Re: Coyote blueprint specs changed
 

"The Coyote blueprint specs have been changed."

Maybe that should say...The Coyote blueprint specs have been corrected.

Question...Was the -1.20 under car at the D-1 race torn down and checked? If not, why not?

Re: Coyote blueprint specs changed
 

I asked that at the time. A photo was provided of the car in the barn with the throttle body removed.

Re: Coyote blueprint specs changed
 

Carbon Fiber Doors AND Optic Armor polycarbonate windows. Is it a coincidence that there are only 2 CJs in the country with these lightweight parts and they run out of the same shop?

Re: Coyote blueprint specs changed
 

I possibly have the same problem someone else did which led to these revelations. This is the piston Mahle sold me. Anyone happen to know if this is the one where the dome will hit the chamber unless it is a CNC chamber?

Re: Coyote blueprint specs changed
 

I believe the new approved cylinder heads are the 5.2 Coyote, GT350 cylinder heads. They are CNC ported and also have a larger valve.
They also have larger port runners.

Re: Coyote blueprint specs changed
 

The earlier heads are hard to find just like the SBC so these are the superceded heads. Nothing to look at here.

Re: Coyote blueprint specs changed
 

That is not what this is about, at all. No new heads were added. Some were taken away that shouldn't have been there to begin with though.

Re: Coyote blueprint specs changed
 

He was never for a lack of posts before. I am sure he will weigh in.....well maybe.

Re: Coyote blueprint specs changed
 

He's the brother of Jeff Hairrington who runs this combination with the CORRECT heads and is now the one holding the bag of horsepower that the other one got running the combo with the wrong heads on it.

Re: Coyote blueprint specs changed
 

Tear downs did no good because the tech dept protected one certain racer and allowed heads, pistons and other parts which were never produced or installed by the factory. We're talking about Stock where factory produced and approved components are mandated to be used by all competitors. When bogus specs get onto a TI form the person responsible should be held accountable. Keep digging and you'll be surprised. Not everyone will spend the time to look into this because they think it doesn't affect them because it's not the brand they race but how do we know if this is an isolated case? The more you look the more surprised you'd be. Even tech officials have been told to look the other way. Heads are not rare, like mentioned that's not what this is about. There's only nothing to look at here if you choose to look the other way.