HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-26-2009, 09:42 AM   #471
Greg Hill
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 63
Liked 270 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

One other thing is that who cares if a Firebird is a 97 or 98. It's basically the same car.

Greg
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK
Greg Hill is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 09:45 AM   #472
ss3845
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Hill View Post
The thing that really bothers me about this is that it's obvious that Ford did this with hp numbers they knew were bogus and that's like stealing. The other thing is that NHRA let them get away with it without protecting their own members from unfair competition. I was about ready to buy a new Ford Edge, I think now I will look at GM's.

Greg
Now that just doesn't make sense when you clearly admit GM did the exact same thing in your next post.

And what difference does it make if it is an "aftermarket built race car" as you claim. Didn't everyone who has an LS1/LT1 take them to the "aftermarket" and make them into a racecar? Who cares where the work is done? They built the required number as per the NHRA rules. And we all know there are countless cars out there with engines that were not available from the factory. This is not one of them. They were available in all 50 cars as per NHRA rules. When one actually gets down the track then you might have an argument on the HP factor, but nobody that can do anything about it will be listening. You should know that better than anyone.

Jim McBean
ss3845 is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 09:47 AM   #473
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

First the new Mustang idea is good for the sport if used wisely by NHRA.
Arent they part of the plan for a racing Camaro project(cancelled by economy) and the challenger by Chrysler to compete again in one class?
Why wouldnt NHRA put them by themselves? no chevies being built to race, no Chryslers yet? They are ready to run and need tested against something? See how it changes with Challengers arriving.
Body in White Camaro may be produced and used yet.
Dick Butler is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 09:56 AM   #474
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Beach View Post
Greg,
So who was stealing when they set the LT1 (305 factory) to 275hp and the LS1 (310 non ram or 325 ram air factory) to 305? NHRA or GM?
Check, the LT1 was NEVER 305 HP in anything. it was 300 in the vette but had a different cam and better breathing. It was 275 93-95 and 285 96-97. The LS1 cars WERE factory rated at 305 hp. get your facts straight before you start accusing stuff. I don't have one of those cars and I will agree that 305 was a very soft rating for the LS cars, however that IS what gm advertised to the public

Link to LT1 engine specs
http://www.lt1engine.com/tech/lt1-en...n-power-specs/
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA

Last edited by Chad Rhodes; 01-26-2009 at 10:00 AM.
Chad Rhodes is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 10:02 AM   #475
Greg Hill
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 63
Liked 270 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

Jim I don't think that rating the LT1's at 275 hp was right either, or the LS1's at 305. Just because that happened shouldn't be justification for this bogus hp rating on the mustang.

Greg
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK
Greg Hill is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 10:07 AM   #476
countrypuppy4865
Senior Member
 
countrypuppy4865's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Donaldsonville, LA
Posts: 966
Likes: 8
Liked 183 Times in 62 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

Greg Hill:
"One other thing is that who cares if a Firebird is a 97 or 98. It's basically the same car."

Evan,
You are quick to complain about NHRA allowing a new front end on the LT-1 Firebirds and Camaro. I think we have other issues that are more problematic than this. Explain to me how this is a performance advantage. As for the new Mustangs I think they look great, and I have nothing against them; they are in the books so they get to play despite what anybody says about them.




Jimmy Hidalgo, Jr.
countrypuppy4865 is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 10:13 AM   #477
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

Guys,
Pro or Con Factory Experimental, Number 500 will be the last post for this thread; providing it is on topic and does not taunt. It was one hell of a ride. We have had a very spirited debate and everyone has had an opportunity to express their views.

Thank you to everyone who participated in this debate and especially to Kenny for providing a place for all of us to air our opinions.

Good luck in 2009
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK

Last edited by Bruce Noland; 01-26-2009 at 10:16 AM.
Bruce Noland is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 10:55 AM   #478
Chuck Beach
Senior Member
 
Chuck Beach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Delaware, Ohio
Posts: 664
Likes: 12
Liked 59 Times in 13 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chuck Beach
Red face Re: Factory experimental

Chad,
Not accusing anything, you just back-up my observation that we were 'officially cheated' by NHRA for underrating the LT1 and LS1. But that was Ok since Pontiac was the 'official' sponsor and they threw those cars in with us. Now that 'maybe' Mopar and Chebbie has backed out of the American Muscle class because of the financial situation, Ford has not. And this is what Ford has advertised to the public for these cars. So apparently NHRA decided to throw them in with the rest of the classes. They probably did that so they wouldn't have to add a new class for one car and it would be better racing if they ran other cars instead of just each other. You disapprove because it affects you ... sorry about your luck ..
__________________
Chuck Beach
3340 STK

Last edited by Chuck Beach; 01-26-2009 at 10:58 AM.
Chuck Beach is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 10:59 AM   #479
Floyd Staggs
VIP Member
 
Floyd Staggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 132
Liked 220 Times in 95 Posts
Default Re: Factory experimental

Okay, let's close it down and wait a week and a half and see what happens at the track.
__________________
Floyd Staggs 787 SST
Floyd Staggs is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.