Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products
Quote:
Doug, Funny you say that, Mike D. worked for Dodge for 30 years and if you want free stuff from Ford you have to own a Dodge, race a Dodge, or build Dodge/Mopar engines. Jim D'Amore |
Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products
Quote:
|
Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products
Quote:
I don't know the difference but I do know NHRA calls it Stock Eliminator Showdown class. Even when it's announced, it's presented as Stock Eliminator showdown class. It started it's life in Stock Eliminator and the engine combinations are in the Stock Eliminator guide. If you take your Showdown Stock Eliminator car to a divisional race you can run it in Stock Eliminator. So every FS Stock Eliminator engine combination is legal expect for the Ford 5.4L 4.0L and the GM 327 4.0L combination. Mike D. and Roger Allen made that happen. Jim D'Amore |
Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products
Quote:
|
Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products
as an outside observer that's works in a dealership the answer to your question is far simpler than it may appear Ford has no desire to see a mustang win a "Factory Showdown Shootout" with an engine they no longer produce. no mustangs will be sold on Monday from a 5.4 win on Sunday diehard racers care but upper management just wont see the benefit
|
Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products
Quote:
|
Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products
Quote:
|
Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products
First off 2 different things Jim. DrJRacing said things are "more limited", when we know this year they are less limited than ever before.
Quote:
I'll just have to take your word for that I guess, but in reviewing the latest stats for this year and the end of year stats for last year, no one raced one in stock eliminator. Quote:
I'm aware it was posted as legal, for a very short time in the winter when there were no races, then removed. So, no one ever raced one. If someone spent money on one during that period, it's unfortunate. I agree that shouldn't have been made legal then not in short order. I think most would agree that it doesn't belong there when for years it was a SS only combo, just like the the 327/4.0 doesn't belong there either. Quote:
1. Who are you talking about? Again, I find no record of the 5.4/4.0 ever racing in stock eliminator. I hope you aren't talking about a Superstock car. 2. They can run their original 5.4/TVS combination, with weight break, everyone knows that. Quote:
Don't you think the very simple answer to that is the 4.0L blower, when the current situation is all 3 brands running a 2.9 blower and running close together? I don't think anyone wants the potential to revisit anything like the old days of Pro Stock where lead trophies had to be handed out in attempts to constantly level the playing field. |
Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products
The only reason it was not in stock when it came out, there was no weight break for it to fit into. There was no FS/AA class. I don't know, but i don't think the 5.4 combo is better than a 5.2 just because the sc is bigger. I also don’t think most will agree when you say most will agree...duh. Its in the guide so I don’t know what your point is. This thread is about ford giving then taking it back for un know reasons. I wish someone from ford would come on here and tells us why, is that to much to ask.
5.2 Combo bore 3.631 stroke 3.649 Piston- dome 12.5 CR Cam- .590 lift Throttle body- bigger than the 5.4 Valves- 2 -1.513 2 -1.285 RPM 9000 rpm+ supercharger 2.9 pulley size 3.25 inch ram air front entrance supercharger 5.4 Combo bore 3.553 stroke 4.166 piston- flat 10.5 cr cam- lift .473 Throttle body smaller than the 5.2 valves- 2 -1.462 2 -1.265 rpm 8200+ supercharger 4.0 pulley size 4 inch no ram air rear entrance super charger |
Re: Poking the Bear Ford Performance Products
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.