|
05-25-2007, 09:01 PM | #21 |
VIP Member
|
Allen,you are right again. I`ve had the worst reaction times of my life with a delay box,but also the most consistant string of double ohs and teens with one. On the flip side,I`ve been fortunate enough to take out my V/SA Skyhawk after a long winter,with a new combination and be .011 on the second hit. There are racers out there that can hit the tree without the help of weird switches and whatever,and they are impressive. When they win a lot,everyone thinks they`re cheating. Lane
Lane M Weber 5701 Stock
__________________
Lane Weber It`s Not What You Drive That Wins....It`s How You Drive It |
05-25-2007, 11:35 PM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: right freakin here!
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
"Steve Taylor (RIP)"
Is this the same footbraking Steve Taylor who ran the caviliers? If it is, I didn't know he passed, what happened? |
05-26-2007, 12:58 PM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I use my RT to adjust myself, not a button, not my transmission, just me. By getting rid of RTs, it would take the driver out of the equation almost as much as a delay box. If you want a delay box there are 3 classes already waiting for you. If policing is the problem then get rid of transbrakes, and all wires going into the transmission. Even the "slow" transmissions aren't as effective as a delayed transbrake. Two steps still require two actions, release a button and release the brake; not to say I would be upset if they got rid of those too. As far as tire pressure and RPMs are concerned, that's car setup, and totally different.
|
|
|