CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=16917)

John Kelley 04-08-2009 12:13 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 113766)
no, a bogus track is one where they subtract .4 from your ET and give you the record for it, even if the actual DA is sea level at the time

AND WHAT DIVISION DIRECTORS ALLOW THAT ???
Could you name some tracks and Division Directors that allow Tech to do that ??

Chad Rhodes 04-08-2009 12:18 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Kelley (Post 113786)
AND WHAT DIVISION DIRECTORS ALLOW THAT ???
Could you name some tracks and Division Directors that allow Tech to do that ??

ok the .4 was an exxageration. but you can set a record at an altitude factored track without putting the number on the board. and they are exempt from getting hit with HP. It is BS

Smitty 04-08-2009 01:40 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
This post is Bogus!!! Once again these cars have not done anything wrong but show potential. Robert Pond and Bobby DeArmond have been running nines for the last couple years and they haven't generated this kind of attention. Geez, this is ridicoulous!

bill dedman 04-08-2009 02:16 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Have either of them (DeArmond or Pond) ever run anything approaching 140 mph?

MPH is the telling number in drag racing. It is a lot more reliable as a horsepower-to-weight indicator than e.t. slips because bite will vary from track to track, and when the hook changes, so does the e.t., but the mph is a lot more constant, regardless of e.t. variations.

These cars have had very little development (track) time and are already running numbers that no one else can approach, with years of development. THAT is the problem; all provided by the 425hp factor that NHRA has bestowed upon them (and the 700+ horsepower they seem to be able to produce, at will.)

Given these circumstances. don't you think this situation is worthy of some discussion?

I do...

Bob Pagano 04-08-2009 02:27 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Hay Bill, What I really want to know is what was NHRA smoking the day they put that factor on the CJ's........I WANT SOME !

ALMACK 04-08-2009 02:34 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack McCarthy (Post 113511)
boy are they gonna pass me like im tied to a hitching post... hehehe

cant wait to dump my first one... boy i bet i can put him 2 cars out from mph cones to finish line :)

captain jack

Good one Jack... I LMAO when I read that !!

Where we bracket race 85% of the time I spend "dumping" the other driver at the stripe, so I hear where you are coming from. :)

Bruce Noland 04-08-2009 02:36 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Jack,
CJ at Atco to the 1/8 = 6.16 et @ 111.86 mph. CJ at Dallas to the 1/8 = 6.210 et @ 110.01 mph and 1/4 = 9.794 @ 140.17 mph. Looks like the CJ at Atco could have gone close to 142 mph.

Smitty,
It may look like Ford and Mopar have pulled this stunt off but heads have begun to roll over this mess. Things can still change. How will it hurt you, if these cars are moved to another class?

bill dedman 04-08-2009 02:44 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Bob Pagano asked: "... what was NHRA smoking the day they put that factor on the CJ's........I WANT SOME !"

The same thing they were smoking when they decreed that somebody driving a Stock Eliminator car needs to wear S.F.I. pants.... and that seat belts need replacing ever TWO years, when even NASCAR allows them to be used for FIVE....

art leong 04-08-2009 02:59 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Why is everyone so hung up on MPH. It's an elapsed time race not a high mph race.
Let's see what happens when they line up against another car in class. If they run too fast they will get hit.
I've built cars for the last 30 years and have always been short in mph. But (present car not counted) I've usually had the quickest car. Like my old partner Tex used to say "they blew by me at the last mph light (back when it was past the finish)

Jack Matyas 04-08-2009 03:09 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
How true Artie , how very , very true.......but at some point they'll learn to harness that MPH and turn it into ET ................

tex22 04-08-2009 03:11 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by art leong (Post 113838)
Why is everyone so hung up on MPH. It's an elapsed time race not a high mph race.
Let's see what happens when they line up against another car in class. If they run too fast they will get hit.
I've built cars for the last 30 years and have always been short in mph. But (present car not counted) I've usually had the quickest car. Like my old partner Tex used to say "they blew by me at the last mph light (back when it was past the finish)

I agree in a sense, but its also hard to back into a car going 140 past you. However besides Calvert who got a lot of breaks in Pomona these Cj's have not really went rounds in competition yet.

Chad Rhodes 04-08-2009 03:12 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by art leong (Post 113838)
Why is everyone so hung up on MPH. It's an elapsed time race not a high mph race.
Let's see what happens when they line up against another car in class. If they run too fast they will get hit.
I've built cars for the last 30 years and have always been short in mph. But (present car not counted) I've usually had the quickest car. Like my old partner Tex used to say "they blew by me at the last mph light (back when it was past the finish)

we know these guys are playing the system, we're using MPH to try and figure out HOW MUCH they are playing the system

Mike Gray 04-08-2009 06:57 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 113844)
we know these guys are playing the system, we're using MPH to try and figure out HOW MUCH they are playing the system

How Much? - My super-gas '69 mustang would run about 110mph in the 1/8 and it was capable of 9.40's in the 1/4. My car was lighter but by the 1/8 mile they already have that extra mass accelerating faster, how much difference would there be in the second half?

bsa633 04-09-2009 01:13 AM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Sorry ..little "off topic"

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 113766)
no, a bogus track is one where they subtract .4 from your ET and give you the record for it, even if the actual DA is sea level at the time

from anoter site:
The correction factor for Las Vegas is .9757

8.630 x .9757 = 8.42

--------------------
Jared Jordan
7551 SS/BA

just one example but alot of records are from "the strip"..C.W. was faster at the Dutch last fall than Vegas at the shootout..even with the factor..he's a good example because i think he's never "holding any".. may have developed over the winter also..so what would you like to do with E.T's from Atco,"Dutch" and Houston,Florida,"Alabama" made in the "winter"?

bill dedman 04-09-2009 01:39 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Art Leong asked, "Why is everyone so hung up on MPH. It's an elapsed time race not a high mph race."

That's true.
But, for purposes of engine output analysis, the e.t's can vary a lot depending on traction; mphs do not. That makes the mph figure a lot more reliable indicator of horsepower delivered to the ground.

You can make a run taking off in 2nd gear and it will absolutely KILL yout e.t., but won't affect the mph nearly as much.

These Mustangs are set up to leave very "soft" and for the mph they're turning, really should be running a lot quicker than they are... like 9.40's-9.50's. I'll bet their 60-foot times are nowhere near the 1.20s, where they should be.

But, the mph remains the reliable indicator of performance that tells HP output without much variance.

That's why people on here, who are trying to evaluate the output of these CJ engines, are "hung up" on trap speed. It's just the most accurate way to judge the potential of these cars.

Chad Rhodes 04-09-2009 01:44 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bsa633 (Post 113979)
Sorry ..little "off topic"



from anoter site:
The correction factor for Las Vegas is .9757

8.630 x .9757 = 8.42

--------------------
Jared Jordan
7551 SS/BA

just one example but alot of records are from "the strip"..C.W. was faster at the Dutch last fall than Vegas at the shootout..even with the factor..he's a good example because i think he's never "holding any".. may have developed over the winter also..so what would you like to do with E.T's from Atco,"Dutch" and Houston,Florida,"Alabama" made in the "winter"?

you put the number on the scoreboard, you get the record. thats a pretty simple concept. you mentioned houston, thats a a double edged sword. I've raced there in august/september in 4200' DA. where's the correction factor for 110% humidity and 104 degrees? THERE ISN'T ONE! and you shouldn't get a freebie record because you are at a factored track.

ALMACK 04-10-2009 10:06 AM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Gray (Post 113904)
How Much? - My super-gas '69 mustang would run about 110mph in the 1/8 and it was capable of 9.40's in the 1/4. My car was lighter but by the 1/8 mile they already have that extra mass accelerating faster, how much difference would there be in the second half?

Your car should run 146 mph in the 1/4 based on a 110 mph 1/8th.

There is a post on another forum where everyone posted both their 1/8th and 1/4 mph and I did the calculations. (Post # 64) Those are real world numbers.

1/8th mile per hour is usually ( but not always) 75 % of the 1/4 mile mph. In the last 200 feet of the 1/4 mile track, I would venture to say the rate of gain noses over, a bunch.

I study speed and distance as well as rate of gain ( as a hobby) in drag racing. :D

Anyway, here is a copy of everyones % of mph gain from the 1/8th to the 1/4 :

25.4 %
25.4 %
26.1 %
25.8 %
26.2 %
23.7 %
24.9 %
26.1 %
28.0 %
36.9 % ...?????
23.4 %
27.2 %
22.0 %
26.5 %
23.9 %
22.0 %
25.2 %
25.4 %
31.9 %
25.0 %
26.0 %
31.1 %
31.2%
32.7 %
24.4 %
26.0 %
29.9 %
24.5 %
15.8 % ...???
24.8 %
22.6 %
26.2 %
21.6 %
31.9 %
25.8 %
29.5 %
21.1 %
27.6 %
Here's the link:
http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=72186

Smitty 04-10-2009 11:02 AM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland (Post 113829)
Jack,
CJ at Atco to the 1/8 = 6.16 et @ 111.86 mph. CJ at Dallas to the 1/8 = 6.210 et @ 110.01 mph and 1/4 = 9.794 @ 140.17 mph. Looks like the CJ at Atco could have gone close to 142 mph.

Smitty,
It may look like Ford and Mopar have pulled this stunt off but heads have begun to roll over this mess. Things can still change. How will it hurt you, if these cars are moved to another class?

How will hurt me, will it will pull the 15 year old paint and 15 year old valves out if my cylinder heads when they leave me or come by heap. It doesn't concern me that they have that much potential because anything can happen on that starting line. If those guys get in SS/IA or SS/HA we will run, I have my car to have fun and I know what my capabilities are so I don't get uptight. Heck I am in Florida, if you don't know one of the fastest if not fastest at sea level non factored SS/IA cars is here and it belongs to Rick Brewer. I know I can't out run him so I don't worry about it, he's go me covered by a second.
My whole point is we all need to run our cars and not worry about the guy in the other lane, if he has to put a number on the window make him run his number.

442OLDS 04-10-2009 11:24 AM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Does anybody know if these AA/SA Fords are running LOCK-UP torque converters?

bill dedman 04-10-2009 11:51 AM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Lockup convertors are not legal in Stock unless they're the OEM actual piece, are they?

That's what I've always heard. I think these CJ's have aftermarket convertors in them, which would disallow lockup units.

Don't bet the farm on that; It's just what I assume, based on what I've heard.

stefan callender 04-10-2009 12:19 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Smitty (Post 114286)
How will hurt me, will it will pull the 15 year old paint and 15 year old valves out if my cylinder heads when they leave me or come by heap. It doesn't concern me that they have that much potential because anything can happen on that starting line. If those guys get in SS/IA or SS/HA we will run, I have my car to have fun and I know what my capabilities are so I don't get uptight. Heck I am in Florida, if you don't know one of the fastest if not fastest at sea level non factored SS/IA cars is here and it belongs to Rick Brewer. I know I can't out run him so I don't worry about it, he's go me covered by a second.
My whole point is we all need to run our cars and not worry about the guy in the other lane, if he has to put a number on the window make him run his number.

Brewer is fast, but I really doubt he is the fastest SS/HA or SS/IA.

bsa633 04-10-2009 12:35 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 114115)
you put the number on the scoreboard, you get the record. thats a pretty simple concept. you mentioned houston, thats a a double edged sword. I've raced there in august/september in 4200' DA. where's the correction factor for 110% humidity and 104 degrees? THERE ISN'T ONE! and you shouldn't get a freebie record because you are at a factored track.

But you think it should work the other way too right...no freebies when the air is an actual -1000-1500 or whatever it could turn out too...or?

Smitty 04-10-2009 01:50 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by stefan callender (Post 114307)
Brewer is fast, but I really doubt he is the fastest SS/HA or SS/IA.


Brewer's car can run 9.60's and 9.70's anywhere in SS/IA. Find a faster sea level SS/IA car. Case in point, he went 9.74 at Gainesville this year, who's been faster? The Fogle's have been 9.60's in SS/HA with their Camaro also.

Mike Carr 04-10-2009 02:06 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
The Worner's SS/IA ran 9.64 at Belle Rose in SS/IA this year.

Ed Wright 04-10-2009 02:09 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Angelo DiTocco runs pretty well.

It amazes me they can get those cars light enough to run H.

stefan callender 04-10-2009 02:22 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Wright (Post 114331)
Angelo DiTocco runs pretty well.

It amazes me they can get those cars light enough to run H.

Ed, thats because Ang cant get his car light enough to run HA, when he runs HA, he is ususally heavy for IA.

stefan callender 04-10-2009 02:27 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
There are others in the class that are fast, dont forget about the Bohanans.

Ed Wright 04-10-2009 04:14 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by stefan callender (Post 114336)
Ed, thats because Ang cant get his car light enough to run HA, when he runs HA, he is ususally heavy for IA.

I was wondering where I could take out over 300 more lbs. I can't quite get mine light enough for the top of I, for sure not H.

Thanks, Ed

Mark Yacavone 04-10-2009 04:24 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 442OLDS (Post 114295)
Does anybody know if these AA/SA Fords are running LOCK-UP torque converters?

Daryl
From what I've been told, the Automatic cars have C4 's in them. Near impossible to use a fluid actuated
lock up converter. If anybody is using a centrifical type lock up,..well that's been illegal for decades.

Shawn Blair 04-10-2009 07:02 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
What about the current SS/IA record holder? If you don't think he's fast at sea level your very mistaken! Ya.. ya... he set the record in Boise, there was a certain SS/AA car that set the record there in 2001 then came to Mission a few weeks later and ran quicker.

Shawn

Chad Rhodes 04-10-2009 10:11 PM

Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bsa633 (Post 114309)
But you think it should work the other way too right...no freebies when the air is an actual -1000-1500 or whatever it could turn out too...or?

i'm saying you play the hand you are dealt, and race in the air you are in. if you were in montgomery in 02 i beleive, you got -1700 feet, and ton of records were set. either you factor ALL back to seal level for the actual DA at the time run (regardless of whether the track's altitude is 5000ft or 5ft), or you factor NOTHING


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.