HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-22-2017, 01:28 PM   #21
Jim Bailey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 699
Likes: 17
Liked 571 Times in 107 Posts
Default Re: Is this a mistake?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charley Downing View Post
you guys better read it closer
FS is only for 2008-2017 COPO ,DP's and Cobra Jets (no Street cars)
1955-2017 Street cars stay in regular stock and superstock as they should.
And in typical NHRA fashion they stopped short in their rule proposal / writing, leaving a grey area for Racers to exploit ; What would have be wrong with :

FS is only for 2008-2017 COPO, Drag Paks, and Cobra Jets, identified by their production/build plate...( no street cars )
1955-2017 Street Cars with factory vin numbers stay in conventional stock or super stock (as they should) Show room Camaros, Challengers, and Mustangs with NHRA approved engine combinations included. All combos must meet NHRA's stock specs for year, make, and model, including suspension, and safety per the NHRA rulebook. *
* No COPO's, Drag Paks, or Cobra Jets in conventional (AA -V) stock classes.

Maybe that's a little to clear.

The problem with "Stock Elim " today is - it's not about doing the right thing, or correct parts, or even what's correct ethically. ... it's about what you can get approved. That's a simple money trail .... follow the money trail ... you'll always find your answer.
Jim Bailey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2017, 03:51 PM   #22
Andys dad
VIP Member
 
Andys dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arcadia, Ca
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 48
Liked 175 Times in 78 Posts
Default Re: Is this a mistake?

You guys are a little slow - kevin has been running the combination all year.

Wait until you find out what other surprises are lurking in the class guide.

Ford and Chevrolet will not be far behind.

Let the games begin.


Ron
__________________
time is our most precious resource, you can always make more money but you can never make more time
spend your time wisely with the ones you love - Ron Durham
Andys dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2017, 04:42 PM   #23
Barry Polley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vacaville Ca
Posts: 743
Likes: 651
Liked 554 Times in 229 Posts
Default Re: Is this a mistake?

Re: Is this a mistake?
You bet ur ***** it is. There is not an A car on the planet that can run with an FS car in AA or any other class. Write and Write NHRA some more. Bend some ears!
__________________
Barry Polley 758 A/SA
California- No place to race!
Barry Polley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2017, 04:53 PM   #24
Alan Roehrich
VIP Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 996
Liked 1,043 Times in 274 Posts
Default Re: Is this a mistake?

I'm not completely thrilled with the idea, but if it is a legitimate production street combination, a car that meets ALL federal emissions and safety standards, sold to the general public to be driven on public roads, put it in the guide to run regular classes.

The rules are the rules. Now, rate them reasonable. Not soft, but not so hard that no one will build one.

But the factory race cars need to be in their own division of Super Stock, or Comp.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2017, 05:05 PM   #25
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,417
Likes: 2,582
Liked 4,453 Times in 1,694 Posts
Default Re: Is this a mistake?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
I'm not completely thrilled with the idea, but if it is a legitimate production street combination, a car that meets ALL federal emissions and safety standards, sold to the general public to be driven on public roads, put it in the guide to run regular classes.
There you go.
The VIN thing is not even an issue to me. There are still plenty of 307 Cutlasses around with no VIN.

But... The (former FX) cars should go by the same exact rules as the pre- 2008 cars, of all makes and models.

I guess I'm not going to get an answer to my previous questions. I also guess that IS the answer.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2017, 06:54 PM   #26
Pistol Pete
VIP Member
 
Pistol Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Punta Gorda Isles, Fl.
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 2,833
Liked 688 Times in 182 Posts
Default Re: Is this a mistake?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
I'm not completely thrilled with the idea, but if it is a legitimate production street combination, a car that meets ALL federal emissions and safety standards, sold to the general public to be driven on public roads, put it in the guide to run regular classes.

The rules are the rules. Now, rate them reasonable. Not soft, but not so hard that no one will build one.

But the factory race cars need to be in their own division of Super Stock, or Comp.
I looked up a 2015 Camaro in the class guide. If they came with a V6 to be street legal, how come these engines are not in the guide to run in a Regular Stock Class ???
I think that ALL CARS NEWER than 2008 should be in an FS Class.
__________________
"Pistol" Pete Dutko
Pistol Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2017, 06:56 PM   #27
mtkawboy
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Billings Mt
Posts: 279
Likes: 121
Liked 54 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: Is this a mistake?

There are cars with a VIN in factory stock too
mtkawboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2017, 07:44 PM   #28
Nmbr1GMfan
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 1,197
Liked 1,957 Times in 492 Posts
Default Re: Is this a mistake?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pistol Pete View Post
I think that ALL CARS NEWER than 2008 should be in an FS Class.
Why?
Nmbr1GMfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2017, 10:56 PM   #29
bigshow2966
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 616
Likes: 390
Liked 81 Times in 35 Posts
Talking Re: Is this a mistake?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andys dad View Post
You guys are a little slow - kevin has been running the combination all year.

Ron
Is this the pink car with the 392 in it?
bigshow2966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2017, 12:00 AM   #30
dartman
Member
 
dartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N.S. CANADA
Posts: 498
Likes: 155
Liked 68 Times in 41 Posts
Default Re: Is this a mistake?

I was told by a d1 tech that no drag pak car could race in conventional stock with a conventional stock motor because of the front suspension is not the same as the cars coming off the production line .
__________________
1231 FS/D Drag Pak
1231 E/SA 71 Demon
Kelly MacKay

Last edited by dartman; 04-23-2017 at 08:13 AM.
dartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.