|
10-17-2008, 03:49 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Happy Valley, OR
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Tubes or Tubeless?
I suppose this will be as much of a disagreement amongst people as the timers thread!
Back when I was running S/G and brackets almost nobody ran tubeless, but now it seems that a majority of people are tubeless. I saw on a different thread (in the stock/SS forum) that running tubes was seen as dangerous as they felt a blowout would be catastrophic with a tube but only a slow leak if tubeless. Am I missing something? I crashed my car in the top end before (boomed a motor just before the traps), and one of the rear wheels was completely bent (where it landed on its side on the guardrail), but it was still holding air. It went up enough on the other side that the sidewall was all chafed, but it still did not loose any air. This was a tube chassis Vega with 16x32 Goodyears with natural rubber tubes and rim screws. A year ago I watched a friend in Top Dragster (running 13" slicks tubeless with rim screws), and she got sideways due to a cross wind, and bounced side-to-side until one tire blew (it broke the rim screws), at which point she did a barrell roll. What are the arguments pro and con? Obviously you remove rotating mass by eliminating tubes and screws, but I am more concerned with safety. Regards,
__________________
Michael Pliska 643 S/G |
10-17-2008, 04:05 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 364
Likes: 8
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Tubes or Tubeless?
We've always used tubes.Not necessarily from a safety standpoint,but the sidewalls last longer using tubes.
__________________
Nautilus Racing |
10-17-2008, 06:06 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
|
Re: Tubes or Tubeless?
I ran tubes in my S/ST car. It made my car more stable that is for sure
__________________
The Doughboy Lee Lones S/ST 323L |
10-18-2008, 07:35 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Disputanta Va (30 minutes from VMP)
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Tubes or Tubeless?
Ran tubes for years, now I don,t. Do not see a difference.
|
10-18-2008, 03:49 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wind Lake, WI
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Tubes or Tubeless?
Always ran Tubeless and never had a problem however I go through a set of tires about every 100 runs sidewalls go away! On a side note your friend with the top dragster was that like a old comp elimanator car with only 13" wide tires?
|
10-18-2008, 05:07 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Happy Valley, OR
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Tubes or Tubeless?
Not sure if it was originally a comp car, but it was a fairly lightweight, small-block powered mid-7 second car. She had mentioned that it ran a bit slower but obviously hooked better with a bigger set of tires. This was at a bracket finals, and the track prep was pretty decent.
__________________
Michael Pliska 643 S/G |
|
|