HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-02-2017, 06:44 PM   #1
Tom Moock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default Question on Hoods

If 69 Camaro`s have to run correct hood, Why don`t 69 Chevelle with 396 have to run correct Super Sport hood? All 396, 325 hp. & 350 hp. came only SS from the factory.
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK
Tom Moock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 08:00 PM   #2
Painter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 227
Likes: 4
Liked 161 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Question on Hoods

I dont even see SS listed for 69 Chevelles. It lists sport, but it also lists that for a four door. Irregardless to that, there is no advantage one way or the other on the Chevelle hoods. The cowl hood on the 69 Camaros on the other hand provides additional clearance over the carb.
Painter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 08:15 PM   #3
larrylomascolo
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ontario,canada
Posts: 438
Likes: 62
Liked 64 Times in 28 Posts
Default Re: Question on Hoods

No fresh air advantage with 68,69 chevelle s,louvers are for looks only
larrylomascolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 09:02 PM   #4
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 2,578
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
Default Re: Question on Hoods

Quote:
Originally Posted by larrylomascolo View Post
No fresh air advantage with 68,69 chevelle s,louvers are for looks only
Larry, That would not be the point here.
Try running a 67-69 Camaro or a 68 Chevy II or a 69 Nova, 350/300/295, without the fake louvers /vents on the hood, and let me know how far you get.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 10:29 PM   #5
Monte Howard
Member
 
Monte Howard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Potomac,IL
Posts: 268
Likes: 1
Liked 48 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Question on Hoods

I have a 67 Camaro with 295/350 the louvers on my hood are for looks only. They do nothing.
__________________
Monte Howard 3209 STK, 3208 SS
Monte Howard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 11:19 PM   #6
Jody Lang
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 299
Likes: 28
Liked 81 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: Question on Hoods

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Larry, That would not be the point here.
Try running a 67-69 Camaro or a 68 Chevy II or a 69 Nova, 350/300/295, without the fake louvers /vents on the hood, and let me know how far you get.
Mark, in this 2017 version of rules enforcement, what exactly would they do? Just curious....
Jody Lang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 11:39 PM   #7
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 2,578
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
Default Re: Question on Hoods

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jody Lang View Post
Mark, in this 2017 version of rules enforcement, what exactly would they do? Just curious....
Yeah, I know . I was going to make a similar comment.
Thought I'd just post what was, in the good old days.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2017, 07:14 AM   #8
Alan Nyhus
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 1,012
Liked 761 Times in 225 Posts
Default Re: Question on Hoods

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Larry, That would not be the point here.
Try running a 67-69 Camaro or a 68 Chevy II or a 69 Nova, 350/300/295, without the fake louvers /vents on the hood, and let me know how far you get.
Mark, you didn't need the Super Sport option for any of the small blocks in the '68 and up Novas. The Super Sport package was an added option, not a requirement with any of the small block engines. Therefor, a louvered hood hood is not a requirement for a small block Nova of that vintage. -Al
__________________
"That'll never work....."
Alan Nyhus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2017, 09:04 AM   #9
James Perrone
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 2,927
Liked 1,605 Times in 375 Posts
Default Re: Question on Hoods

Is this the Golf Channel. Monday morning quarterbacking
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK
James Perrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2017, 12:15 PM   #10
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 2,578
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
Default Re: Question on Hoods

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Nyhus View Post
Mark, you didn't need the Super Sport option for any of the small blocks in the '68 and up Novas. The Super Sport package was an added option, not a requirement with any of the small block engines. Therefor, a louvered hood hood is not a requirement for a small block Nova of that vintage. -Al
Alan, Painter , I believe you are correct about the Novas, now that I think about it. The SS louvers are the same part as the ones on the 67 Camaros.

My friend, back in the 70's, had a 68 Camaro, 350 / 295 , base model , Powerglide, column shift, bench seat , small hubcaps. It had the square vent looking things on the hood.
I'll stand by my comment about Camaros.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.