Re: Ford 2.3? 250?
Rockwells car was a 2.0.
|
Re: Ford 2.3? 250?
Quote:
get the car to run low 15's in W...and maybe high 14's in V...at that time? |
Re: Ford 2.3? 250?
Quote:
|
Re: Ford 2.3? 250?
Quote:
|
Re: Ford 2.3? 250?
Quote:
|
Re: Ford 2.3? 250?
Did anyone ever actually use the 250? Nowadays that would be crazy when a 302 is factored at less HP. How did it get 145hp to begin with?
|
Re: Ford 2.3? 250?
Quote:
http://classracer.com/classforum/att...1&d=1389667149 Verne Buchanan's Mustang in the background! http://classracer.com/classforum/att...2&d=1389667149 |
Re: Ford 2.3? 250?
Quote:
Same reason people run a 302 but not a 351W 2bbl. Bad enough top end for 302 cubes let alone another 49! Not to highjack a thread, but Billy, didn't you say at one time even the bigger ports/valves of a 351M don't help and it's a bad combo too? |
Re: Ford 2.3? 250?
Quote:
I need to take more time when I post. Bruce Castle in the background too. |
Re: Ford 2.3? 250?
Quote:
Tom |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.