|
02-02-2018, 11:32 AM | #21 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 3,066
Liked 6,730 Times in 1,512 Posts
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Just an FYI, when you're looking to find out what was REALLY available on these cars, look at the B-J and Mecum cars. I'd love to hear the sellers explanation for the LD340 on his mint, super low mileage 71 Demon when he's asking 40 or 50 K for it.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS Make tech "TECH" again! |
Liked |
02-02-2018, 01:18 PM | #22 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 1,012
Liked 761 Times in 225 Posts
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Steve, you are correct. The '66's never came off the assy. line with hood scoops. -Al
__________________
"That'll never work....." |
Liked |
02-02-2018, 01:23 PM | #23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Md
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Weren't all those WO/RO cars 2dr hdt's, not post sedans?
|
Liked |
02-02-2018, 02:21 PM | #24 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Western PA
Posts: 417
Likes: 5
Liked 228 Times in 120 Posts
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Quote:
amxron, Correct. The '67 R/W cars were hardtops only. Belvedere II, and Coronet 440's. |
|
Liked |
02-02-2018, 02:22 PM | #25 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 52
Liked 704 Times in 176 Posts
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
The Chrysler contingency has the ability to get NHRA to see history through their eyes.
__________________
|
Liked |
02-02-2018, 03:17 PM | #26 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 348
Likes: 543
Liked 338 Times in 73 Posts
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Quote:
I told him then I wasn't buying it, and still don't. I like mopars a lot, having owned a bunch and raced a few. But I like the idea of keeping to the rules even more. |
|
02-02-2018, 07:00 PM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Iowa
Posts: 209
Likes: 423
Liked 210 Times in 88 Posts
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Was not my intention to open a can of worms. Anyway, had a thought. With the over the top FS cars here to stay how about an FX (factory experimental) stock class. All vintage combinations currently running in SS/AH-D combine into one 6.5 lbs/HP stock class stick/auto heads-up. Stock rules. Not sure what/how HP would be determined.
__________________
Phil Vos |
02-03-2018, 07:14 PM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 225
Likes: 165
Liked 109 Times in 48 Posts
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
All you proud GM boys can look in the mirror. Your beloved NHRA allows plenty of "items" to be used when they never were available. And you know it, so quit you cherry picking. Teenage daughter is at her moms for the weekend and I don't need to hear it here. Thanks.
|
Liked |
02-04-2018, 02:12 PM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 557
Likes: 29
Liked 46 Times in 31 Posts
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Quote:
like the "famous" lady said, "what difference does it make" Mike |
|
02-04-2018, 06:20 PM | #30 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,392
Likes: 2,563
Liked 4,412 Times in 1,683 Posts
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
No...like the famous lady said "Never mind"
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|