|
09-16-2020, 07:58 PM | #11 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Black Creek, BC Canada
Posts: 312
Likes: 62
Liked 137 Times in 67 Posts
|
Re: new swap firing order camshaft
Quote:
On a dual plane, this would be alternating between planes so why would there be an issue? Jim Mantle V/SA 6632 |
|
09-17-2020, 09:50 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 421
Likes: 94
Liked 84 Times in 33 Posts
|
Re: new swap firing order camshaft
I spoke with Chris at Bullet and he said no benefit on power for a Stocker setup.
__________________
Bobby Lundholm 3516 G/SA |
Liked |
09-17-2020, 01:55 PM | #13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
|
Re: new swap firing order camshaft
When intake runners are designed, the location of the planes and fuel/air distribution of the intake are based on the firing order pulses, especially for torque and low end power. The runner length, size and height are not always the same on OEM dual plane intakes. A changed firing order also may effect the location of the primary tubes on the exhaust collector.
|
Liked |
09-19-2020, 10:14 AM | #14 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 434
Liked 676 Times in 260 Posts
|
Re: new swap firing order camshaft
Bobby, if you spoke to Chris then you probably spoke to the real "Father" of the swap. First one I had was back in the 70's from Lunati (M/P tunnel Ram application) and I was later told he was the brain child. I never have ask if that was really the case. Guess by now it doesn't matter who gets the "Father" tag because all the companies have turned it over to the marketing Guys.
BTW if you guys take time to trace the firing impulses vs the runner locations on dual plane intakes you should be able to see how the change just causes more induction problems on most dual planes.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
Liked |
|
|