HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Class Racer Builds
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-24-2012, 10:50 AM   #11
Ken Miele
Live Reporter
 
Ken Miele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,555
Likes: 345
Liked 13,006 Times in 1,223 Posts
Default Re: My 67 Shelby updates

Hey Rock,

I'm going to stick with the old 428. I know, I know I said was going to go with new technology, but I want to stay in stock. Besides, I still get to drive the new stuff, Anthony's 3 Valve CJ and The Hawk and Cook CJ.

I was spoiled when I was driving Anthony’s CJ, I love the inside cut off switch.
Ken Miele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2012, 11:04 AM   #12
CBS
VIP Member
 
CBS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Commerce, Mi
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: My 67 Shelby updates

Stock runs so early.....lol
CBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2013, 10:06 AM   #13
Ken Miele
Live Reporter
 
Ken Miele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,555
Likes: 345
Liked 13,006 Times in 1,223 Posts
Default Re: My 67 Shelby updates

I wanted to keep the back seat and the passenger seat stock, but NHRA had other ideas, so with that I decided to remove the back seat and completely remove the factory look of the seating.

When I was doing this project I kind of forgot about my build, so I did not take photos until half way through the project. The photo of the stock seat is not mine, looks to nice for my car anyway. I just wanted show what the stock seat looks like.

I used .040 aluminum along with a carpet material used for speaker boxes. I decided to fabricate, I could have bought a rear seat delete made out of fiberglass, but I would have had to cut it up to make it fit and they are very pricey.

The materials were less the $75 and it took about about a day to finish. I used cardboard to make a template and make the cut out for the tunnel. I used 3M adhesive to attach the material to the aluminum. I use four trim screws to attach the panels. I made it two pieces for easy removal and to make it fit. I would not have been able to fit it between the roll bar if it was one piece. The rear piece gives me access to the upper rear shock mounts, remove one trim screw and I get easy access.

The total weight savings for swapping out the factory seating was 60lbs.

All I have left is to clean up the factory panels and paint the roll bar. When test fitting the aluminum sheets it was hard not to hit the roll bar, lots of scratch's to fill.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	int5.jpg
Views:	474
Size:	160.1 KB
ID:	16668   Click image for larger version

Name:	3int.jpg
Views:	490
Size:	235.5 KB
ID:	16669   Click image for larger version

Name:	2int.jpg
Views:	604
Size:	297.6 KB
ID:	16670  

Click image for larger version

Name:	4int.jpg
Views:	630
Size:	285.5 KB
ID:	16671  
Ken Miele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2013, 02:06 PM   #14
Damn Yankee
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: My 67 Shelby updates

Ken I like it, looks like a clean install
Damn Yankee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2013, 08:21 PM   #15
Mike Gray
Senior Member
 
Mike Gray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 518
Likes: 222
Liked 498 Times in 134 Posts
Default Re: My 67 Shelby updates

Ken, that looks nice!
I have a question about your Shelby - Are you using the factory piece between the trunk and the passenger compartment, it looks like you may have changed it to an aluminum panel?
I think it's required when using an aftermarket fuel tank in the trunk?
I haven't gotten to my interior yet but I wasn't sure if I should use the stock pieces or build one out of aluminum.
Mike Gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2013, 11:05 PM   #16
Ken Miele
Live Reporter
 
Ken Miele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,555
Likes: 345
Liked 13,006 Times in 1,223 Posts
Default Re: My 67 Shelby updates

Thanks Yankee, the carpet is what makes it look clean. The aluminum does not have to be perfect and I'm far from being a good fabricator.

Mike, The panel in the back is factory and I think NHRA would be ok with it as long as it does not open like the way it came from the factory. If its fasten, I think your good to go. With that said, I do have another barrier made out of aluminum. its more to the trunk side.
Ken Miele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 08:20 PM   #17
joe176
Senior Member
 
joe176's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 601
Likes: 34
Liked 41 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: My 67 Shelby updates

Looks good Ken !!!! Great idea with the build section for posting.....interesting stuff !!!
__________________
Joe Franco SS176
joe176 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 08:46 PM   #18
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 31
Liked 67 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: My 67 Shelby updates

Good job Ken, I never realized that there was that much room in the back of my 67 Mustang. Looks real nice. Claude
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 01:46 PM   #19
Ken Miele
Live Reporter
 
Ken Miele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,555
Likes: 345
Liked 13,006 Times in 1,223 Posts
Default Re: My 67 Shelby updates

Here is my seat compliance update. I have installed a my "identical in appearance" seat. Now if only I could get my engine finished I could try out my new safety features.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20130517_130359_414.jpg
Views:	716
Size:	396.0 KB
ID:	19028   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20130517_130638_152.jpg
Views:	748
Size:	422.9 KB
ID:	19029   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20130517_130714_822.jpg
Views:	730
Size:	403.3 KB
ID:	19030  

Ken Miele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2013, 10:09 PM   #20
DrJRacing
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zimmerman, MN
Posts: 237
Likes: 17
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: My 67 Shelby updates

Kenny,
Are you sure the inside power shut off lever is legal and/or safe?
It is possible to imagine a car part or body part (ie a bent shifter support or the driver's leg, respectively) blocking this lever following a severe crash. This, in turn, could interfere with an outside safety official from successfully shutting off the power (to your fuel pump). On a convenience level it sure looks useful!
Doug Jonak
2012 SCJ SS/AAA
5268
DrJRacing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.