HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2018, 08:25 PM   #1
Dragsinger
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 5
Liked 98 Times in 59 Posts
Default unequal four link for super stocker

Some years ago 3rd gen Camaros and Firebirds were built with short upper four-link bars. Ed Quay and others offered frame rails and other hardware to product those builds.

Question; is there any downside to the short upper bar? Does that design react/operate the same as an equal length four link?

If would be for a small block powered package with an ET range of 9.50's
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W
Dragsinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2018, 09:49 PM   #2
Alan Roehrich
VIP Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,904
Likes: 983
Liked 1,016 Times in 264 Posts
Default Re: unequal four link for super stocker

They tend to be on the violent side when used with a manual transmission or a transbrake, and a bit less friendly to tune. Footbrake cars that don't have a ton of torque or a lot of gear seem to work well.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2018, 11:56 AM   #3
Jeff Stout
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 53
Liked 652 Times in 252 Posts
Default Re: unequal four link for super stocker

Ed Quay built my Monte back in 85 with short upper bars. After a lot of playing with it then having a chance to play with equal 4 link bar car I found that any changes to short upper bar seemed like drastic large swings even though you moved 1 hole or changed ride height. The equal bar car when making the same changed seemed more tune able. The Monte worked well but maybe I didn't have enough knowledge back then to figure out little changes.
Jeff Stout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2018, 12:28 PM   #4
Jeff Niceswanger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 764
Likes: 579
Liked 830 Times in 290 Posts
Default Re: unequal four link for super stocker

We eventually had Kronenbitter cut out our short bar and converted it to long bar. Like the other guys said, short bars are touchy. For a bracket car that never changes anything,they would be dandy. Really no problem hooking them. But changes in ride height along with changes in tire diameter, makes a perfect acting car act stupid. You cant throw 150 lbs ( sometimes more), in and out of them, and not have issues....
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS
Jeff Niceswanger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2018, 05:36 PM   #5
Adger Smith
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 425
Liked 665 Times in 258 Posts
Default Re: unequal four link for super stocker

Larry,
The bars on my car are:
Top - 20" C-C
Bottom 22: C-C
The 4 link bracket on the rear end has an 8 deg forward tilt
off of vertical for the top mount.
You will probably have better luck with that than just a vertical on center
rear end bracket. My car liked it even though it shortened the top bar.
Call me if you want the mount distance off the C/L of the housing
and bar angles.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS)
Adger Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2018, 11:16 PM   #6
Larry Merk
Member
 
Larry Merk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 207
Likes: 25
Liked 221 Times in 108 Posts
Default Re: unequal four link for super stocker

Larry,

Trying to figure out how to adjust our suspension, we found this spreadsheet on the Internet which helped us understand why our car was reacting as it did. It answered a lot of our questions and allowed us to get our car to work pretty good. This same information is available in some of the chassis setup books available.

http://www.patooyee.com/calculators/4BarLinkV3.0c.xls
__________________
Larry Merk
Larry Merk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2018, 08:01 AM   #7
Dragsinger
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 5
Liked 98 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: unequal four link for super stocker

I appreciate everyone's feedback.

The reason for my question, I am looking at a 3rd gen Camaro that is fitted with the Ed Quay style link. That design is from the days when NHRA rules did not allow the floor to be cut for suspension install.

The upper bar is considerably shorter than the lower bar per the Quay design.

My research shows the Quay design is in service with successful racers.

Given this updated information, do y'all have any additional feedback?

Is the Quay design acceptable for a small block powered package running in the 9.30 ET range?

A trans brake launch with engine of about 650 - 670 horse?
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W
Dragsinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2018, 10:01 AM   #8
Aaron Allison
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: East Palestine, OH
Posts: 216
Likes: 4
Liked 141 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: unequal four link for super stocker

My SS/BM Cavalier has a short top bar style four link and we have never had any issues with it and it is very tune-able. We have run the car with a 500 HP GT motor all the way up to the 865 HP modified motor that we have in it today. I know a number of years ago a lot of guys were changing them out, but I think it was a little bit monkey see monkey do.
I know there are a ton of cars out there like mine. I wouldn't be scare of that set-up one bit. If building a car from scratch I'm not sure I would do it, but definitely not worth changing.
__________________
Aaron Allison 395 STK, 395 SS, 3395 SC
Aaron Allison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2018, 01:28 PM   #9
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,273
Likes: 25
Liked 510 Times in 200 Posts
Default Re: unequal four link for super stocker

Ed Quay told me Via Facebook just recently why he favored those short top bars and it made sense.

He felt equal length bars could get into a bind easier.

His dragsters used the same shorter top bar style 4 link.

My good friend has one and I know of others and they work well.


I had a short wheelbase Vega and it was originally a 3 link

It had extreme body roll using a trans brake and I cut it out and installed an Art Morrison 4 link with short top bars due to limited space.

Car worked fine and I ran as quick as 9.30 footbraking.....and used a trans brake for S/G .....

The next owner ran some 8.80's with it and added an anti roll bar and a strut front end to replace the a-arms that it was built with.....
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479

Last edited by Rich Biebel; 04-24-2018 at 02:19 PM.
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2018, 03:11 PM   #10
CMcAllister
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fulton County, PA
Posts: 524
Likes: 9
Liked 725 Times in 199 Posts
Default Re: unequal four link for super stocker

With hole spacing being the same on the chassis bracket, the shorter bar will be a much more drastic change when moving the front up or down a hole. It can go from too much angle to not enough, (too much change in IC location), with no way to split the difference other than a ride height change.

Also, the IC change throughout the normal rear housing movement will be much greater, depending on how much the rear moves. Even if you've found the sweet spot, this can still cause problems.

IMO, the short bars were a compromise for the situation at the time. The trend now is to make the adjustments finer, with smaller holes in brackets, tighter center-to centers, multi piece brackets allowing for 1/8" changes in location, and/or longer bars making this so.
CMcAllister is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.