Re: M.g.
 

Right.....there's no reason for a level playing field.....:-(

Re: M.g.
 

Oh and John, one more thing:

DON'T RED LIGHT!!!!!

Re: M.g.
 

If a “clean tree” is defined as the slower car’s driver seeing only their own side blink down, then that would apply to the faster car too: Any handicap more than 1.5 seconds will present both drivers with this “clean tree”.

As well, any handicap less than 1.5 seconds and no one gets this “clean tree”.

NHRA, end this dinosaur-inequity now. Don’t take a poll. Simply install the software and be done with it.

Re: M.g.
 

I think this post shows that people with nothing better to do will just keep on asking for changes..it has changed to much and to fast the last ten years..the first red light rule has cons and pro's...It will not change anything in the end...but just be another "Change" ..dual redlights where the first car did not drag the other car along isn't that many..and the cases were the slower cars in that scenario is the winner is even fewer...just a another way for a "redlight looser" to get back in the race as i see it..DONT REDLIGHT..put the pressure on the other guy...if you have problems with redlights you wont win anything anyway...so change that manner instead!

Re: M.g.
 

Well, I thought I had said all I was going to on this subject but I unfortunately read the last several
posts and decided I would say one or two more things.

#1. If you ain't been there you got no right to try to change things.

#2. The guy sitting there waiting on the slower car is not going to have the same light he/she
would have had if they see the red light before they react. It distracts you unless
you are using a blinder and most don't for their on reasons. Been there ,done that too many
times.

.

Re: M.g.
 

I have been there, so I guess that gives me the right to post on it.

S.E., neither driver will see a red light until after BOTH CARS have left the line.

A red light will mean "you lose," and the computer won't know who has "lost" until it compares both lights. It has no way to know whether the second car to leave will have had a worse red light than the first (and thereby become the loser) until he leaves the line, so there's NO WAY this system will affect the concentration of the faster car's driver. He will always assume the other car had a green light until he's left the line and sees a red, if there IS one.

He will see what he's always seen if the first car to leave had a good green light. NO additional distraction....

I can't see a downside to this.... really.

Re: M.g.
 

BSA said: "I think this post shows that people with nothing better to do will just keep on asking for changes."


>>>This hasn't changed for FORTY-SIX YEARS.... and all the time, the first car to leave has been enduring a set of circumstances that the second car to leave does not; if the car in the other lane redlights first,the second car never has to face the jeopardy of a possible red light.... it has a free ride to the next round, no matter WHAT kind of a light it would have had.

>>>That's not a level playing field by any stretch of the imagination. If it can be changed, why shouldn't it?
Neither driver will notice the difference until AFTER both cars have left the line and a red light comes on in the lane that had the worse one. This "Change" won't affect either driver's program until it's evident that it won't matter; the race will be over as soon as he finds out there was an infraction.



BSA said, "it has changed to much and to fast the last ten years."

>>>That is your opinion; I tend to agree with that, but this change willl require NOTHING from any driver, as far as "adjusting" his program.... He'll be totally unaware of it unless he red lights worse than the car in the other lane, and only then, AFTER both have left the line. Neither car's red light will show until after BOTH cars have launched.



BSA said, "the first red light rule has cons and pro's...It will not change anything in the end...but just be another "Change"


>>>With a double red light system, If my car is in a faster class than yours, and you red light -.003 and I red light -.004, you just won that race, BUT, the way it is now, ~I~ would have won it because my "worse" red light would not have counted because.... yours was first. I'd go to the next round, not you, even though my infraction was worse than yours.

>>>So, yes, it will change things; it will stop that kind of nonsense.




BSA said, ".dual redlights where the first car did not drag the other car along isn't that many..


>>>That is true.... this new double red light rule won't come into play very often at all.




BSA said, "and the cases were the slower cars in that scenario is the winner is even fewer...


>>>That is probably true, too....



BSA said, "just a another way for a "redlight loser" to get back in the race as i see it."



>>>Using the double red light system, if the other (second to leave) car red lights WORSE (an impossibility, now) then the first car is NOT a "red light loser" and doesn't need to "get back into the race" since he was never out of it. He won that round. Worse red light loses.




BSA said, "DONT REDLIGHT."


>>>Oh yes..... good advice; right up there with "WIN THE RACE!!!"
>>>Nothing to it....
>>>Like the lady said; "It's just BOOM, BOOM, BOOM, GO! What's the problem???" LOL!




BSA said, "Put the pressure on the other guy...if you have problems with redlights you wont win anything anyway...so change that manner instead![/QUOTE]

>>>But, you'll win more if the system gives HIM his chance to redlight, too.... irrefutable logic!!! LOL!

Re: M.g.
 

When I started racing at US 30 if both cars redlit or broke out, both lost. If both cars went red or broke out in the finals, both got second place money. Probably saved US 30 a bunch of money.

Of course winning paid $35 and second paid $15.

Re: M.g.
 

Jack,

I'm not sure what all would be in Marks book (answering your question), but I think I know one or two things that've changed when you guys started doing this level of racing:

1. The aftermarket made a lot more products for slower cars to use in Stock/Super Stock than they do now---remember when Hooker Headers produced headers for Chevy FWD V6's? Ask Linda Sherman about them since she had them on her Citation, back in the '90's before she sold the car to Randy Hyman.

2. We don't have the luxury of a variety of slick sizes like the faster class cars do as well, and I don't know of any radial slicks being made that are clearance legal for Stock that fwd's or cars such as Lane Weber's "Skyhawk" can use...do you? If so please tell me who makes them, so I can shop for them...

3. Even the big three's high-performance catalogs had products that would be legal for slower rollers to use in our classes back then..(i.e. the Mopar stuff for the 2.2's, and parts for the GM 90 & 60 degree V6's, and their 2.0 4cyl engines--after all, the Archer brothers were terrors in I.M.S.A. racing back in the 80's with their Cavaliers with those engines...).

Re: M.g.
 

Amen Mark...