Do you still need to go 50 under to win class?

[Tom Moock]

Topeka stock; p/sa and brainerd super stock gt/ma did`nt run under index and they . won class. Tom

[Ed Fernandez]

Originally Posted by Tom Moock

Topeka stock; p/sa and brainerd super stock gt/ma did`nt run under index and they . won class. Tom

I believe when they do that they don't get a wally or contingency $$.You're just called class winner.You won't get rich on the contingency anyway.
My point about the .001 under is that it used to be a big deal to win class,at any event.
Now they've dumbed it down to the point where it isn't a big deal anymore,except if it's your first.
I usually have single runs when I run class,due to the fact there was only one other T car in
Div. 1.That car only came out sporadically.Now I understand two more are in the works.I welcome the challenge.

[greg fulk]

Steve just go run him..... Everyone want to see a full out 1.10 under EF/S class final!!!

[blkjack]

Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez

Not for nothing but is that something to be that proud of?

Dan Fletcher was listed as class winner at Brainerd...less than a tenth under.
Is Dan a disgrace to class racing ?..or has this class win stuff become B.S.
(with the exception of Indy of course)

[Ed Fernandez]

Originally Posted by blkjack

Dan Fletcher was listed as class winner at Brainerd...less than a tenth under.
Is Dan a disgrace to class racing ?..or has this class win stuff become B.S.
(with the exception of Indy of course)

Please,Dan was that slow because he lifted early.Check out the MPH on class runoffs for an indicator of how quick a car potentially is.
You can stop rolling your eyes now.Crosseyedness is a result of eye rolling.:>):>)