Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
Quote:
|
Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
I agree and disagree with some on all of this, but I have drove some under factored and drove some over factored horsepower race cars in what little time I have race stock and super stock cars and been on the top of the qualifying sheet and been a alternate to. Where I think nhra went wrong was putting fuel injection and carb cars together awhile ago to get away of so many classes. When you get down to it no matter if you have FI, Supercharge, or Carbs we are fill ins just look at the schedule change at indy because of the weather for the pros nhra could care less what we all complain about on here. Is that going to stop me from racing no I love it to much! The 1 thing that people need to remember is this world is driven by money and right now the car companies are making money by saleing these cars so that what is driving this. Also I can say is no matter if I had the money to buy a new copo or dodge or ford I can honestly say I would not because I like the old cars and driving them. just my 2 cents
|
Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
Quote:
|
Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
Quote:
|
Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
It is interesting that some complain about horsepower rating when the entire HP rating system in out of whack..... As an example....our Super Stock car is rated at 356 HP....yet it produces over 300 HP more on the dyno (and still slow).....similar for our stocker. So, it is my best guess, that a 396/375 stocker is around 630 HP on the dyno, but rated ......what?
|
Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
Quote:
I'm still slowly building my Ford, but with a small valve 428 I'll be classed the same. I can't see the Ford running anywhere close to the 6.4 if the 5.7 can go 10.10 in E. |
Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
Once again, after 12 pages of the same stuff, re-read Chuck Rayburn's idea on the first page. That is the answer (mine too). A few letter changes and they can be "FX","FI" or any other designation NHRA wants as long as they are not racing "heads up" with the older cars. In the event that NHRA does nothing to reclassify these cars and the "heads up" beatings continue (which they will in the current format), you all should start thinking about other ways to stay competitive (i.e.- lower the horsepower ratings on the older carbureted cars if they are forced to remain in their current classes.) I can't wait to see these very same posts in 10 years (if this stuff still exists) when the DP, CJ and COPO guys are complaining about the (then to be) new cars having too much voltage and making 1100 hp (and hooking) because they have bigger batteries and a 512 bit torque management processor with a 960 hz refresh rate.
|
Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
Quote:
|
Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
Quote:
|
Re: Stock Suggestion # 1
I thought taking 3 tenths off the indexes was supposed to fix everything? Fell for that one hook, line, and sinker didn't we?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.