|
11-11-2021, 01:06 PM | #21 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,331
Likes: 859
Liked 6,625 Times in 1,291 Posts
|
Re: TorqueHead vs Opti
Guys, I hate to pile on ..BUT for AWESOME DAN I will make an exception. Dan, use the crank trigger that EVERYONE else is using
.REGARDS,
|
Liked |
11-11-2021, 01:24 PM | #22 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 1,078
Liked 180 Times in 110 Posts
|
Re: TorqueHead vs Opti
Quote:
Reason for asking lots of questions. If what you say is true. Pat will figure it out. This is not a popularity contest. It is FACT Finding. Careless if it hurts your feelings. As for simple google search, there is no such thing. Searched everywhere for relevant solutions for my car. There is a lot of information and limited time. Did not even know until Billy mentioned about the Holly PCU. That looks good, is there another that works? How does it work with the existing PCM? Companies advertise to sell their top systems. The plethora of information is tough to sort out. I have not done this before. Just wanted to know what and how it works and what is legal. D |
|
11-11-2021, 02:00 PM | #23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: TorqueHead vs Opti
The crank and cam sensors are the optispark, that's why it's called an optispark. It's an optical sensor that picks up a light source that's blocked by a timing wheel with slots to show where on the rotation TDC and every other cylinder is and the rpm increase.
I dont need to talk to anybody because I can clearly read the rules. The motor has a crank sensor and needs one to function. |
11-11-2021, 02:22 PM | #24 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 1,709
Liked 1,732 Times in 418 Posts
|
Re: TorqueHead vs Opti
Quote:
My first post in this thread was an attempt to point you in the right direction. You have not hurt my feelings. You have wasted a bunch of my time responding to phone calls about this. From here on out you are on your own. See you on the bottom of the qualifying sheets, Daren Last edited by GUMP; 11-11-2021 at 02:33 PM. |
|
Liked |
11-11-2021, 03:05 PM | #25 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 2,582
Liked 4,453 Times in 1,694 Posts
|
Re: TorqueHead vs Opti
Entertainment: Priceless
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers |
Liked |
11-11-2021, 06:16 PM | #26 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 3,103
Liked 6,791 Times in 1,524 Posts
|
Re: TorqueHead vs Opti
Then why do you ask the questions and then not listen to the answers? It's the 21st century! An LT-1 is easier to build than a 283 or a 305!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS World's greatest Under-Achiever! |
Liked |
11-11-2021, 11:10 PM | #27 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 1,078
Liked 180 Times in 110 Posts
|
Re: TorqueHead vs Opti
Quote:
Building an LT is not a problem, the accessories are. It is confusing if you have not done it before. Drag Racing is not my life. I have no disagreement with any of you and rely on your responses. You are not my enemy! Pat Cvengros says what the rules are not you. I sent you the email responses. You have his email. Not one of you has reached out to him to help clarify them. What you say means nothing as he a Tech Director and owns the rules. I have 15 years as a Soccer Ref, decades on the Pitch as a player, Coach, Team and League owner. Worked many critical games running up against Rules. I go through daily physical training, monthly seminars, annual testing, learning rules changes every year. NHRA is no different and respect their governance. I sent you his responses and you beat on me…! Your complaints do not phase me ! So F off! I gave you the information. Based on the feedback it is now a gray area. Help get a clear answer from Pat. This is beyond my understanding and may/will impact you! The exchange was posted. Fair warning! Help or you may not like his upcoming decision at Pomona.! D Last edited by Dan Fahey; 11-12-2021 at 01:01 AM. |
|
11-12-2021, 07:17 AM | #28 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: TorqueHead vs Opti
Quote:
Dude you made this mess were not cleaning it up, I'm not your mother. |
|
Liked |
11-12-2021, 01:04 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
Posts: 898
Likes: 604
Liked 432 Times in 225 Posts
|
Re: TorqueHead vs Opti
I've never raced in Stock, but I guess I'm a potential future Stock racer like anyone else.
This has been a pretty enlightening thread. I'm well aware of Dan's history here on CR, but I'm having a hard time understanding how Dan is being vilified for reaching out to those in charge to get a clarification on a legitimate question in an effort to comply, before learning a hard lesson at the track. I could easily see myself falling into the same situation.
__________________
S/ST 51 S/C 53 |
Liked |
11-12-2021, 01:21 PM | #30 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 3,103
Liked 6,791 Times in 1,524 Posts
|
Re: TorqueHead vs Opti
Quote:
Are you familiar with the 1992-1997-8 LT-1? It has no distributor! It has no place to put a distributor! It is unlike any other conventional small-block Chevy. The spark and fuel are controlled by a "crank" position and a cam position sensor through the ECM.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS World's greatest Under-Achiever! |
|
Liked |
|
|