|
12-27-2023, 08:06 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: auburn,mi.
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
front suspensions on ss/modified
There was some discussion awhile back about allowing RWD cars(new stuff) some aftermarket parts on the front suspension.The rulebook clearly states NHRA accepted front suspensions except what are they? As the Copo program comes to an end,some of the parts will be more scarce.These cars have a lightweight front sub to begin with so can they be replaced with a tubular cradle like the FWD conversions?
|
12-29-2023, 05:13 PM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 39
Liked 167 Times in 47 Posts
|
Re: front suspensions on ss/modified
I called the tech department about four months ago to ask the same question. The answer: There are none.
It's ridiculous, really. The FWD cars can have almost any front suspension, including tubular A-arms. I pointed to Comp SM, where RWD cars can have aftermarket front suspension parts. For SS/Modified? No dice. It makes no sense....
__________________
SS/BS 1921 |
Liked |
12-31-2023, 12:28 PM | #3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
|
Re: front suspensions on ss/modified
Quote:
I addressed this rule 10 years ago in many ways and forms with NHRA, including sending pictures and section cuts of the OEM stamped engine crossmembers on late-model RWD cars and engineering analysis when I was trying to build my 1994 SN95 Mustang for SS/CS class. At the time, Bruce Balchelder supported the rule change of the same premise I used; Chromemoly arms and crossmember are structurally stronger than the stamped OEM parts, especially during a wheelstand. However, Danny Gracia shot it down, however, I have an email stating that it would be allowed for Comp Eliminator Super Modified and the reason I build the car for Comp Eliminator SM, which I ended selling unfinished. |
|
Liked |
01-01-2024, 02:25 PM | #4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 3,193
Liked 678 Times in 291 Posts
|
Re: front suspensions on ss/modified
I went through this with NHRA a while back with my SS/BS Barracuda (still in development and as I age becoming a garage queen).
Basically NHRA approved was stock suspension for cars that were originally RWD. I know there are usually two sides to every story but does anyone think allowing RWD cars to perform front suspension modifications the FWD conversions are allowed is a bad idea? I think the affected classes in Super Stock could be GT, Modified, and Modified Stock Thanks, Bill Lamb SS/BS 4340 |
01-01-2024, 05:42 PM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Auburndale,Florida
Posts: 201
Likes: 20
Liked 57 Times in 32 Posts
|
Re: front suspensions on ss/modified
Quote:
Last edited by Mark Ugrich; 01-01-2024 at 09:54 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
01-02-2024, 11:44 AM | #6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
|
Re: front suspensions on ss/modified
Quote:
On the other hand, Bruce thought I had made a strong case, and had provided the technical evidence and even engineering analysis that made sense. In the end, all I got was an email stating it was legal for Comp Eliminator Super Modified but not Super Stock Modified. |
|
Liked |
01-02-2024, 12:31 PM | #7 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 39
Liked 167 Times in 47 Posts
|
Re: front suspensions on ss/modified
Quote:
Unfortunately, reason and logic are rarely well received and reciprocated. Hope you had a Merry Christmas and a happy and healthy New Year.
__________________
SS/BS 1921 |
|
01-02-2024, 01:29 PM | #8 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 39
Liked 167 Times in 47 Posts
|
Re: front suspensions on ss/modified
Quote:
The FWD cars are given a significant advantage over RWDs not only from the standpoint of the front suspension, but changes to the frame, floor, tunnel and firewall. Most importantly, they're small, light and aerodynamic. RWD cars are inherently disadvantaged since they are larger, heavier and less aerodynamic. But we choose to run them. There will always be the Einstein's who say "then, why don't you just build a FWD conversion car?" As though that's a rational response or solution. Under the current rules, our cars are flat out penalized, which makes no sense, never mind creating better parity. Changes to the front suspension not only create a safer car, but removes weight and provides more manageable engine and header clearance. It can also provide room for a belly pan. The rule is bewildering.
__________________
SS/BS 1921 |
|
Liked |
|
|