Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders
Quote:
Don |
Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders
I don't get it, 99% of you guys that are crying over this can't out run the top 5 guys with "traditional" cars anyway. You don't see Bobby D, Jimmy D or Joe Sorensen crying and fire selling all there stuff. I guess I might listen a little more if you were the fastest guy in the class but I don't think you are in the top 10!
|
Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders
Tommy, a friend of mine, Stewart Beckham, said hello.
You are correct my old Cuda never was fast, all of the class trophies must have come from yard sales. |
Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders
Tommy
I assume Bobby, Jimmy and Joe rarely post on the internet because they are working dilligently to stay on top of their game and stay competetive. Since you say you have not heard from any racers in the top of their class I felt compelled to reply .As you know, over the years I have tried to be fast and was occasionally rewarded with a record or three. Now you arn't really so callious to think these aforementioned front running racers and their" traditional" cars deserve to be rendered non competetive in heads up competetion by the new combos. All we accomplish by this is to force these beautiful old muscle cars away from racing and ultimately reduce car counts. This is not good for NHRA or stk/ss. I don't believe any real racer wants this kind of scenario, but only wishes a fair chance to win with his or her chosen ride. For some, "going with confidence" is not currently possible. I am confident NHRA want to reduce this disparity, and is working at this as we speak. Hope to see you and your dad this fall GP |
Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders
Maybe the nhra should have hired a 10 year old with a computer to sort this out before it happenned?
Can we all agree now that those with the knowledge do not have the power to deal with this, and those with the power, apparently do not have the knowledge to deal with this! How could there possibly be wool over the eyes of those blaming the factories? I do not for one microsecond believe that anybody in their right mind could have overlooked the hp ratings submitted to the sanctioning body!!! |
Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders
Quote:
|
Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders
Quote:
I don't remeber all the details, but when the GM fuel injectected cars came on the scene did they go directly into the "fuel Injected" classes to sort themselves out or did they originally go into the regular stock classes? Now, knowing that they did put them in their own classes for a while to sort out the HP ratings, why didn't the DP and the CJ do the same thing? |
Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders
Quote:
|
Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders
Quote:
|
Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders
Quote:
Don |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.