Re: 4 wide is the answer
When the new cars start winning Stock Eliminator then you can throw rocks at them.
But like all racing, until it's run, you don't know who is going to win. I thought Doug Duell did a great job getting through 4 rounds of eliminations, but it only takes one loss on the way up, to be on the way out. Cars and drivers, new and old all have a chance. It is what gets done with those chances that makes the difference..... Frankly, I am still convinced that the older cars with lots of years of runs under them with a driver who is very experienced at getting everything out of them consistently are going to be winning for a long time. By then, the new stuff will correctly factored, and the world will be back at peace again. David The New Hemi Guy |
Re: 4 wide is the answer
I agree with Bryan. Why not run class eliminations 4 wide if the track is capable?
From what I understand, they don't run a weekly program there. I think they should use the 4 lanes to do qualifying, class run offs, and maybe the first couple rounds of competion for everyone. Then they should go back to standard drag racing to runs the last few rounds and focus more on the competition than the show. |
Re: 4 wide is the answer
David,
It's not about the new cars winning stock eliminator events. It's ALL about them winning heads-up races. If there were no heads-up races in eliminations, no one would care what HP ratings the new cars have. -Toby |
Re: 4 wide is the answer
[QUOTE=Bryan Worner;178637]I think it would be cool to run class 4 wide! What would be wrong with that? Get class in quicker, less runs on your car and done for the day at the track earlier! I had 7 cars in class at Charlotte! That would have been two rounds instead of 4!! They didn't even get to run the final because of weather! So where's the draw back there???
The problem with a lot of you is you are too stubborn to accept change! I'm sure some of the pros bitched about it because they seemed to have problems staging! But I'm sure they were instructed on how to stage, and some were just too bone headed to pick it up! It was fairly simple if you ask me! Why don't you ask some of our senior racers that may have raced 4 wide back in the day what they think?? Remember, this is not new. They did it at York and Budds Creek Bracket racing 4 wide........don't think you'll ever see that! But who knows.[/QUOTE Bryan,You won't see 4 wide racing,except at Zmax and MAYBE Vegas is Money Bags Bruton decides to spend the money.No other track will spend that kind of money on a whimsical proposition.Beside,the insurance hikes to the tracks would be absorbed by you know who,if they could even get that kind of coverage. The pros have a valid complaint.The current setup now has the possibility of racing the guy you beat twice in the final,and losing to him.How would you like to race under those conditions.It would be like havig buy backs.I know we all would love seeing that in S/SS. I saw 4 wide racing at NY National in the late 60s and early 70s.Jets,funny cars and the early pro stocks.My memory isn't that clear but I think Ed Eaton also ran some bracket stuff 4 wide.National was a pretty wide track though,but still not very safe. |
Re: 4 wide is the answer
[QUOTE=Ed Fernandez;178678]
Quote:
Old Ed Eaton saved a lot of trophies that way. |
Re: 4 wide is the answer
[QUOTE=art leong;178690]
Quote:
|
Re: 4 wide is the answer
[QUOTE=Ed Fernandez;178692]
Quote:
With wonderful NHRA in the final round of Seattle, they did everything they could to stop us from winning the W.R. Grace Cup. But the jerks didn't realize at Ontario there was never a full field so all we had to do was drive to the starting line to qualify and win the Cup. |
Re: 4 wide is the answer
Quote:
|
Re: 4 wide is the answer
[QUOTE=Ed Fernandez;178692]
Quote:
|
Re: 4 wide is the answer
[QUOTE=X-TECH MAN;178700]
Quote:
We ran the final round 3 times. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.