HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-27-2007, 11:22 AM   #1
ericsz
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Slide a Links VS CalTracs.....

Which do you prefer and why for a 69 Camaro...Thanks!
ericsz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 01:04 PM   #2
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
Default Re: Slide a Links VS CalTracs.....

Street, use the Slide-A-Link. Race, use Caltracs...
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 01:15 PM   #3
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Slide a Links VS CalTracs.....

I've seen some Camaro forums were there are pictures of some mangled slide-a-links. Not pretty.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 02:04 PM   #4
ericsz
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Slide a Links VS CalTracs.....

Here is why I ask, I run slide a links it is a race only 1/8th miler, I just bought a new converter and the car just doesnt work now, it really only worked well with near perfect track conditions, I went with a Coan 8 inch 45-4800 converter my suspension is as follows, Koni SPA1 in the front with the lightest rate trick spring with Rancho 9 way adjustables in the rear, Afco multi leafs and CE Slide a links, 28x9-15 tire . On a good day the car was pullin the wheels about 8 inches witht the 10 inch converter, car thinks about hooking then goes away. what can I do?? I have the fronts set to 3/4 full stiff, and the rears set on #7, I tried the fronts on full soft with the 10 inch converter and the front end was coming up way to fast and unloading the tires. Please advise.
ericsz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 04:08 PM   #5
Mike Pearson
VIP Member
 
Mike Pearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,321
Likes: 546
Liked 1,629 Times in 502 Posts
Default Re: Slide a Links VS CalTracs.....

Eric,

You will need to run the shocks on the loose setting on a less than perfect track. try putting a rubber snubber on the top A arm where it hits the frame. This will help to soften the top of the travel. The rear shocks should be lose also on a slick track. How many runs on your tires? With your motor combo and the small tire that you are running the tires will need to be fresh. I only get about 40 - 50 runs on a set of tires on my super stocker. I use M/T 12.5X31.25 radials. You might try a 10.5 X 29.5 tire on your car. I ran that tire before I tubbed my car and built it into a super stock car. If you are using a trans brake lower the leave RPM to soften the initial hit. Have fun!

Mike
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS
Mike Pearson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 07:54 PM   #6
Arnold Greene
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Slide a Links VS CalTracs.....

I tested the first slide-a-link on a stick car, and believe me, it was ugly. Moroso worked with me, and I believe the later version slide-a-links are very good. The front bracket needed to be made from heavier material, and the rear plate also needed to be thicker material. In A/S, 3570 pounds, I have been mid 1.30s on a decent track. In AA/S, just over 3200 pounds(because I can't get to minimum wt.), I have been 1.29 on 9 inch GY's and 10.5 MT's. I don't have first hand experience with the Calvert bars, but I think you can get more adjustment(pre-load, side to side balance, etc.) with the slide-a-link. It is very easy to get either of these in a bind, if you stiffen the shocks too much. BTW, the Calvert split spring is great.
__________________
Arnold Greene
IHRA/NHRA 2420 A/S, B/S
Arnold Greene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 07:58 PM   #7
Grant Eldridge
Member
 
Grant Eldridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Slide a Links VS CalTracs.....

Eric,
I run the slide-a-link on my Nova stocker, but modified them by replacing the main bar with a length of steel tubing threaded in each end to accept the rod ends. A further improvement could be made by getting one new reverse threaded end and making it a finer adjustment. On my car they work best with a neutral setting on the drivers side (with driver in the car) so you could slide the bolt in easily, and 1/2 turn of preload on the right. By the way, I placed a 1/2" aluminum plate between the spring and the slide-a-link bracket because the bracket was bending when I tightened the U-bolts. This drops the back of the bar a bit but it seems to work well and has stayed put. Using the Hoosier radials C06 9"x30 tires at 21 lbs, our best 60' has been 1.41. The biggest improvement came from running more tire pressure in the radials, rather than less. Car weight is 3570 with driver. Front springs are light Moroso, front shocks are 90/10. Hope this helps....
Grant Eldridge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 10:11 PM   #8
Bob Gullett
VIP Member
 
Bob Gullett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 42
Liked 414 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: Slide a Links VS CalTracs.....

I run the Cal Tracs on the Nova (327 G/S) with the split springs and they seem to work well. I was using their supplied shocks (Ranchos). I just changed them to a QA1 double adjustable hoping to get the car to leave better. Not sure what to adjust them to but I'm sure I'll figure it out.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S
Bob Gullett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2007, 12:20 AM   #9
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Slide a Links VS CalTracs.....

Bob,
If the track is good on your first outing with the new shocks, start at mid-point on extentsion and keep going stiffer. I think your goal should be to see how stiff you can get them on a typical day at a typical track. That should be your baseline. In killer conditions, add to that baseline. In crappy conditions you'll be amazed to find going full opposite will save the day.
I'm re-valving my AFCO rears so that lightest extentsion setting will be 3 sizes stiffer than it is now with stiffest being +3 over what it is now. That should tell you something...
I could make a Viagra ad out of this...

Eric,
I have AFCO's all around, Cal-Track springs and bars. I can go 10.00's w/ 1.38 60' on the rear tires w/ 9" x 29.5 M/T's. That's a stick car which typically have slower 60 foot times that comparable a/t cars.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2007, 12:39 AM   #10
Bob Gullett
VIP Member
 
Bob Gullett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 42
Liked 414 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: Slide a Links VS CalTracs.....

Thanks Jeff. The QA1's have 28 setting on each the compression and rebound. Setting them to 8 on the rebound seems fairly stiff. I set them to 15 and I couldn't pull them out. I set the compression fairly stiff. (10 setting) Suspension never has been my specialty. My Ranchos were fairly loose even on the stiffest setting on extension. They compressed fairly easy which could account for the squatting on launch.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S
Bob Gullett is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.