CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Best Mopar engine for SSGT? (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=121)

Greg Gay 05-25-2007 10:36 PM

RJ,

The 70 and 71 high compression 340's have a 2.02 intake valve. The 72 and 73 low compression 340's have a 1.88 intake valve. I am assuming heads with the 2.02 valve can flow substantially more air than the 1.88 with S/S style porting.

Charlie Walc ran one of the high compression 340's in S/S years ago. He said it was a fun car, but an expensive one.


Paul Precht 05-26-2007 12:58 AM

Hi Stewart, I'm not sure if the 67 383 AFB has the weights in the rear or not. I have flowed the one without the weights and it was 565 cfm. The AVS is 635 and the 70 Holley is 645. These are clean stock carbs I had laying around, The numbers are rounded to the nearest 5. If the intake will be custom made the Stage V head which is similar to the 346 and 452 would be the best bet. If you use a store bought mani the 906 head can be an advantage. I would stay away from the 67. Paul.


RJ 05-26-2007 06:17 AM

Quote:

RJ,

The 70 and 71 high compression 340's have a 2.02 intake valve. The 72 and 73 low compression 340's have a 1.88 intake valve. I am assuming heads with the 2.02 valve can flow substantially more air than the 1.88 with S/S style porting.

Charlie Walc ran one of the high compression 340's in S/S years ago. He said it was a fun car, but an expensive one.

Greg, for some reason NHRA says the 2.020" intake head requires the same intake port volume as the 1.880" valved heads, so I don't know there is much there once you sink the valve/fill in the floor. The piston is the only other difference, and I can get a piston weight at or below what the low compression 340's currently run.


George Mirza 05-26-2007 08:58 PM

Hey Paulie,
Sam Dillow is looking to contact you. Send me a message with a number he can reach you at.
Gmirza1236@aol.com


Greg Gay 05-26-2007 09:57 PM

RJ, you may be right. The port volume may be restrictive enough that the bigger valve makes no difference. I understand that the area closest to the valve is the most important, and as you move back upstream, it has less effect. I certainly have no first-hand experience doing any port work. Perhaps Paulie, who has been posting on this thread, might have some ideas.

RJ, do you run a late model GTO? If so, how fast is it, and what modifications have you made to it?



RJ 05-27-2007 12:34 AM





davyjones 05-27-2007 01:36 AM

I am not a mopar guy at all ... but it seems that wayne taylor , ken etter, Bob mazzolini have had pretty fast cars with the 318. i have no clue what year or car that combo is from .


RJ 05-27-2007 02:15 AM

Greg, e-mail me - carolinaperf@yahoo.com

Dwight Southerland 05-28-2007 08:57 AM

The '70 Holley on the Road Runner/Super Bee engine (335hp) flows considerably more than 645 cfm. The primaries are 1.562" (same as a 600 cfm carb) and the secondaries are 1.750" (same as an 850 cfm carb). I had one on my flow bench recently and it was well over 700 cfm.


roadrunnerrunner 06-12-2007 12:34 AM

Stewart, you may want to contact Jim Fitzpatrick in Orlando.He does a fair amount of heads ..all Mopar I think.He seems to be very knowledgeable and alwaya willing to help.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.