HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-09-2014, 03:59 PM   #31
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,989
Likes: 690
Liked 1,453 Times in 541 Posts
Default Re: Choosing a Manifold:SBF

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireSail View Post
68 Cougar 302/230 stock heads
Intake: 1783
Exhaust: 1457
Head cc: 49.5
Rocker Ratio: 1.6

AFR 1399
Intake: 1900
Exhaust: 1600
Head cc: 58
Rocker Ratio: 1.6

Edelbrock 60217 heads (stamped NHRA Accepted)
Intake: 1900
Exhaust: 1600
Head cc: 60
Rocker Ratio: 1.6

If valves have to match stock +.005 like the rule book states, then neither of these heads listed as SS replacement heads in the Stock Car Classification Guide can be used without basically remanufacturing them down to factory specs. Why would NHRA approve heads that come either supplied or ready for valves that are too big?

Some posters on this forum make building for stock or super stock way too complicated. I refuse to be deterred.

Dale
You are correct and like I said before, there are no off-the-shelf bolt on parts for the class.

They approved the specific replacement heads because the rules allows you to replace the valve seats in both Stock and Super Stock classes. The rules are very clear that the cylinder heads must maintain stock head and stem size. The spec applies to the combustion chamber size too.

It's not complicated as long as you follow the rules and not subject to interpretation.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 11:42 AM   #32
Jim Caughlin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 635
Likes: 70
Liked 693 Times in 208 Posts
Default Re: Choosing a Manifold:SBF

Dale,

Don't give up and/or get discouraged. If it was me, I would put it together with the parts you have and start thrashing. It's usually a long and tedious battle to get the combination working so you have plenty to deal with for now. As you start getting within index range, bite the bullet and switch the components over to legal stuff. The 302 combination that you are looking at is as good as any Windsor out there so it's plenty viable. We don't have such a huge car count in SS that we don't want to discourage new cars being built. If you have questions about rules, Email to Dave Schaffel, he's a good guy and will help you clarify things.

Jim
Jim Caughlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.