Question about eliminations in Stock and Super Stock

[68Coupe]

I am a bracket racer put a big fan of class racing.
I know you qualify and you have the ladder that determines who you run, but my question is how do you decide who runs which lane. When we come to staging we either pull in right of left lane, how does that work for you.

[B Aceves]

Originally Posted by 68Coupe

I am a bracket racer put a big fan of class racing.
I know you qualify and you have the ladder that determines who you run, but my question is how do you decide who runs which lane. When we come to staging we either pull in right of left lane, how does that work for you.

Most guy's flip a coin for lane choice if someone has the same lane preference.

[Mark Yacavone]

Let me add that the cars are paired up in the back of the staging lanes. Once they pull forward ,the drivers have already decided which lane they want.
NHRA doesn't care, one way or the other.
Also , the bye run car has the option of running first or last.

[Ed Wright]

I'll probably get hammered for this, but I think the higher qualified car should get lane choice.

That, along with qualifying points for the top ten or so, might help some softer combos get "adjusted" quicker.

Fire away.

[Alex Denysenko]

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

I'll probably get hammered for this, but I think the higher qualified car should get lane choice.

That, along with qualifying points for the top ten or so, might help some softer combos get "adjusted" quicker.

Fire away.

IHRA used to do it that way Ed.
Up until a few years ago until some guys started crying and they changed the rule.

[DBi Racing]

Ed makes a great point. The AHFS will work better when the "soft" combos have some incentive/purpose to let it all hang out. If they are allowed to continue to run and hide, then the AHFS will never work no matter what the trigger points are. I propose the following, so SRAC listen up:

#1) The pairings should be more like the pro pairings, or the format that the NCAA uses: 1 v 128, 2 v 127, 3 v 126, etc. This will prevent guys from running 1000' and placing themselves in the middle of the qualifying sheet run the cars that can't run their index. This would give the reward to the #1 qualifier to either have a bye or a car that can't run the index if that is the case.

#2) The higher qualified car should have lane choice. I could go with that for the whole race, or just first round and then go on best package or best RT from the previous round.

#3) Give bonus points for qualifiying like they did with the pro classes last year. Maybe give it to the top 10. A round of racing is a big deal and this would make qualifiying worth a little more when those racers fighting for a championship know they can make up some ground in qualifiying.

#4) I am sure this is the toughest one, but find a sponsor willing to put up money for qualifiying #1 or #1-5. I know contigency sponsors are dropping like flies, but it is just a thought.

Bill Lent
O/SA 3158

[Ed Fernandez]

Originally Posted by DBi Racing

Ed makes a great point. The AHFS will work better when the "soft" combos have some incentive/purpose to let it all hang out. If they are allowed to continue to run and hide, then the AHFS will never work no matter what the trigger points are. I propose the following, so SRAC listen up:

#1) The pairings should be more like the pro pairings, or the format that the NCAA uses: 1 v 128, 2 v 127, 3 v 126, etc. This will prevent guys from running 1000' and placing themselves in the middle of the qualifying sheet run the cars that can't run their index. This would give the reward to the #1 qualifier to either have a bye or a car that can't run the index if that is the case.

#2) The higher qualified car should have lane choice. I could go with that for the whole race, or just first round and then go on best package or best RT from the previous round.

#3) Give bonus points for qualifiying like they did with the pro classes last year. Maybe give it to the top 10. A round of racing is a big deal and this would make qualifiying worth a little more when those racers fighting for a championship know they can make up some ground in qualifiying.

#4) I am sure this is the toughest one, but find a sponsor willing to put up money for qualifiying #1 or #1-5. I know contigency sponsors are dropping like flies, but it is just a thought.

Bill Lent
O/SA 3158

Glendora is too lazy to do these things,especially #2.
#4 may be workable.
All good ideas.

[442OLDS]

Originally Posted by DBi Racing

Ed makes a great point. The AHFS will work better when the "soft" combos have some incentive/purpose to let it all hang out. If they are allowed to continue to run and hide, then the AHFS will never work no matter what the trigger points are. I propose the following, so SRAC listen up:

#1) The pairings should be more like the pro pairings, or the format that the NCAA uses: 1 v 128, 2 v 127, 3 v 126, etc. This will prevent guys from running 1000' and placing themselves in the middle of the qualifying sheet run the cars that can't run their index. This would give the reward to the #1 qualifier to either have a bye or a car that can't run the index if that is the case.

#2) The higher qualified car should have lane choice. I could go with that for the whole race, or just first round and then go on best package or best RT from the previous round.

#3) Give bonus points for qualifiying like they did with the pro classes last year. Maybe give it to the top 10. A round of racing is a big deal and this would make qualifiying worth a little more when those racers fighting for a championship know they can make up some ground in qualifiying.

#4) I am sure this is the toughest one, but find a sponsor willing to put up money for qualifiying #1 or #1-5. I know contigency sponsors are dropping like flies, but it is just a thought.

Bill Lent
O/SA 3158

Good post.
It is always good to hear intelligent thoughts,but number 1 was tried and was quite amusing.It was a "good spot" to be in the final qualifying position because if you took out the number 1 qualifier,you could then get a bye run.
I am pretty slow as it is,so I am usually right there.But I remember several years ago where drivers would shut their car off at the 60 ft clocks and slowly idle down the track TRYING to get the last qualifying position!
If somebody ran 20.00 seconds,somebody was "trying" for 21 seconds to be SLOWER.
Maybe if you had to at least run the index to qualify it would work,but thats about the only way.

[Bobby DiDomenico]

Originally Posted by DBi Racing

Ed makes a great point. The AHFS will work better when the "soft" combos have some incentive/purpose to let it all hang out. If they are allowed to continue to run and hide, then the AHFS will never work no matter what the trigger points are. I propose the following, so SRAC listen up:

#2) The higher qualified car should have lane choice. I could go with that for the whole race, or just first round and then go on best package or best RT from the previous round.


Bill Lent
O/SA 3158

Bill,

When IHRA had the qualifying list determined lane choice you could run 8 flat in I/SA and a guy who ran 14.50 in A/S the round prior still had lane choice if he qualified better. There was no incentive to run cars out (kinda like the current 1000' qual.) but maybe a better way would be you have to run the index or you don't even get a coin flip?

Only a random computer generated first round ladder would end the games. And if cars are not running past 1000' why waste time, adding a day to the event, and discourage the few spectators sitting in the stands? My guests have many times asked why not one time run and begin eliminatioons?

[art leong]

Pay something for number one qualifier. Make it worth your while to get index or horsepower.