CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   .90 Heads Up Class Racing (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Race Issues... (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=26769)

Eric Olhava 07-02-2010 09:11 AM

Re: Race Issues...
 
I also agree on the first round on Saturday for S/ST.

sst3447 07-02-2010 03:39 PM

Re: Race Issues...
 
i also agree 1st round sst on saturday

bighead 07-04-2010 02:13 PM

Re: Race Issues...
 
Rock,

I am not in D3, but lets get rid of the 10.90 rule, and I hope in my division we can start running R1 on Saturday's? Thanks for starting this thread "Rock".:D

Bighead

Mark Schmidt 07-06-2010 06:10 AM

Re: Race Issues...
 
Several years ago I had a dragster with front brakes for static burnouts. I had a handle for the front brakes which made it great for unloading. They bounced me in tech at Pomona for a secondary braking system. I had to disable before they would pass me. Really dumb rule. (thanks John Force)

Joe Fuesting 07-06-2010 08:26 AM

Re: Race Issues...
 
1st rd for super street on saturday and allowing s/st drivers to race in a second class

Michael Pliska 07-06-2010 01:33 PM

Re: Race Issues...
 
How about lowering the weight limit for S/ST down to 2500 or 2400? As it was explained to me at the time by an NHRA official, the increase from 2500 to 2800 was to minimize the RT advantage of tube chassis cars back when they were on a 0.400 pro tree. Now that the tree is 0.500 it would probably be in everyone's best interest to not have 300 or 400 lbs of ballast on these 150+ mph S/ST cars...

luckydog 07-06-2010 02:27 PM

Re: Race Issues...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Pliska (Post 196407)
How about lowering the weight limit for S/ST down to 2500 or 2400? As it was explained to me at the time by an NHRA official, the increase from 2500 to 2800 was to minimize the RT advantage of tube chassis cars back when they were on a 0.400 pro tree. Now that the tree is 0.500 it would probably be in everyone's best interest to not have 300 or 400 lbs of ballast on these 150+ mph S/ST cars...

Great...........160 + mph SST cars :eek:

Bob Verwold 07-06-2010 02:49 PM

Re: Race Issues...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by luckydog (Post 196421)
Great...........160 + mph SST cars :eek:

Some aren't to far from that now !

Glad to see Joe changed Sun to Sat on first round for s/st

Barney B 07-07-2010 03:37 AM

Re: Race Issues...
 
I would like to see anything done that would shorten Sunday and get us home earlier.

I would like to see the hand brake rule removed, I had it installed on my new American as a safety item.

Thanks Rock, BB

Mackie Family Racing 07-07-2010 07:17 AM

Re: Race Issues...
 
Rock,

as one of the unlucky souls that (generally, uncompetitively) races an overweight, mostly steel Chevy II in SG because I want also to run SC, I'd support the recommendation from Alex and others to drop the "one class" rule for S/ST... I might have a chance to move from a 3-digit to a 2-digit reaction time in that case...

I don't, however, think it makes sense to invite more true (i.e., lightweight, tube chassis) SG cars to run in S/ST by lowering the min weight for S/ST. Need to give the little guys a chance to run without being 25-30mph slower on the top end than their competitor (like I am today in SG...). Also allows the local racer to run their bracket beater at a divisional event when the show is in town.

See you in Stanton.

srm


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.