|
05-22-2013, 05:43 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: calgary alberta canada
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: weight reduction G/SA nova
a bit costly but a metric trans was worth 60 pounds from a turbo 350 for me
__________________
Dion Hildebrandt 6009 STK H/SA |
05-22-2013, 06:39 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 958
Likes: 618
Liked 165 Times in 60 Posts
|
Re: weight reduction G/SA nova
Strange. I have all my notes with weight removed, but cannot find the exact number on the brakes. There are a lot of things to get rid of, or modify, and you can get to where you want to be. Every ounce adds up.
I looked at the pictures of your car, are you having traction problems? Others familiar with your body style, and suspension can bring a lot more help. Sean
__________________
Sean Marconette 84 Mustang 5060 SS/N Last edited by Sean Marconette; 05-22-2013 at 06:47 PM. Reason: More info |
05-22-2013, 07:22 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Shefford,Qc Can
Posts: 289
Likes: 10
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: weight reduction G/SA nova
Sean no problem with traction those are old photos from 5 years ago just
Thanks for the infos Dion i have a metric in the car |
05-22-2013, 07:53 PM | #14 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 25
Liked 510 Times in 200 Posts
|
Re: weight reduction G/SA nova
Stock disc front brakes to Wilwoods on my 97 Firebird was worth 40 lbs....
and I weighed all the parts I took off and put on so that is accurate...
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 |
05-23-2013, 08:18 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 401
Likes: 271
Liked 458 Times in 108 Posts
|
Re: weight reduction G/SA nova
Matt, I agree with rich wilwood brakes were a 40 pound weight reduction in my car too!
Tim stickles |
05-23-2013, 08:54 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Shefford,Qc Can
Posts: 289
Likes: 10
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: weight reduction G/SA nova
Tim Rich, i have the wilwood brakes already
think ill put my dad behind the wheel he is 30lbs lighter than me lol |
05-23-2013, 09:45 AM | #17 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 1,078
Liked 180 Times in 110 Posts
|
Re: weight reduction G/SA nova
Quote:
Were they still an improvement in Braking over the stock Calipers? Considering them for my Impala SS. D Last edited by Dan Fahey; 05-23-2013 at 09:47 AM. |
|
05-23-2013, 09:53 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 401
Likes: 271
Liked 458 Times in 108 Posts
|
Re: weight reduction G/SA nova
|
05-23-2013, 10:06 AM | #19 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 25
Liked 510 Times in 200 Posts
|
Re: weight reduction G/SA nova
The brake kit I used was sold and put together by a compnay in Pa.
I can't recall their name or how I found them. It was basically a rear kit with mounts cutom made to fit the front of a late model f-body and worked very well. My car stopped better and still had aluminum drums in the rear at the time. I piled all the parts I took off the car on a bathroom scale and did the same thing with the new kit.......43 lbs lighter..... Those brakes are still on that car ....I sold it in 2006 or 2007
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 |
05-23-2013, 11:22 AM | #20 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,929
Liked 1,610 Times in 377 Posts
|
Re: weight reduction G/SA nova
Mat you need to get rid or unbolt anything you do not need or use,,Brackets brake cables wiring ..door hardware....liteweight parts where ever you can put them and dont forget time and $..I can get to 3125 in my car with abench seat..
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK |
|
|