know what I'm talking about. The FWD (slugs) cars a joke when it comes to spectator intrest." Thank you once again for proving my point Terry. I think I speak for all FWD competitors, Please,don't do us any favors. Insert fork now. Jim |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.