1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

[ALMACK]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Nah..Don't like it.
Get an 88 Notchback...97 hp...Falls way heavy in W , but if you build it right, you should be able to get it light enough.
Not sure if 5.13 would be enough gear though..Maybe ,at 2600 # ,with short slick

^^ I concur on the 1988.

I can't see that dual plug head and intake on the '92 making that much more power than the '88.
28 factored h.p. is a bunch when referring to naturally aspirated 4 cylinders.

The 2.3 without a hair dryer attached will need some high rpm to injest more air.