Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
When I match raced Robin Lawrence, I had over 400 lbs of ballast in my COPO. If I were running the production LT1 the only major difference is the hood. Where do I put another 500 lbs? |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
|
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
Just on the "silly side" I've always found the Cheese Burger, Pizza and Beer diet to help add a couple of Pounds right in the drivers seat. Legal ballast and a good artery clogger as well. Probably easier to find an over weight driver then a skinny one! Enjoy the Pizza and Beer and lets go racing! Respectfully, Henry Kunz 1534 H/SA |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
|
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
The new cars are nothing like the old cars. The seats, wheels, wiring, modules, rear cradle, transmissions, emissions, safety, equipment, etc. have made them stupid heavy in production form. |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
With production car you have to run the battery in the front where they were put by factory. So front battery and add one in the back. +50lbs Use factory seats instead of light weight race seats +120lbs With production car in stock you can even use back seat +75lbs Instead of light weight 3 or 5 gallon fuel cell use max allowed 16gal fuel cell or even better heavier stock fuel tank. +75lbs No rule that a car has to be built with chrome moly instead of mild steel. Mild steel cage with few extra bars +90lbs Add factory spare tire and jack. +45lbs NHRA allowed 500lbs of permanent mounted ballast. Walla 4000lbs LT1 2023 SS Camaro. |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
|
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
On another note, I have been told to make it clear that it is FX not A/FX. |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
Should we manipulate the rules so the other unfavorable cars in the guide will be built? |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
|
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
I'm sure everyone knows that I love muscle cars but we can't have an eliminator full of 50 plus year old cars - even the fans in the stands like and are excited about seeing a good old fashioned 'old vs new' drag race ............ All that plus those of us who know you are sure it makes your day when you win a round against a modern era racer . Yes, I know this is a bit off the F/X subject but since you brought it up .........Anyway I like the F/X cars but feel we won't see very many of them . |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
For crying out loud Jack, over the past 2 years I've raced a 2005 car and a 1999! That's a whole bunch newer than most of the stuff out there. And you of all people should know that I'm not going to spring for head gaskets if I don't NEED them. Where are you going with this? Would you like to see NHRA pull the "20 year" rule out of it's ***** again? Let's just agree to like all of the stuff that's out there now.
|
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
|
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
|
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
Bret Velde ??/SA |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
My buddy was one of the first shops that started to build a COPO Camaro under this premise, with oversight from NHRA. Then, he started to hear that the big chassis shops got orders from racers and started to complain to NHRA that it was too difficult for them to build the car with the OEM body components. NHRA gave in and Five-Star and other companies that build carbon fiber bodies got involved too to make the body parts. If my buddy had built the car with the new rules, which by the way, have not been released, he would have saved himself over 250 hours of labor and lots of money in parts. The new cars are just a tube chassis with carbon fiber parts attached similar to a Pro Stock. |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
I want to make it very clear from the start that I do not know if this is still the case.
But when the move came to the new Pro Stock bodies, be aware that the most well known chassis builders had exclusive rights to the bodies. Each developed a certain make and they profit from every body used on every car that is built, whether it's built in their shop or not. Before anybody starts, I'm not against capitalism or people making money, I'm just pointing this out to clarify why the 1 piece front ends and the body rule change was so heavily pushed by them. It created a monopoly and a new profit center. Again, I don't know from direct information, but I'm pretty sure that's why the rules for the new class got changed. When I was racing, different manufacturers would hand out body kits - which was the roof, quarters, and trunk. Everybody who they approved got the same part numbers in the crate. But again, some builders were much better at tweaking those parts than others. So some kept crying it wasn't fair instead of doing R&D on aero and finding ways to fit the templates and still improve the bodies. That is where the Standard Bodies arose from. Can't beat em, push for a participation trophy sort of thing. I know this is a class racer board and is supposed to cover Stock and Super Stock. My deepest knowledge is in Pro Stock but to be honest I could not pick my favorite among all three. If this is getting tiresome, somebody say so and I'll shut up. |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
I just reread the 2023 rule supplement and it says it must be OEM roof and quarters, no where do I see it saying carbon fiber. Am I missing something?
I never saw so many people uptight about a new class coming out. Most people I have talked to are excited about this class, and are hoping it will be the new Pro Stock down the road. Some of you want to kill it thinking they will increase are quotas instead. lol |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Steel roof and quarters. Carbon fiber front ends and doors etc. It would have been cool to keep all OEM body panels, but it is what it is . At least they still look like factory cars.
These cars are badass ! |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
|
Re: new A/FX CLASS
I thought this class was above cool... The factory car bodies would be just like the old days of pro stock and would sell cars.This 1st Camaro ruined it for me as a spectator. The car doesn't look like a factory car, especially behind the doors. Rick Flare would be proud of this rear end of the Camaro.
Geoff Turks car looks like a real factory body and the build of Chis Holbrook has the looks of factory as well. https://youtu.be/0AQO2wZ9V7k |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
That is so awesome!
Keep the 10.5 tire |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
I suppose most of you have seen it already, but I watched the Jeff Turks run and crash in his A/FX Challenger. What a super cool car, but scary crash, glad he is okay.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGf-SH3VofY https://moparinsiders.com/nhra-facto...uring-testing/ |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
Cool video Joe did! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp6jIdn-9Zo |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
I had heard about the crash, but hadn't gone to look for the video. Two things came to mind: On these types of cars, I don't think I've ever seen the deck lid dip down before it meets the wing. And I was surprised the car was in first gear for so long. I realize these are still being developed, so whether the deck contour comes from the rules or is an experiment could make a difference. Same for ratio in first gear. |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
As a side note, Geoff posted a few days ago on FB that he was not feeling well. His wife talked him into going to the hospital and they found a couple bleeders in his brain from the crash. They got him fixed up and he is back at it.
|
Re: new A/FX CLASS
NHRA is in the entertainment business. Their first priority is to draw spectators. And for those that think the priority should be to supply racers a place to race.... How profitable do you think a divisional is with no spectators? How long do most businesses last not being profitable??
Sadly take away heads up runs and Stock and Super Stock is just expensive bracket racing. And maybe some of you are better than me but watching bracket racing is not very exciting for the most part. After a couple of pairs unless I'm watching a specific car or friend and..... Super Classes, Bracket Racing with an index. Damn competition eliminator is same, just CIC instead of breaking out...... Heads up drag racing is not cheap to participate, but it is the easiest to watch, especially for a drag racing newbie. It appears NHRA is lowering sportsman quotas and minimal rounds on Sunday for easier viewing and a better show while still keeping us involved. I give them credit right now as car counts are up with the pros and alcohol classes, Factory Stock is getting the car manufacturers involved which is a great thing, and if there are guys willing to build a factory stock car on steroids... Thank you!! The only ones that should be bitching here are the guys spending the $ to build the cars. The rest of us should be thankful for their efforts! Everyone should pray NHRA is around in 10 years and do everything possible to make it happen. We need them much more than they need us and give a big props to them for trying to draw the spectator and put on a great show. We are not in the 70's anymore and NHRA TV is the greatest thing since sliced bread, well unless you're trying to work on your race car in the shop LOL! Thank you NHRA, Racers building cars for this class and fingers crossed manufacturers stay involved and support this class!! |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
So the plot thickens.
From IHRA - "In addition, there will be a heads-up Real Steel, No-Time class that requires OEM steel shell, steel doors and steel fenders (with the exception of those originally fiberglass, which must be factory-original parts). No Billet heads or engine blocks are allowed." I don't follow outlaw racing so I'm not sure what existing cars (if any) could fit the class. I'm posting this due to the conversation about getting new specators and new racers into the sport. |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Just saw where Ex Pro Stock racer Allen Johnson is going to drive Jeff Turks car.
|
Re: new A/FX CLASS
There's an article on Competition Plus. Geoff is no longer driving.
Turk Faces Near Death Experience Which Puts Allen Johnson Behind The Wheel Again |
Re: new A/FX CLASS
Quote:
Thanks for the link, Mike. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.