Re: 65-85 under.
Quote:
|
Re: 65-85 under.
Quote:
When is the last time a B-O-P Racer got a bigger cam or a change in the weight of the rotating assy.? |
Re: 65-85 under.
Let's go with M-B-O-P as the leaders of Stock oppression. Common issues for all four. :D:(
Regardless, we all try our best with the rules & parts we have. All of us have to be a little crazy for doing this. |
Re: 65-85 under.
Quote:
I always thought the 1971 engines started the era of low compression pistons and unleaded fuel.But I might be wrong,as I was only 5 or 6 years old at the time.I know the O got low compression pistons. |
Re: 65-85 under.
Quote:
|
Re: 65-85 under.
Quote:
|
Re: 65-85 under.
Quote:
|
Re: 65-85 under.
Does the M stand for Mercury. I can’t believe how much cam and Dove heads they received. Oh fudge I forgot about the 735 cfm carb. I know what CFM stands for us Mo Par’s
|
Re: 65-85 under.
You can build a 1969 Camaro 396/375 without using an original OEM part?
|
Re: 65-85 under.
The Rule Book "enhancements" have enabled this crap. The old guard of the NHRA Rule Book (i.e; Farmer, Greg X and the like) paved a better way of enforcing the rules by employing good qualified people with the dedication to the book.
A great Division Director, as a leader must see rules integrity as the cornerstone, not as an Event Marketing Manager. Especially D1. Of all places. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.