CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   "WHAT IF" part 4 (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=16208)

Mark Yacavone 03-09-2009 12:51 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 109265)
The races with a CIC like comp was for the "Quick 32" in stock and S/S. The regular eliminators would be run as it is now in NHRA and IHRA.

The Quick 32 in 2001, was an all out race . I believe the CIC trigger should be atleast 1.15 under, if you are going to change the format.

X-TECH MAN 03-09-2009 02:34 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone (Post 109266)
The Quick 32 in 2001, was an all out race . I believe the CIC trigger should be atleast 1.15 under, if you are going to change the format.

Yes the 2001 race was all out but Alex mentioned running the new series with a CIC for the quick 32. I probably mislead that in my prior quote. I dont know what the plan is for the "trigger" yet.

Trevor Weiss 03-10-2009 08:59 AM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Alan, I agree that it would be in competition race car wise, but Pinks is in competition with them with the fans. Just look at how many people go and watch this show, there are as many at Pinks watching as there are at a National event on Sunday. Am I wrong?:):rolleyes::eek::o:D

After thinking about what I posted and after reading it I have made no sence,I think I have breathed in to many paint fumes today. I guess what I was trying to say is that Pinks is in competition with them and they are letting them put on their show at affiliated tracks and that I did not think it would be a problem with some one else doing the same thing just in another format but I'm probably wrong.

Frank Bialas 03-10-2009 08:35 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pistol Pete (Post 109196)
Robert Swartz:

I did forget about the GT Stock, Crate Motor Class & The Pure Stock Classes. My Mistake.

We can add them in too, no problem. But did you get the idea that I was trying to come up with ??

Just trying to lessen the classes. Run Class run offs with less classes, like Jeff Lee said.

How 'bout the entry fee, say it's $160. for arguements sake, take $100. a car & put it towards Class Elim.
Money, the other $60. goes towards the Handicap Elim. Money.
Say your running the A & B Class and 22 cars show up, take the 22 cars times $100. = $2200.
I don't know if you want to pay winner & runner up or what.??? we need help in this area.

The other $60. goes towards the "Handicap Elim". money pay out. if you had 32 total classes x $60.
that comes out to $1920.

Just trying to come up with ideas on a payout system.

What'dya think Terry

Pistol Pete
1374 Stock

Hey Pete, looks like there's no pie left for the TRACK, don't they get a slice?

Pistol Pete 03-10-2009 08:53 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Hey Frank

We'll throw them some beer, courtesy from " The Brew Crew " maybe some salted peanuts if there
nice to us. lol

Frank Bialas 03-10-2009 09:31 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pistol Pete (Post 109497)
Hey Frank

We'll throw them some beer, courtesy from " The Brew Crew " maybe some salted peanuts if there
nice to us. lol

OK !!!! LET THE BASH BEGIN!!!! COUNT THE BREW CREW IN!!!! TELL THEM TO BRING THEIR OWN NUTZ!!!! and maybe you could adjust the crews entry fee to offset the cost of the beer. YOU GOTTA WET DA BEAK!!!! you know the old saying everybody's got a cup , but no one is chipping in!!

Pistol Pete 03-11-2009 05:14 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Frank

OK we'll wet there beaks really good, but not too much, we don't want to spoil them.

Frank, i'm just throwing ideas out there, you & anyone else can help with the formalities.

WE NEED HELP WITH THE PRIZE LIST..............

Remember, Us Linden Guys got to stick together !!!!!!!!!


CLASS RACERS ASSOCIATION, this is our future.......


Pistol Pete

treessavoy 04-02-2009 10:32 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 109177)
Trevor, Pinks is not actually directly competing with either NHRA or IHRA, the new association would certainly be considered to be in direct competition with both.


Good point but it raises another question: Would NHRA/IHRA let us run on the tracks they have contracts with or control. If we are competing against them where would we be allowed race?

Track owners would not want to take the chance of losing contracts with the HRA's by hosting our races....just something to think about!

X-TECH MAN 04-03-2009 07:08 AM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Just to let you know that we are still working on things. Its a slow process.

randy wilson 04-03-2009 07:48 AM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
i think it is great to let the mods and modified stock run comp. with real indexes of course. we will support you!

House of Darts 04-03-2009 09:36 AM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
About the name... If you google CRA you get many organizations including oval track racers. If you search IHRA you can as the 1st hit find the International Harm Reduction ***. As an organization that is in its infancy, we will be competing against many groups. Since the internet is here to stay, all attempts should be made to allow the search engine to pull up this group with no confusion. The goal is to GGRRROOOWWW. This means racers and more importantly spectators. Last minute what to do today or this weekend should be a painless search. High car counts + high spectator counts = More sponsors and $!

treessavoy 04-03-2009 10:25 AM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Swartz (Post 109163)
Or maybe that's it. Revive the AHRA under a new brand. That's an interesting question, if someone does still hold the rights to that name? I always thought they had the neatest decal anyway. I had an old AHRA t-shirt, wore that thing till it became nothing but a faded rag, LOL! Still have it in a paper bag upstairs somewhere.

I think that's it, BRING BACK the AHRA!!!!!!

Robert Swartz


Robert,

I googled AHRA and as of 2006 they were still in business as an association, racing at only one track....Seattle, we would probably have to pay someone to use that moniker.

I raced in the old AHRA and it always had a family feeling not like the cattle call NHRA.

Jim

GarysZ24 04-04-2009 05:52 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pistol Pete (Post 109067)
Terry Bell

I think to have our own Assocation would be great. I like UCRA - United Class Racers Assocation.

I also like Jeff Lee's comment on combine classes, Stick with Auto's & combining A,B&C - D,E&F, ect.
I came up with a different plan. See if anyone out there likes this idea.

I only did this for Stock Elim. I broke down all of the NHRA classes into 16 classes by combining them
of course. OK
1. AA stick & auto same index
2. A & B 3 tenths difference in indexs, so add wt. or take out wt. to make it even.
3. C & D 2 tenths difference.
4. E & F 2 tenths difference.
5. G & H .25 hundreds diff.
6. I & J .25 diff.
7. K & L .15 diff.
8. M,N&O 3 tenths diff.
9. P/S & P/SA is the same index.
10. Q/S - Q/SA & A/FS 2 tenths diff.
11. R/S & R/SA 1 tenth diff.
12. T/S & T/SA same index
13. U/S - U/SA & B/FS 2 tenths diff.
14. V/S -V/SA- C&D/FS .45 hundreds diff. ( this is the only class with a big index gap ) suggestions ?
15. W/S & W/SA .25 hundreds diff.
16. E/FS class by itself

How i would run this would be: Run these for Class Elim's on Saturday & the 16 Winners go into the Handicap Style Elim. for Sunday. Payout's, we could use some ideas. Anyone ?????
I'm sure you could do the same for Super Stock using the index formula. Different Class, Same Index =
1 Class, ect....
I would really like some payout ideas. I'll try & do 1 today.

UCRA is the future for us Class Racers...

Sincerely
"Pistol" Pete Dutko
1374 Stock

Hey Pete,

The only suggestion I have is to add one more class to put V/S, and CF/S together (.10 difference), and place V/SA & DF/S (also .10 difference), in its own class. There may now become an oddlot number of classes, but at least they would be closer together (like the faster classes), and the low qualifier could get the bye run into the first round, while the best package would get the bye for subsequent rounds?

GarysZ24 04-04-2009 06:19 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 109136)
One question.....How many FWD cars exist today across the country anyway????

My first guess would be 12-20 (on the NHRA side that is). I only can think of myself and these guys (cars):
1. Brad Pierce
2. Randy Hyman
3. Bill Owen
4. Steve Pohill
5. Dennis Chapman
6. Jim Wahl
7. Nichole Stephenson
8. The Minnesota Neon
9. Russ Abrams
10. Myself--Gary Hampton
11. Stan Kopejtka
12. Bill Howell
13. Skip Loeffler

That's it as I can best recall of last seasons racers...any others out there? Speak up....

Dick Butler 04-04-2009 07:26 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Divided by 7 divisions is 2 per division or possible ? per area nationals divided by number of classes....= bye runs for class..
Not being negative but if an organization is to be developed to support CLASS racing one of its moves should be to lay out a plan to consolidate classes so Classes could have competition anywhere in the country they were contested.
That would be hard decisions to make or what would have been gained?
Positive suggestion start as is and consolidate per 6 months...

X-TECH MAN 04-05-2009 07:27 AM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GarysZ24 (Post 113041)
My first guess would be 12-20 (on the NHRA side that is). I only can think of myself and these guys (cars):
1. Brad Pierce
2. Randy Hyman
3. Bill Owen
4. Steve Pohill
5. Dennis Chapman
6. Jim Wahl
7. Nichole Stephenson
8. The Minnesota Neon
9. Russ Abrams
10. Myself--Gary Hampton
11. Stan Kopejtka
12. Bill Howell
13. Skip Loeffler

That's it as I can best recall of last seasons racers...any others out there? Speak up....

You forgot Mike Carr in Div. 1 Penn. area.

Paul Merolla 04-05-2009 07:32 AM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 113058)
You forgot Mike Carr in Div. 1 Penn. area.

And Art Leong...

X-TECH MAN 04-05-2009 08:12 AM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Merolla (Post 113059)
And Art Leong...

I should have said "STOCK" elim. FWD cars for this list. After that how many FWD Super Stock ? cars in the country??? Probably less !

art leong 04-05-2009 12:23 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 109136)
Might go with ONE pound wt breaks instead of 1/2 lb breaks to further reduce the number of classes in both stock and super stock. Have to add a 6 and 7 lb wt break for the GT S/Sers to give the Hemi, T-Bolts, and Hi HP Corvettes some competition. The slight wt. break might work well to combine GT and traditional Super stockers????? Maybe some wt. break for the lower class automatic stockers and super stockers also. The main thing is there are way to many classes. The manufactures cannot pay for class win for all these different classes in this economy. Why do you think that a class win money has been going down and it isnt worth much even at Indy? All would still run the eliminator on Sunday anyway....not just class winners. Just thinking out loud. One question.....How many FWD cars exist today across the country anyway????

ARE YOU GUYS TRYING TO SET UP A NEW ASSOCIATION??????
Adjust this, drop that, It seems to me the stuff you are plotting makes glendora look like childs play.
I've said it before and I'm sure I'll say it again. If you want a totally level playing field go race heavy eliminator or nostagia race. And leave the the perfomance backed stuff to others.
How about you can't win class unless you have competition in your class. That would get rid of most of the FWD cars!!!!!! HAPPY????????
PS in SS there are Ron Sebelnick, Tim Kish, Myself and some others under consturction. All in the same class

John Kelley 04-05-2009 12:32 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chipper Chapman (Post 108365)
Any thoughts of coming into Canada eh?

You mean where they can't sell RACING GAS ???

X-TECH MAN 04-05-2009 02:19 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by art leong (Post 113083)
ARE YOU GUYS TRYING TO SET UP A NEW ASSOCIATION??????
Adjust this, drop that, It seems to me the stuff you are plotting makes glendora look like childs play.
I've said it before and I'm sure I'll say it again. If you want a totally level playing field go race heavy eliminator or nostagia race. And leave the the perfomance backed stuff to others.
How about you can't win class unless you have competition in your class. That would get rid of most of the FWD cars!!!!!! HAPPY????????
PS in SS there are Ron Sebelnick, Tim Kish, Myself and some others under consturction. All in the same class

You just dont get it...............there are just TO MANY CLASSES for the manufacturer,s to pay class win money. The show as it is right now is nothing more than a bracket race to spectators. Im not saying this will be done but SOMETHING has to be done or its nothing more but the same old crap like NHRA and IHRA and the spectators dont give a S##T about it.

art leong 04-05-2009 05:18 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
I get it.
Like I said just don't offer contingency to "ANYONE" that doesn't have another car in their class.
Sounds simple to me.
Or are you "WORRIED" about offending some of your "PALS".
This "BS" about FWD has gone on long enough they have had classes for them for over 25 years, like it or not they are "HERE TO STAY"
Everyone on here has been saying the reason the companies don't want to get involved is the "VIG" nhra charges not the numbers of classes.
Maybe you should get Tim Gietner to be in chanrge of your "new association"

art leong 04-05-2009 05:33 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Also I've just about heard enough about "their is more fun in it when their are more cars in the class"
I believe the only ones having fun are the ones having "FUN" are those that are winning or capable of winng the class. The others are just there for the bracket race.
In todays "mentality" if you had less classes "the few" would spend more money and dominate them anyway.
Or do you still live in the utopian world where hard work and sweat can "trump" money.
If you do take a look at the pro classes and see how many of them started as sportsman racers!!!!!!

Ed Wright 04-05-2009 06:20 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Interesting reading for guys thinking NHRA can't do without us. Not sure how I found this, was doing a serch for something else, reflects my thoughts exactly. From our friend Chuck Norton. Echos what an NHRA official of mine and also racetrack ownner I knows says.

http://mysite.verizon.net/res6wsqy/id3.html

X-TECH MAN 04-05-2009 07:04 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Wright (Post 113156)
Interesting reading for guys thinking NHRA can't do without us. Not sure how I found this, was doing a serch for something else, reflects my thoughts exactly. From our friend Chuck Norton. Echos what an NHRA official of mine and also racetrack ownner I knows says.

http://mysite.verizon.net/res6wsqy/id3.html

This just about says it all. With everyone seemenly having thier own agendas they seldom see the forest for the trees. With some people wanting a class for every different "color" of car I wonder why I ever thought of trying to having an organization to pull sprotsman racers together to race for some decent money. If its bracket racing you want then stay the hell home and race your local tracks with your high dollar toys. I really couldnt care less. Chuck Norton says it best with this article and brings home the truth. You are your own worst enemy.

treessavoy 04-05-2009 11:12 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Wright (Post 113156)
Interesting reading for guys thinking NHRA can't do without us. Not sure how I found this, was doing a serch for something else, reflects my thoughts exactly. From our friend Chuck Norton. Echos what an NHRA official of mine and also racetrack ownner I knows says.

http://mysite.verizon.net/res6wsqy/id3.html


Chuck is absolutely right, but I thought the deal was to make our own association. I don't believe it was stated anywhere that we were out to hurt the HRS's only find a niche of our own.

This could still be done while running in the HRA's by having our own races BUT I do believe that if Bud will pull out how long will it be before other sponsors follow suit and how long will it be before contingency money can't be afforded anymore.

I believe we are going to see big cutbacks coming to our sport and the classes that are going to suffer are going to be the ones that the fans don't care about watching.......how many people are in the stands when you race!

Jim

Bob Pagano 04-06-2009 08:23 AM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Wow........The pen is still mightier than the sword. Chuck is right on.

buzzinhalfdozen 04-06-2009 11:34 AM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Too many cooks in the kitchen here. Why not let these people set this up their way, do what they think is right. when they have everything finalized look at what they have to offer and decide whether or not you wish to participate or not. Seems simple to me, not too many people are willing to put what I know is alot of effort into something like this so please let all the details be figured out before all the crying begins. Seems as though some are wanting to put the cart in front of the horse, let's see what these gentlemen have to offer before we try to change it Just my opinion. Joe P.S. some time ago it was voiced that racers were unhappy with the way they were treated by the HRA's. I believe this is what these guys are trying to provide us an" alternative"

randy wilson 04-06-2009 01:49 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
i agree. what ever rules they make i will adapt to, as long as it is not dial in.

S.E. Buchanan 04-06-2009 05:44 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Terry:

If you want to do what we talked about forget about getting everybodies opinion and
do what you think is right. Set up the organization tell everyone what you have planned then
see how many members you can get to join the organization. If everyone keeps whinning
and moaning as usual tell them just what you said above and FORGET IT.
If not enough racers want to do something better than what they have now at least you
tried. Then let them moan and groan and laugh at them because they can't see beyond their
own personal interest and wants.

Lynn A McCarty 04-06-2009 05:53 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Chuck's article dead on, and I saw no "leftist" spin! Keep up the good work Chuck. When you start to spin left, we will all be watching. ;)

Terry,

I 100% support the combining of classes, 1.0 weight brakes where ever it makes sense combining automatics and sticks, too. It can be done. I was at the Dutch classic year before last and there were a bunch of GTDA cars. It was way cool.

Art,

Even though it is impossible to be perfect, why wouldnt we strive for a level playing field? Isnt that the whole point?

GarysZ24 04-06-2009 06:24 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 113058)
You forgot Mike Carr in Div. 1 Penn. area.

Ok so now there's 14, and if Art Leong still has his Stocker, 15. Any others??? There probably would be more if manufactures sustained product creation like they did back in the 80's & 90's...example; Hooker used to make headers for the 173c.i. V6 engine (for Chevy Citations) , but they don't now...thus I have to get custom made headers (that cost 2-3x's what they once cost as a regular part back then), in order to have them! That sucks!!

art leong 04-06-2009 07:03 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty (Post 113384)
Chuck's article dead on, and I saw no "leftist" spin! Keep up the good work Chuck. When you start to spin left, we will all be watching. ;)

Terry,

I 100% support the combining of classes, 1.0 weight brakes where ever it makes sense combining automatics and sticks, too. It can be done. I was at the Dutch classic year before last and there were a bunch of GTDA cars. It was way cool.

Art,

Even though it is impossible to be perfect, why wouldnt we strive for a level playing field? Isnt that the whole point?

Lynn if they combine classes where would my car SS/GS fit in your train of thought? What would you combine me with? R/SA I'm sure the guys in that class would not like it one bit
.Or Would you just say "have a nice day, now get lost"?
In a performance based eliminator it is impossible to have a completely level playing field (unless you just run heavy elim)
Years of racing and rule changes have leveled it quite a bit.
Ihra has way more classes than nhra so why not bash them the way you bash nhra. Or is that politically incorrect?

Jim Wahl 04-07-2009 01:31 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 109136)
Might go with ONE pound wt breaks instead of 1/2 lb breaks to further reduce the number of classes in both stock and super stock. Have to add a 6 and 7 lb wt break for the GT S/Sers to give the Hemi, T-Bolts, and Hi HP Corvettes some competition. The slight wt. break might work well to combine GT and traditional Super stockers????? Maybe some wt. break for the lower class automatic stockers and super stockers also. The main thing is there are way to many classes. The manufactures cannot pay for class win for all these different classes in this economy. Why do you think that a class win money has been going down and it isnt worth much even at Indy? All would still run the eliminator on Sunday anyway....not just class winners. Just thinking out loud. One question.....How many FWD cars exist today across the country anyway????

How many FWD cars exist across the country? By my count 42 in Stock that compete at at least one points or national event per year. I as well as Art are sick and tired of people like you Terry who think if it isn't powered by a big or small block Chevy, it isn't a race car. Maybe that's why you are an X-Techman, YOU have your own agenda maybe? Jim

tim worner 04-07-2009 04:36 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
One of the reasons,I believe, the sanctioning bodies have slipped away from the sportsman racer and real performance in the classes is they were once an organization built by racers for the racers. We now have alot of people making rules ect. about racing that know nothing about racing. I would hope that anything new for us goes back to the racer for the racer format. All the input here should be by the people that it will directly affect. Just my 2 cents.

GarysZ24 04-07-2009 07:10 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Wahl (Post 113571)
How many FWD cars exist across the country? By my count 42 in Stock that compete at at least one points or national event per year. I as well as Art are sick and tired of people like you Terry who think if it isn't powered by a big or small block Chevy, it isn't a race car. Maybe that's why you are an X-Techman, YOU have your own agenda maybe? Jim

Jim, I'm with you and Art on the above comments...they give me more motivation to beat those very type of race cars when I can, and lately I've had my share of fun moments. However my most memorable two are :

1. The Camaro racer who raced me in the first round of the '98 Mile High's...he caught me around the 800-1000ft mark, and clicked his motor off so as to coast across the finish line ahead of me. However, the big Winston Vision screen showed me pulling on him because I refused to lift just because he passed me, and I took the stripe by .003!!! I wonder how much crow that guy was eating the rest of that day???

2. Even though Ryan McClanahan & Scott Burton were the finalist's at the '06 Mile High's, it was my fwd Cavalier that had the best package of eliminations (.006), by virtue of running a 16.664 on my 16.66 index/dial, and having a .002rt against my friend Tony Hernandez's '65 Corvette 327V8 11sec. machine. I wish I could rewind my race with Ryan in the quarters, because I had a perfect cool down for my car after the race with Tony, but I was starting to feel light-headed and needed water. Much to my dismay, just as I drove the 1/2 mile back to the north-40 of Bandimere, they called me to the lanes and I warmed my plenum too much, which slowed the car down .13. I know that some who read this will say that excuses are like ..........., but since he crossed the line only .014 over his dial, and came by me pretty fast, I'm certain I would've broke him out if I stayed cooler...I wish for a rematch!!!

X-TECH MAN 04-07-2009 07:20 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Wahl (Post 113571)
How many FWD cars exist across the country? By my count 42 in Stock that compete at at least one points or national event per year. I as well as Art are sick and tired of people like you Terry who think if it isn't powered by a big or small block Chevy, it isn't a race car. Maybe that's why you are an X-Techman, YOU have your own agenda maybe? Jim

Your statement isnt really worth a response but I will try to be civil and say I like 428 Fords,Max Wedges, and Hemi's better anyway.. Since I dont race anymore just HOW could I have an agenda. I only asked how many FWD cars were running in the country. I really dont care how sick you or Art are of hearing me. Dont read my posts if you dont like what you read. I was trying to figure out how the FWD would fit in and have a better chance at a win. With guys with attitudes like yours I really dont give a s##t anymore. NHRA will do you guys in in a couple of years anyway.

Jim Wahl 04-07-2009 07:40 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 113661)
Your statement isnt really worth a response but I will try to be civil and say I like 428 Fords,Max Wedges, and Hemi's better anyway.. Since I dont race anymore just HOW could I have an agenda. I only asked how many FWD cars were running in the country. I really dont care how sick you or Art are of hearing me. Dont read my posts if you dont like what you read. I was trying to figure out how the FWD would fit in and have a better chance at a win. With guys with attitudes like yours I really dont give a s##t anymore. NHRA will do you guys in in a couple of years anyway.

Your last two sentences proved my point Terry, thanks. Jim

Ed Fernandez 04-07-2009 08:14 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
It's getting a little personal now.Maybe it's time to put a fork in it.

Ed F.
Just an innocent bystander

Jim Wahl 04-07-2009 09:06 PM

Re: "WHAT IF" part 4
 
You know Terry I avoid calling anyone a liar at all costs, so I will just let others make up their own minds on this one. So you are just out for FWD competitors own good huh? Make it easier for them to win you say? Then why did you post this in the H.A.M.B. forum? Hummmm?

"Well it sounds good for old guys like us and I started the "Pure stock" class in IHRA years ago when I worked for them for 22 years with basicly the same rules except unfortunatly its open for the newer cars also. There is so much bitching and complaining any more that Im having my doubts that I will continue with a sportsman association. If it does come to be then the "pure stock" class will be included with a name change to "Jr. Stock" and maybe limit the year to 1971 max. Right now the catagory starts at 8 lbs per HP and goes 15 lbs per HP in full lb breaks (8, 9, 10, 11, etc.. If you read the comments on the racers forum then you know what I'm talking about. The FWD (slugs) cars a joke when it comes to spectator intrest."

Thank you once again for proving my point Terry. I think I speak for all FWD competitors, Please,don't do us any favors. Insert fork now. Jim


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.