Re: CJ mustang engines
Quote:
|
Re: CJ mustang engines
I will be in columbus with the same parts I had at INDY. We will see if I get to race?
Andrew I am game for anything. If I were to get 50 hp I could run E/SA at #2970. I don't see all the crying over a little 281. |
Re: CJ mustang engines
Quote:
I would probably get my rear kicked even racing you in E, but I sure would like a shot at it. Better than trying to race you in J anyway. You have the power to get to E all by yourself. Just run her out a few hundered feet more. LOL. |
Re: CJ mustang engines
James just put the 283 back in her and we can race all the time. I will even give you a small head start. Even if I beat you I can't pass tech.
|
Re: CJ mustang engines
Quote:
I thought Ford fixed their clerical error on the parts anyway. Not done yet ? |
Re: CJ mustang engines
No the clerical error is fixed.
Just for you James I will run it balls out to 800ft this weekend. |
Re: CJ mustang engines
Quote:
|
Re: CJ mustang engines
Well, since this thread is about CJ engines, I do have a question
do the 428, 352, and 281 engines that are being run in stock use a conventional style intake manifold with a throttle body on top like the Drag Paks use ? |
Re: CJ mustang engines
Quote:
The 352 and 428 use an intake and throttle body similar to the Drag Pak. The 281 uses the standard type fuel injection system. regards, Roland |
Re: CJ mustang engines
The352 and 428 engines are old windsor SBF based pushrod motors which do use a conventional intake with a four barrel throttle body. The 281 is a mod-motor, overhead cam engine, but I think it uses the OEM style intake (composite/plastic?) with a newer style single hole TB.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.