Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winnin fasterg
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winnin fasterg
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
An AMC Pacer dialed 14.49 just won stock at Spokane today.
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Amc Pacer,Amc Gremlin, Amc Matador also turbo 4 cyl. Caravan, PT Cruiser these all make respectable Dime rockets. By the way congrats on your win Micheal. Claude
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
This weekend here in Spokane a u/sa pacer took down a a/s camaro I was gunning for the stick car but good job to the little 6 popper, it can be done I was ready to build an ss/k now I am looking at L/S! Cost of course
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
1 Attachment(s)
Here's is another great race car V6 truck, Larrt Hill winning 95 Atlanta Chev truck.
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
this was racing brackets at Grove Creek Raceway in Minnesota last Saturday night.
http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/i...2/DSC_4718.jpg |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winnin fasterg
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winnin fasterg
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Congratulations to defending World Champion Phil Combs on sweeping the weekend so far at Mountain Park Dragway in Clay City, KY, driving Jim Woods' Borrowed Money L/SA Chevy II. Philbilly won the No-Box race Friday night, and then won Stock last night (early this morning, as they started late to get past the 100+ degree temps), taking out Pittsburgh Pro-Am winner Rob Bihl in Harlan Updike's Q/SA sled in the finals.
Couple more great showings for the slow rides! |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
I won the HDRA drags at Riverhead Raceway last year in July in a 2001 4cyl Camry, slo and consistent thru 6 rounds, lol. Not a lot of happy people who raced me especially high dollar restored Vette in finals, could not catch my camry, lol. dialed by temp outside temp guage on dash.
Nothing like a good underdog story. |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winnin fasterg
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winnin fasterg
Quote:
1. No GM product has won a NHRA national or divisional event ever! 2. No fwd car has won a NHRA national/divisional event so far this century! 3. No fwd car has finished in the top ten NHRA national/divisional points standings! 4. I'm not sure where the IHRA is with regards to this (Michael Beard I hope you will enlighten me here), but I think the above applies to IHRA too (unless you or that Cavalier stocker racer from back in the '80's who inspired me to build/race my car, did it)? 5. There's never been a multiple event winner with a fwd stocker! There's five REALLY BIG reasons I continue (as best I can), to race my fwd slower roller. Once I get my financial house in better shape, I'm going after all of those that aren't nabbed by someone else out there with the appropriate race cars...I like a challenge, and my $5k slower roller is waiting for it's chance to show (by more race time), it's capable of winning too. Oh, and one more thing, where Jody and Toby's stockers are concerned, only Jody's car qualifies as a slow stocker, since any car that runs quicker than a 12.00 is still in the faster half of stock eliminator, and Toby's G/SA is (even by alphabetical listings), one of the faster stocker cars known the nation over....just sayin'. |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winnin fasterg
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
After reading a thread that started 12-10-08 titled "Lower Class Stockers", I now realize that Kyle Riley finished Div. 3 in the top ten a few times (so the divisional half of my #3 referrence was wrong), and Mike Carr, now Bill O'Conner, & Kyle Riley have won divisionals with fwd cars.
As for my #4, comment, IHRA had a national event winner (per Brett Kepner), as far back as 1977! Dennis, when did Bill win that division race? Belated congrats to Bill for doing it! At least after reading that earlier mentioned thread, my points #'s 1, 2 & 5 (national events only), are still out there to grab, as well as #3 nationally, are still up for grabs. So there's plenty to shoot for, and if I'm not fortunate enough to do it, then I hope Mike, or someone else out there trying to get 'er done, with a fwd stocker will, because that'll be more significant given the higher degree of difficulty in such an accomplishment! |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Gary I think Bill won in the mid 90s. Also in IHRA I think Tim Sloan did very good with a cavalier.
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
A Cavalier Z24 with a stick won a Div race on the right coast in the 80s. Cannot remember his name - - - -
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Gary,Bill won his Division 7 race the same weekend I won at the Topeka Div 5 race in `96 with my V/SA Skylark. My old silver car.
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Bill Drevo won S/E at the 1985 Suffolk Divisional with a Z-24 Citation.
(had to join this thread ...sooner or later) |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
That would be an X-11
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
(That's what I get for getting "old"....BRAIN FADE!) But I do believe the RPO Code Z-11 was used after 1963 in various Chevy models.... |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
At least I remembered the driver ;-) |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
It was Tim Griffith in the Cavalier. He won multiple Pro-Am events, and missed the IHRA World Championship by just 2 points. (part of the season, he drove the Koopman's 9-seater wagon. X/SA?)
Congrats to Philbilly for another final round on Sunday at the Mt. Park Pro-Am... two wins and a r/u in the Borrowed Money! Awesome weekend, bud! |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
What happened last century was great, but how about this century? There's been many close calls, but who's won a divisional event (or an IHRA national since Y2K), because there's definitely been no NHRA fwd stocker winner yet), this century? Alot more happened in the 80's, and 90's than I realized, but how about since Y2K? |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Gary,
I believe the "mystery motor" was the canted-valve, new head-design, N.A.S.C.A.R. motor that we came to know as the 396/427/454 engine. The Z-11 was a 409 on steroids; angled top-deck block; a "combustion-chambers-in-the block" design with some really good-flowing heads and an intake manifold, the design of which emulated a tunnel-ram (raised carbs, with vertical runners delivering the charge to the heads.) A VERY powerful engine... The cranks may have had similar bearing parameters, and the bore-center spacing was the same, but they were two very different motors in terms of the top end. |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Quote:
|
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Gary,
You are correct that the 1963 427 Chevy engine WAS the Z-11. I should have made that more clear when I said it was a "409 on steroids." It was a 409 DESIGN that was enlarged to 427 cubic inches for the 1963 limited-edition "lightweight" drag package that Chevy built for NHRA racing. There were some problems getting them homologated; not enough cars were built before the G.M. front office issued an edict that killed the racing programs at both Chevy and Pontiac, resulting in not enough cars being built to qualify their legal status as Super Stockers, so they had to run these cars (the Z-11 full-size Chevys with the 409-style 427-inch motors, and the Pontiac 421 Tempests (dunno about the swiss-cheese Catalinas) as F/X cars. No matter; they were all still really, really tough! The "mystery motor" was not included in any of the drag racing activities that I ever heard of, in 1963. It was a canted-valve, 396-style "semi-hemi" whose excellent basic design is STILL making its mark in Pro Stock, Stock, and Super Stock today. It was a NASCAR item ONLY, in the beginning. Who'd have dreamed that it was so good that it would still be a factor in NHRA racing, virtually fifty years later? Hope this clears up the some of the murk about the two distinctly different big blocks Chevy was developing in 1963. They were both formidible! |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
They were both formidible![/QUOTE]
x2 for that Bill, and I often wonder what would've been in the Stock/Super Stock wars of the brands, if only that "409 on steroids 427 Chevy, and it's 421 Tempest cousin would've had the numbers built they needed to be a threat to the Savoy's, Belvedere's, and Coronets and their hemi or Max Wedge offerings??? |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
Gary,
It would have been VERY interesting... that's for sure! |
Re: Misconception on a slow stocker winning
x2 for that Bill....
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.