HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Bracket Racing
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2011, 03:12 PM   #1
trikbag406
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Newport,Delaware
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Question Question for TH-400 builders:

I have a th400 with reverse manual trans-brake valve body in my Vega.I already know I built the clutch stacks too tight (10-20 thousandths per stack),because when you wing it to 4-5000 in neutral,the car lurches forward,kinda like the forward clutch is too tight.My question,if you haven't guessed,is what would be a good baseline clutch stack clearance for each set in the trans? I'm simply gonna dis-assemble the trans,check the clearance,and machine the clutch pistons,if possible.Thanks in advance ladies and gents-Lew.
__________________
Tranquility base,the Vega has landed...
trikbag406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 04:28 PM   #2
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 2,579
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
Default Re: Question for TH-400 builders:

.010 per friction unless you are into some weird situation with a T-brake.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 04:32 PM   #3
Tom Goldman
VIP Member
 
Tom Goldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 774
Liked 699 Times in 203 Posts
Default Re: Question for TH-400 builders:

Most TH 400 trans brake applications require .060-.080" clearance.
even with that clearance there is still considerable drag in the pack.
Most builders use o-ring segments slightly thicker than the disc to stand off the steel plates from the discs to reduce drag.
4 to 6 segments per disc,cut so they just fit into the steel plate slot in the drum.
the disc and centrifugal force will keep them in place.
most 400 brakes also require an .030-045" bleed hole in the drum and heavier piston return springs.

The drag will be even worse if you are using metallic waffel type discs.
__________________
Tom Goldman 1500 SG , 1506 STK
Tom Goldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 11:46 PM   #4
trikbag406
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Newport,Delaware
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Question for TH-400 builders:

Thanks guys,appreciate the info.Tom I've heard of the o-ring trick before,just have never seen it myself.It makes good sense,and I'm game,it doesn't take a magic wand to make it happen,and yes,I'm using waffle clutches,so I really ought to start cutting up some o-rings
__________________
Tranquility base,the Vega has landed...
trikbag406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 11:49 PM   #5
trikbag406
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Newport,Delaware
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Question for TH-400 builders:

Oh,and I almost forgot,the drum has already been drilled,and yes there are some un-Godly return springs in this thing,my home-made snap-press didn't even want to compress it enough to get the snap-ring out.
__________________
Tranquility base,the Vega has landed...
trikbag406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2011, 04:09 AM   #6
Alan Roehrich
VIP Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,907
Likes: 993
Liked 1,031 Times in 270 Posts
Default Re: Question for TH-400 builders:

The o-ring most use is a servo o-ring from a 700R4 or 4L60E. But the problem with the release on all but one of the 400 brakes is not in the drum or the clutch pack, the problem lies in the passages that they use.

At 0.010" per clutch, you'll have only 0.050" to 0.060" clearance in the direct drum. Now 0.020" per clutch is too loose, at least it is for me. I actually use a 6 clutch pack with about 0.080" clearance. It seems that most often when you exceed 0.080", you end up with a 2-3 shift flair, and the car rocks forward a little when the brake is applied. Now, 0.050" to 0.060" is fine for the forward input drum.

If you go the cheap route, and use standard steels, note there are 2-3 different thickness steels. You can adjust your clearance that way. Also note that some drums cannot be used with shorter pistons, as the steel that sits on the piston can drop too low and rotate, then it will not apply.

I've had a lot better success, and longevity, from the Alto Red Eagle clutches and Kolene steels. My 350, 400 and PowerGlide transmissions go forever between overhauls, with no problems, and even after a couple of seasons or more, they look like new. I use the Alto stuff in every clutch pack.

How you set one up depends on what brake is in it. ATI makes a good budget 400 brake, and the TCI isn't bad. We had trouble out of all of the others. With one exception. The absolute best brake for a 400 is the Griner, even ATI will tell you the Griner is better than theirs.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2011, 08:20 AM   #7
Tom Goldman
VIP Member
 
Tom Goldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 774
Liked 699 Times in 203 Posts
Default Re: Question for TH-400 builders:

X2 on the Griner 400 brake,it's absolutly the best.
Same for the rest of his valve bodies,never had any issues .
__________________
Tom Goldman 1500 SG , 1506 STK
Tom Goldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.