|
10-09-2012, 08:56 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 326
Likes: 67
Liked 141 Times in 55 Posts
|
Ford Class Racers
Hi im planning out a 1970 or 1971 Torino Stocker and im thinking about what Ford engine would work best and what do you run in your Ford Stocker or Super Stocker and what would be the best bang for the buck?I keep thinking 351 Cleveland and what Tranny do you run and what works best?I keep thinking clutchless Liberty or plain Automatic?Im sure some Ford guys on here would enjoy discussing this or atleast im hoping you enjoy this topic? THANK YOU anyways
|
10-09-2012, 09:18 PM | #2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 245
Liked 939 Times in 259 Posts
|
Re: Ford Class Racers
I`m not sure if the Torinos were the same, but in the Mustangs, the 70s had to use the autolite 4300 carb, while 71 & up were able to use the aluminum intake and Holley 780. The 70 also had a smaller cam, so if you do chose a Cleveland, you may want to find a 71 grille. I always thought that the 429s were rated kinda high, but I believe they had some HP taken off not too long ago. I`m a stick guy, but those Torinos are pretty heavy.......
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
10-09-2012, 09:23 PM | #3 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,568
Likes: 350
Liked 13,172 Times in 1,236 Posts
|
Re: Ford Class Racers
If you can get NHRA to correct the Stock Car Classification Guide, the 429/375 rated at 360 would be a very good combo. It would a natural E car if you claim it as a Cobra Torino. The Problem is they don’t show the 375 engine. Having owned two of these cars, I know they came with the 429/375. What makes this a better engine than the 370 is the 375 gets a solid cam and 780 Holley. If you can get NHRA to correct the guide it would be an easy 8 under combo. The 71 Mustang with a 429/375 is rated at 360. This engine was available in all Torino’s, Mustangs, Montego’s and Cougar’s in 1971.
|
10-09-2012, 10:48 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 326
Likes: 67
Liked 141 Times in 55 Posts
|
Re: Ford Class Racers
Well im also considering Super Stock by the way if anything in Super Stock would be easier?
|
10-10-2012, 10:47 AM | #5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 212
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: Ford Class Racers
Forget SS unless you own a bank, Stocker's are enough of an expense to build. SS is over the top. Much cheaper to buy a car than build as you will soon find out.
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA |
10-10-2012, 11:35 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 667
Likes: 28
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Ford Class Racers
Quote:
In my humble opinion. If you aren't emotionally attached and haven't really invested anything in the ride you have you might be better off to find a later model Mustang and go SS/GT with one of the new pushrod paper motors. To me that would be the easiest and most affordable way of getting out there. But either way I would go with a stick if you want to have fun and enjoy the time going down the track. Now if your wife, girlfriend or daughter is going to be driving it then I would recommend the automatic. I'm in the process of building a 69 Fairlane Cobra 428 CJ 4 speed car to run stock with and these old cars are not the best avenue for a top notch competitive car against todays newer stuff. If this car didn't mean so much to me and my family I would definitely look into something else that the aftermarket supports and that would have a strut front end with a shorter wheelbase and more aerodynamic. Something to think about. But I do like the 70 and 71 Torino's. I race in a local Stick shift circuit with a friend of mine that runs a 70 1/2 Falcon which is the same thing as the Torino and he's got it working pretty good but these old cars are tricky and challenging at times. Best of luck to you.
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
|
10-10-2012, 11:45 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: moreno valley Ca
Posts: 264
Likes: 2
Liked 19 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: Ford Class Racers
What i did just this year was sold my 1969 mustang cj car and bought a ford stocker,and once i found out all of the things that were needed to to get this car to run like it does i am glad that i bought a car rather than trying to build one, the car's that run way under the index or really complicated and expensive.
|
10-10-2012, 12:03 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 326
Likes: 67
Liked 141 Times in 55 Posts
|
Re: Ford Class Racers
Quote:
|
|
10-10-2012, 01:17 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 667
Likes: 28
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Ford Class Racers
Quote:
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
|
10-10-2012, 02:05 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 326
Likes: 67
Liked 141 Times in 55 Posts
|
Re: Ford Class Racers
|
|
|