HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-25-2018, 09:37 PM   #81
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Default Re: Proposal and NHRA and IHRA Responses

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cantlay View Post
The concern I have for combining stk/auto records is the weight break for auto's in the modified classes. All cars or trucks running a full auto may remove up to 5% or 250 pounds. Stick cars have to run the stated pounds per cubic inch. Perhaps have all cars run the same pounds per cubic inch.
We are a small number of cars but I would like to remain in Super Stock.
I believe the clutchless 5 speeds are a tenth quicker then any automatic. Just my experience. At the same weight.
__________________
don,t have one

Last edited by randy wilson; 02-25-2018 at 09:39 PM.
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 11:16 AM   #82
Senior moment
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Lorain Ohio
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Proposal and NHRA and IHRA Responses

Ed, Thanks for doing all the "leg work" to get these ideas on the table. We all will have to see where they go at NHRA's end. I agree that a lot of this could be applied by NHRA at no cost. Someone brought up the cost to them for Teardowns...valid point. I for one would be willing to pay a reasonable fee at teardown...maybe $50.00. to go through teardown and be certified as legit. Maybe the $300-500 they would collect would be enough so they do not resent the time involved. Again thanks for your efforts!!
Senior moment is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 11:59 AM   #83
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 1,078
Liked 180 Times in 110 Posts
Default Re: Proposal and NHRA and IHRA Responses

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senior moment View Post
Ed, Thanks for doing all the "leg work" to get these ideas on the table. We all will have to see where they go at NHRA's end. I agree that a lot of this could be applied by NHRA at no cost. Someone brought up the cost to them for Teardowns...valid point. I for one would be willing to pay a reasonable fee at teardown...maybe $50.00. to go through teardown and be certified as legit. Maybe the $300-500 they would collect would be enough so they do not resent the time involved. Again thanks for your efforts!!
Suggested this to IHRA.
Create an efficient quick Certification process...!
Develop a Mobile Certification Vehicle and/or select Fixed Centers to meet at.
Schedule a Teardown Date on a non race day where everyone can meet.

Make it systematic and quick.
Start with Chassis and Safety.

Engine Teardown: Pull Engine and Trans.
Put on a Framed Pallet to work on efficiently.
Assemble and reinstall.
Allow other racers to help each other.

If something needs changing to pass, fix and certify.
Sometimes the part will require machining or needing a tool.
Identify those businesses ahead of time to help.

Later in the year if a part has to be replaced. Check and recertify.

Certified cars will make cursory inspections a breeze and more relaxing race weekends.

Allows more racers to set National Records for bragging rights.

Like the idea of paying a teardown fee to help pay for trained specialists.
Which seems to be lacking based on racer feedback.
Do once a year and get it over with.

Dan

Last edited by Dan Fahey; 02-26-2018 at 12:03 PM.
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.