1.28 - 60 ft - Page 5

1320racer · 03-01-2012, 12:41 AM

you continue to make statements about cars and performance you are CLUELESS about!

Stick to what you know, lying to the naive and misinformed, not what you think you know.

HP HUNTER · 03-01-2012, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1320racer

you continue to make statements about cars and performance you are CLUELESS about!

Stick to what you know, lying to the naive and misinformed, not what you think you know.

What I know Ed is this: How to put over a 1/2 second with my oval port iron headed, production blocked 10.8 compression engine on the first full pass down the track on your red chevelle, 10.07 to 9.56. What I know Ed is this: How to win two srait Hot street championships (10 inch tire all motor 3350 pounds) and hold both ends of the record as an engine builder/machinist. Now didnt you finish second in points in the local bracket race series?

1320racer · 03-01-2012, 01:01 AM

Nobody cares about your lies and claims, least of which is me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HP HUNTER

Come on Ed, shouldnt a 4 link SS/GT car run in the teens under a no rules 522 inch aftermarket engine? Frank Grossi 8.77 peanut port 454, flattop Q-jet, 1.19 60 foot, thats just what these cars do. Just saying.......

My car isn't a SS/GT car, it's a footbrake launched bracket car who's engine is no comparison in design, intent and cost to a super stock engine but if you insist, my car is quicker than every national record holding super stock car EXCEPT the following... SS/AH (a hemi car), SS/AS, SS/BS, SS/AM, SS/BM, SS/CM(modified cars).

http://www.nhra.net/stats/ss_record.html

Not too shabby from where I sit and it cost a fraction of what these cars cost to build and makes many more passes and turns on more win lights each season.

HP HUNTER · 03-01-2012, 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1320racer

Nobody cares about your lies and claims, least of which is me.

My car isn't a SS/GT car, it's a footbrake launched bracket car who's engine is no comparison in design, intent and cost to a super stock engine but if you insist, my car is quicker than every national record holding super stock car EXCEPT the following... SS/AH (a hemi car), SS/AS, SS/BS, SS/AM, SS/BM, SS/CM(modified cars).

http://www.nhra.net/stats/ss_record.html

Not too shabby from where I sit and it cost a fraction of what these cars cost to build and makes many more passes and turns on more win lights each season.

You put a tenth on Grossi's peanut port (236), Q jet, flattop pistoned, 454 with your 522 inch big block, in negative 2000 feet air, 30.4 baro, nice work, we got a car like yours but its on a 10 inch tire, and of course its a little heavier, but its quite a bit faster, infact it turned the win light on in every race over a two year span except one, of course heads up racing isnt as competitive as bracket racing. LOL

Ed Wright · 03-01-2012, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1320racer

actually this should be in bracket racing.

x2! Lol

HP HUNTER · 03-01-2012, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

x2! Lol

Ya Ed, your the terror in J when they call for class eliminations. LOL

Mike Casteel · 03-01-2012, 12:34 PM

[QUOTE=1320racer;312312]Nobody cares about your lies and claims, least of which is me.

My car isn't a SS/GT car, it's a footbrake launched bracket car who's engine is no comparison in design, intent and cost to a super stock engine but if you insist, my car is quicker than every national record holding super stock car EXCEPT the following... SS/AH (a hemi car), SS/AS, SS/BS, SS/AM, SS/BM, SS/CM(modified cars).

http://www.nhra.net/stats/ss_record.html

Not quicker than John Armstrongs SS/AA, he's been at least 8.7 if not 8.6.

Ed Wright · 03-01-2012, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HP HUNTER

Ya Ed, your the terror in J when they call for class eliminations. LOL

I'm not the beating my chest about how blinding fast I am, nor how nobody believes how hast I am. You just are clueless about how different combinations MPH versus ET.

You & 1320 can stop all the PMs. I don't care how smart or fast you guys think you are.

James L Miller · 03-01-2012, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Grubbs

My sisters better looking than yours.

Send me a picture of your sister. I might be interested.

It looks like your thread has worked it's magic.

1320racer · 03-01-2012, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Casteel

[Not quicker than John Armstrongs SS/AA, he's been at least 8.7 if not 8.6.

FYI, I've run 8.70 in good air, not great air and I've run 5.50 in the 1/8th with a restrictor plate having 1 3/8" holes.

03-01-2012, 12:41 AM	#41
1320racer VIP Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: New Jersey Posts: 1,778 Likes: 70 Liked 400 Times in 191 Posts	Re: 1.28 - 60 ft you continue to make statements about cars and performance you are CLUELESS about! Stick to what you know, lying to the naive and misinformed, not what you think you know.

03-01-2012, 12:34 PM	#47
Mike Casteel Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 15 Likes: 0 Liked 1 Time in 1 Post	Re: 1.28 - 60 ft [QUOTE=1320racer;312312]Nobody cares about your lies and claims, least of which is me. My car isn't a SS/GT car, it's a footbrake launched bracket car who's engine is no comparison in design, intent and cost to a super stock engine but if you insist, my car is quicker than every national record holding super stock car EXCEPT the following... SS/AH (a hemi car), SS/AS, SS/BS, SS/AM, SS/BM, SS/CM(modified cars). http://www.nhra.net/stats/ss_record.html Not quicker than John Armstrongs SS/AA, he's been at least 8.7 if not 8.6.