CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Going DEEP.... (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=60382)

Ed Wright 12-01-2015 11:04 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
You love to brag. Maybe it's you that reacts slow, and not the car? LOL

1320racer 12-01-2015 11:10 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
it ain't bragging if you can back it up and I obviously can ;) and it could be, I'm old but not ancient like you.:p

What I love to do is dispel hearsay, proving the facts and the truth!!

Oh and my very good nine second car is actually a very good eight second car. :D That 9.00 @ 149.33 pass is courtesy of my restrictor plate.

Rod Greene 12-02-2015 12:54 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Imediately had to go to 28" front tires, lower my 2 step RPM, and find a slower button


And why should automatics be allowed a delay device? I could have a 12inch throw button in my car and it still wont leave until I release the clutch.

Billy Nees 12-02-2015 08:31 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1320racer (Post 489197)
What I love to do is dispel hearsay, proving the facts and the truth!!

Gee, me too! I guess that we're just getting to be like the Lame-stream Media. It depends on what facts and truths we want to prove and how it benefits our personal agenda!

Dan Fletcher 12-02-2015 09:05 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
I never understood why deep staging was banned either; well, yes I did, see Bill Koski's post.

There is NO DOUBT that it can be nearly impossible to hit the tree leaving on a flash of the bottom in some cars. And "some cars" can even be 10 second cars (probably faster, but I can't speak to that). Case in point, my '69 F/SA car and the new Copo. Neither hits the tree great, I'm always on the "turned up" end of adjustment, often taking bumps. Conversely, the K/SA wagon hits the tree like a bitch! Instant rotation. Many times I find myself lowering rpm and tire pressure to keep it green. High 11 second car...go figure...

James Perrone 12-02-2015 09:54 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Deep staging is just a crutch just like blocking.Im not good at either .As a driver you have to adjust day to day .Like they say DEEP STAGING IS A CRIME.Cant do it
Go buy a funny car.. Like all knowing Dan said its mental?

JOE ZOOM 12-02-2015 09:58 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Fletcher (Post 489209)
I never understood why deep staging was banned either; well, yes I did, see Bill Koski's post.

There is NO DOUBT that it can be nearly impossible to hit the tree leaving on a flash of the bottom in some cars. And "some cars" can even be 10 second cars (probably faster, but I can't speak to that). Case in point, my '69 F/SA car and the new Copo. Neither hits the tree great, I'm always on the "turned up" end of adjustment, often taking bumps. Conversely, the K/SA wagon hits the tree like a bitch! Instant rotation. Many times I find myself lowering rpm and tire pressure to keep it green. High 11 second car...go figure...


Dan.....Thank You......Joe Mocci

Ed Wright 12-02-2015 10:21 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rod Greene (Post 489200)
Imediately had to go to 28" front tires, lower my 2 step RPM, and find a slower button


And why should automatics be allowed a delay device? I could have a 12inch throw button in my car and it still wont leave until I release the clutch.

Rod, you don't have an adjustable stop on or under your clutch pedal? Like about everybody I know uses? Like I used when I raced a stick car?

Signman 12-02-2015 10:42 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Bracket racers who are deep staging with 9 second cars are doing it because they are more comfortable.
Most of the psychological advantages were taken away when it became obvious even to blind persons what was going on.

Agree there are some cars / combinations that may not be able to hit the tree but before asking for a rule change every area of the car should be examined to speed up the car the first 12" of the run whether that be up or forward. May have to spend son cash on parts though......:p

A prominent racer asked me how I hit the tree in an 11 second car, he felt he could not, told him in my car he would have no problem.

Michael Beard 12-02-2015 10:59 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
The amount of misconceptions here is staggering.

First and foremost, NHRA wanted deep staging gone because of controversy. Too many people didn't understand how the system worked, or you had people trying to take advantage of the system (both deep and shallow drivers), people racing to the starting line, etc. It was convenient for NHRA to have a show vote.

Quote:

You don't think it was because deep staging makes your ET show slower? You can run faster than the clocks show?
No. It is about reaction time. If you are deep staging, your ET will be slower. If you are deep staging, you cannot magically decide to run your shallow-staged ET in the middle of a run. Obviously if a deep car shallow stages, it will pick up ET, but the driver better be able to hit the tree. There's a bazillion ways to hide ET. Deep staging isn't "hiding" anything. It is completely transparent, predictable, and out in the open.

Quote:

What is right about some cars being able to actually break out, and not show it?
This isn't Comp Eliminator. Except in heads-up runs, S/SS cars have dial-ins on them, in which case any car can be able to break out. Deep staging is completely irrelevant.

Quote:

The vast majority of cars can not get a green light that way.
There is a MASSIVE amount of difference in potential rollout when you consider the difference in human reaction time, vehicle reaction time, and timing systems. Some people have a preferred "spot" .03-.04 different than other drivers. Drivers can also make slight adjustments in how they look at the tree, whether it be closing one eye, sunglasses, or blocking the tree (which is worth .03 just by itself). Vehicles can have a huge difference in rollout depending on tires, rpm, ignition timing, gear, converter, shocks, and other suspension, in addition to whether the car drives through the beams or snaps the tire up out of the beam. Additionally, there can be as much as .06 difference between a fiber optic Compulink and a TSI with a certain style of LED bulbs.

I have driven two different cars that had the same 60', ET, and MPH that reacted over a tenth different. I have raced at two different tracks on the same day whose rollouts were .050 different. I have made adjustments to the car that have slowed the rollout .030, other adjustments worth .02, and others worth .012, all of which could be compounded.

Quote:

They don't make buttons THAT slow. LOL
The Just-N-Time button has a solid .100 or more available in it, in addition to the wide variety of variables noted above.

Quote:

In the end I found a way (mentally and mechanically ) to adapt and found you could hit the tree
You need to define "hitting the tree". I "can" hit the tree shallow in the Turismo leaving off the second bulb going out, BUT my window of variance is *much* tighter when deep staging, and I'm much more consistent. With today's level of competition, .030's is no longer considered "hitting the tree". If I'm in the .020's, I'm making adjustments to tighten it up. That's what it takes to be truly competitive these days. While a slow car "may" be able to hit the tree, it's like moving the target further away at a gun range. The accuracy and consistency suffers. It's bad enough that slower cars aren't as consistent or as easy to drive the finish line with. If you continually add handicaps... well, it's no wonder there are so few in competition now.

Ed Wright 12-02-2015 11:15 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
I had to go to the Just-N-Time button. Best button I have found, for me.

I did not find a tenth in it.

I found the black (weakest/slowest) spring to not repeat very well for me. Probably just me.
I use the next slowest (orange?) spring. I do have a couple of spacers on it.

I could not get the previous popular button with spacers slow enough, even modified a couple. Could not get there.

I'm 72 years old and have to stage shallow and use a blinder also to get a green light. I'm not sure a young guy could just step in my car and get a green light. I know it ain't my lightening fast 72 year old reflexes. It has to be the car.

Rich Biebel 12-02-2015 11:35 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Thanks Michael Beard for your post as their was way too much incorrect stuff being thrown out here....


Deep staging was used by a few racers well know here on the east coast. And they won a ton of $$$ and races doing it....

LONG before any of us knew why or how they could do this successfully..

I can remember racing one of the best a few times and since I close one eye and blocked the other side of the tree with my free hand.....the last thing I saw was the top light going out on the other side.......It was always a challenge wondering why they were deep staging but I ignored it and focused on what I was doing....

Deep staging WAS allowed in S/G and S/ST at the beginning of those categories......We all learned very quickly how much that changed your RT and ET.....and also other things in a car that had a big effect on RT's...

Mark Yacavone 12-02-2015 12:08 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Thank you ,Michael

I didn't want to get too technical in my early replies.

Dan touched on something, I believe.

It was asked why some of the faster bracket cars would want to deep stage.
If they are all the way in it, ramped up, on the converter and can only hit .030 lights at a certain track due to variables, as Michael mentioned,...there's nowhere to go from there. If they're deep, they can adjust the RPM and put it exactly where they feel comfortable.

Jepperson 12-02-2015 02:23 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
As a bracket racer, I would love to see deep staging return to NHRA Sportsman. Makes Stock Eliminator much more attractive for bracket racers. Id love to give Stock a try, but no way I could afford a lower class car. My uncle Jerrys SS/BA ride 60s 1.25-1.30 and it's a struggle to hit the bottom yellow in it.

JOE ZOOM 12-02-2015 02:23 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Beard (Post 489222)
The amount of misconceptions here is staggering.

First and foremost, NHRA wanted deep staging gone because of controversy. Too many people didn't understand how the system worked, or you had people trying to take advantage of the system (both deep and shallow drivers), people racing to the starting line, etc. It was convenient for NHRA to have a show vote.



No. It is about reaction time. If you are deep staging, your ET will be slower. If you are deep staging, you cannot magically decide to run your shallow-staged ET in the middle of a run. Obviously if a deep car shallow stages, it will pick up ET, but the driver better be able to hit the tree. There's a bazillion ways to hide ET. Deep staging isn't "hiding" anything. It is completely transparent, predictable, and out in the open.



This isn't Comp Eliminator. Except in heads-up runs, S/SS cars have dial-ins on them, in which case any car can be able to break out. Deep staging is completely irrelevant.



There is a MASSIVE amount of difference in potential rollout when you consider the difference in human reaction time, vehicle reaction time, and timing systems. Some people have a preferred "spot" .03-.04 different than other drivers. Drivers can also make slight adjustments in how they look at the tree, whether it be closing one eye, sunglasses, or blocking the tree (which is worth .03 just by itself). Vehicles can have a huge difference in rollout depending on tires, rpm, ignition timing, gear, converter, shocks, and other suspension, in addition to whether the car drives through the beams or snaps the tire up out of the beam. Additionally, there can be as much as .06 difference between a fiber optic Compulink and a TSI with a certain style of LED bulbs.

I have driven two different cars that had the same 60', ET, and MPH that reacted over a tenth different. I have raced at two different tracks on the same day whose rollouts were .050 different. I have made adjustments to the car that have slowed the rollout .030, other adjustments worth .02, and others worth .012, all of which could be compounded.



The Just-N-Time button has a solid .100 or more available in it, in addition to the wide variety of variables noted above.



You need to define "hitting the tree". I "can" hit the tree shallow in the Turismo leaving off the second bulb going out, BUT my window of variance is *much* tighter when deep staging, and I'm much more consistent. With today's level of competition, .030's is no longer considered "hitting the tree". If I'm in the .020's, I'm making adjustments to tighten it up. That's what it takes to be truly competitive these days. While a slow car "may" be able to hit the tree, it's like moving the target further away at a gun range. The accuracy and consistency suffers. It's bad enough that slower cars aren't as consistent or as easy to drive the finish line with. If you continually add handicaps... well, it's no wonder there are so few in competition now.

Nice Job Mike....Thanks..Joe Mocci

Mepprecht 12-02-2015 03:04 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
I have a time card from the summer nationals this year, I accidentally went deep.... On the reaction time it just says DEEP. It was R3.

Mark Yacavone 12-02-2015 03:12 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mepprecht (Post 489255)
I have a time card from the summer nationals this year, I accidentally went deep.... On the reaction time it just says DEEP. It was R3.

Tree was already started so it didn't go red. The deep , no r/t must be part of that software package..Of course, it's shut off for the Pros.

Mepprecht 12-02-2015 03:18 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone (Post 489256)
Tree was already started so it didn't go red. The deep , no r/t must be part of that software package..Of course, it's shut off for the Pros.

It went red as soon as I bumped it in deep.

Mark Yacavone 12-02-2015 03:44 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mepprecht (Post 489257)
It went red as soon as I bumped it in deep.

Oh.. that's the way it works then, unfortunately.

Once the tree starts, you could keep rolling in and it wouldn't go red..obviously .

Tim Ellis 12-02-2015 05:35 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
I say let's get NHRA to allow it. It's true many slower reacting cars can't hit a light shallow. What is it hurting you if the other driver goes deep? Nothing. If you don't think it's fair , go deep too. Or better yet just stage quickly so the slower ( most likely) driver doesn't have time to go in carefully deep. He may still be bumping as his lights are coming down. Been on the bad side of that one.

JOE ZOOM 12-02-2015 07:00 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Ellis (Post 489273)
I say let's get NHRA to allow it. It's true many slower reacting cars can't hit a light shallow. What is it hurting you if the other driver goes deep? Nothing. If you don't think it's fair , go deep too. Or better yet just stage quickly so the slower ( most likely) driver doesn't have time to go in carefully deep. He may still be bumping as his lights are coming down. Been on the bad side of that one.




Hey Tim...Nice Post. The burden to stage deep has always been on the deep stager.I never understood the issues competitors had.Any so called games by anyone have been resolved by NHRA implementing the auto start and courtesy staging.

Tim Ellis 12-02-2015 07:55 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Exactly Joe

The Hawk 12-02-2015 08:14 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Maybe sometime this coming season I should put someone else in the Skyhawk to see how they do. At legal weight for V/SA at Denver, I shallow stage with 26" tall front runners and use either a 2 Step or foot brake and have troubles at times keeping it green. The normal 60` times are in the mid 2.20`s. This is with a low gear TH 350 trans and leaving on color on the last amber.

j gardiner 12-02-2015 09:04 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Thanks Mike and Dan for clearing up a lot of those inaccurate statements. You guys credentials can't be disputed. Anybody trying to argue with your information just shows their ignorance. Another reason a lot of bracket racers deep stage even though they are in fast cars. As you pointed the wild variables in rollout etc. deep staging eliminates a lot of that. You can go track to track and just make small adjustments.

Bruce Noland 12-02-2015 09:20 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Deep staging was banned for two reasons. 1.) It was causing a lot of problems for the racers in the opposing lane who were not deep staging, and 2.) A poll was conducted and a large majority of the racers voted against it. nhra put that problem away years ago and you can believe it will never allow it to return.

Ed Wright 12-02-2015 09:40 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
^^^^^^^ There you go.

Mark Yacavone 12-02-2015 10:22 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland (Post 489284)
1.) It was causing a lot of problems for the racers in the opposing lane who were not deep staging,

Bruce, I honestly don't remember this. Could you give us an example?
What I remember is it causing a lot of problems for racers who DID deep stage.
A few guys would skip their burnout or do a brief one, then charge up to the line and stage quickly so the d/s er wouldn't have time to get all the way in, instead of just running their own program.
NHRA didn't quite know how to deal with it, so they put up a bogus poll so they would be covered.
I called the poll bogus because ,as I mentioned in my first post here, polling people who probably would never deep stage makes little sense, unless they wanted a specific outcome.
Also included in this "poll" were those who didn't even understand the concept, as illustrated right here in this very thread.
Quote:

^^^^^^^ There you go.
ED, I thought you were done with this thread, a few pages back?

JOE ZOOM 12-02-2015 10:28 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone (Post 489299)
Bruce, I honestly don't remember this. Could you give us an example?
What I remember is it causing a lot of problems for racers who DID deep stage.
A few guys would skip their burnout or do a brief one, then charge up to the line and stage quickly so the d/s er wouldn't have time to get all the way in, instead of just running their own program.
NHRA didn't quite know how to deal with it, so they put up a bogus poll so they would be covered.
I called the poll bogus because ,as I mentioned in my first post here, polling people who probably would never deep stage makes little sense, unless they wanted a specific outcome.
Also included in this "poll" were those who didn't even understand the concept, as illustrated right here in this very thread.
ED, I thought you were done with this thread, a few pages back?

You are spot on Mark.....Joe Mocci

jmantle 12-02-2015 10:58 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Hawk (Post 489282)
Maybe sometime this coming season I should put someone else in the Skyhawk to see how they do. At legal weight for V/SA at Denver, I shallow stage with 26" tall front runners and use either a 2 Step or foot brake and have troubles at times keeping it green. The normal 60` times are in the mid 2.20`s. This is with a low gear TH 350 trans and leaving on color on the last amber.

Mark, I'll gladly volunteer to swap cars for a run. Mine runs low 1.90 60's and I can't wait for the bottom amber with 24" front tires, even at sea level.

Jim Mantle V/SA 6632

The Hawk 12-02-2015 11:21 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jmantle (Post 489302)
Mark, ....
Jim Mantle V/SA 6632

????? Lane here.

I`m sure everyone has a different rhythm with the tree as well. The LED bulbs made a huge difference for me 12 years ago.

Bruce Noland 12-02-2015 11:31 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Mark you have a very good memory and I'm surprised you don't remember the uproar this caused. The poll was not bogus. It was a racers only poll and all of us understood the issue very well. The issue of deep staging was thoroughly hashed out, voted upon and booted by the racers. It's that simple. The issue is dead.

Michael Beard 12-02-2015 11:37 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
When you have voting on a subject by a massive majority over a distinct minority, of course the majority is going to win. People don't care unless it affects *them*. Would people "vote out" FWD cars? I mean, "they're not real race cars", right? And "Why would anybody want to race a 5000# LTD?" They should vote those out, too. Trucks? Gone. 4-doors? Gone. Turbo cars? Too hard to police. :rolleyes:

The timing system companies bend over backwards to accommodate delay box cars with CrossTalk and StageLock, but can't write code to handle a "D" after the dial-in to make the system recognize two bulbs as "pre-staged" and "staged-only" (top bulb out) as "staged". Then you'd have 100% AutoStart for everyone.

Bruce Noland 12-02-2015 11:46 PM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
You are 100% correct a massive majority will beat a distinct minority in a poll every time. In this case the massive majority of the racers chose to ban the headache known as deep staging.

Mark Yacavone 12-03-2015 12:06 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
I guess it's not a headache for the pro's.
Bruce, doesn't this kill you? Eight pages on a dead issue?
It's gonna be a long two months, buddy.

JOE ZOOM 12-03-2015 12:09 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Hey Bruce, Mark asked if you could give an example of how deep staging caused an issue for the opponent who is not deep staged?....Joe Mocci

Bruce Noland 12-03-2015 12:12 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Pros have a different deal all together. A long two months? Not for me buddy. Do you plan on racing again or just having some keyboard fun?

Mark Yacavone 12-03-2015 12:16 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland (Post 489313)
Pros have a different deal all together. A long two months? Not for me buddy. Do you plan on racing again or just having some keyboard fun?

Ya never know with me. If I find something to drive with 3 pedals, well then...

Almost forgot to say...so I wouldn't have to deep stage LOL

Bruce Noland 12-03-2015 12:22 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Joe, there were problems for racers who were not sure if the racer in the other lane was still staged when the bulb went out and it was an unnecessary distraction to what should be a pretty simple procedure. That's one reason deep staging was banned. You don't think nhra would go to the trouble of polling the racers if there were not big problems with deep staging. .. do ya? Think about putting the four barrel on your car and you could leave just like all the other 69 350 combos - if you're still running that car.

MR DERBY CITY 12-03-2015 01:08 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
As far as I am concerned the Slower Cars took it up the shorts when NHRA declared Going Deep illegal. Bruce is absolutely correct....The issue is dead. I can live with that decision,however... We need to Revisit the Worst Redlight ....just to even things out. As a matter of fact, I think I will call my close friend , Al at Port a Tree tomorrow .We need to get the ball Rollin on this.

Larry Hill 12-03-2015 09:27 AM

Re: Going DEEP....
 
Does anyone remember when some of the racers would go way deep, and then would back up to turn the stage lite back on? The last movement to stage was not rolling forward as it should be.


Putting "Deep" on the window tells the starter "don't start the tree until I'm ready to race" It looks to me like that would be an advantage knowing that the tree would not start until the deep stager was stage.


Doing a short burn out and going to the line is not breaking any rules. Deep stagers will do that to put pressure on there foe, and vice versa. Bottom line, you have to be ready!


If you want a clean tree build a slow car. If you want win on the first red lite build a fast car. If you want to win and do well work at it. The Champs I have observed over the years all have a great work ethic.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.