HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2019, 07:08 PM   #1
Jim Hanig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pukwana SD
Posts: 858
Likes: 555
Liked 97 Times in 47 Posts
Default bellhoushing

How many stick shift guys check there bellhousing alignment, how far off can it be.
Jim Hanig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 07:38 PM   #2
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 242
Liked 919 Times in 252 Posts
Default Re: bellhoushing

Always check them, never had one that was dead on, or close to it, out of the box. A bit of a pain, but always a good idea to check and correct. When I get the bellhousing dialed in with offset dowel pins, I always drill and tap the block for small set screws so that the pins won`t get knocked out of position during bellhousing re & re . Obviously zero is ideal, but I try to keep it under .005".
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 03-12-2019, 09:41 PM   #3
Stephen & Horace Johnson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 956
Likes: 323
Liked 147 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: bellhoushing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Hanig View Post
How many stick shift guys check there bellhousing alignment, how far off can it be.
I have 2 QT's on my cars both were dead on
__________________
Stephen Johnson #2162
Horace Johnson #2167
SS/D 427 Ford Fairlane NHRA-IHRA
Stephen & Horace Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 10:08 PM   #4
Nmbr1GMfan
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,767
Likes: 1,199
Liked 1,957 Times in 492 Posts
Default Re: bellhoushing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen & Horace Johnson View Post
I have 2 QT's on my cars both were dead on
I have found QT's to be really good as well.
__________________
Todd Greene
Nmbr1GMfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 10:10 PM   #5
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 242
Liked 919 Times in 252 Posts
Default Re: bellhoushing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen & Horace Johnson View Post
I have 2 QT's on my cars both were dead on
Stephen, do you have a QuickTime in the Fairlane? If so, with what clutch? I had heard that on a FE Ford the QuickTimes were not deep enough to work with a Long style pressure plate with a 10 or 10 1/2" disc, unless you stacked up block plates to get enough room. What is your experiance with the FE?
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 11:43 PM   #6
T Ames
Member
 
T Ames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: the Brazos Valley of TX
Posts: 103
Likes: 118
Liked 73 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: bellhoushing

Hello Jim. Agree with Rory on being within ~.005. I like the Browell alignment tool and also the RobbMC offset dowels.
T Ames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 10:32 AM   #7
Run to Rund
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 574
Likes: 6
Liked 44 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: bellhoushing

I have had to use offset dowels and also correct in and out being off square. I use Lakewood dowels drilled and tapped 5/16 x 18 so I can remove them with a slide hammer. I have gotten some pretty bad alignments to within .001" by carefully orienting the dowels. Yes, I also have found QT to be much better than the old Lakewoods, but still the block is often not close enough.
Run to Rund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 02:23 PM   #8
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 164
Liked 644 Times in 205 Posts
Cool Re: bellhoushing

A machinist I knew, one of those guys who must stay up nights thinking about new ideas and stuff, took a very accurately machined,decked, squared, line honed and ready to go block, and just for something else to do, decided to check and see if the rear mating surface of the block was accurate, in this, he meant 90 degrees perpendicular to the center line of the main saddles. He put a ready to go crank in it, then a flywheel which he properly torqued, and checked for run out,it was perfect, but when he checked the distance from the rear face of the flywheel to the surface of the block, it wasn't 90 degrees from the crankshaft c/l. In other words, the bell housing flange wasn't the least bit flat, or accurately machined.Now,dealing with a cast iron block that came from the furnace and was originally machined at the OEM engine plant long before it ever was a seasoned casting, that makes sense. I remember cars when I worked in dealers in the mid-late '70s once in a while you would get one with a cracked flex plate. If it's absorbing run out every revolution,how long can you expect it to last? You 4 speed racers, and I love seeing them, trying to get an accurate result using offset dowel pins and God knows what else it might take to achieve an accurate result from a hydroformed or stamped part like that scatter shield,could have a whole host of inaccuracies to deal with. In short, has anybody ever had clutch and flywheel issues due to inaccurate machining of the rear face of the block on back? I'll bet we have,and don't know it!!
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 03:27 PM   #9
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 52
Liked 704 Times in 176 Posts
Default Re: bellhoushing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Reimer 7376 View Post
. . . In other words, the bell housing flange wasn't the least bit flat, or accurately machined.. . .
X2!
__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 03:27 PM   #10
Jim Caughlin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 634
Likes: 70
Liked 691 Times in 207 Posts
Default Re: bellhoushing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Reimer 7376 View Post
A machinist I knew, one of those guys who must stay up nights thinking about new ideas and stuff, took a very accurately machined,decked, squared, line honed and ready to go block, and just for something else to do, decided to check and see if the rear mating surface of the block was accurate, in this, he meant 90 degrees perpendicular to the center line of the main saddles. He put a ready to go crank in it, then a flywheel which he properly torqued, and checked for run out,it was perfect, but when he checked the distance from the rear face of the flywheel to the surface of the block, it wasn't 90 degrees from the crankshaft c/l. In other words, the bell housing flange wasn't the least bit flat, or accurately machined.Now,dealing with a cast iron block that came from the furnace and was originally machined at the OEM engine plant long before it ever was a seasoned casting, that makes sense. I remember cars when I worked in dealers in the mid-late '70s once in a while you would get one with a cracked flex plate. If it's absorbing run out every revolution,how long can you expect it to last? You 4 speed racers, and I love seeing them, trying to get an accurate result using offset dowel pins and God knows what else it might take to achieve an accurate result from a hydroformed or stamped part like that scatter shield,could have a whole host of inaccuracies to deal with. In short, has anybody ever had clutch and flywheel issues due to inaccurate machining of the rear face of the block on back? I'll bet we have,and don't know it!!
Totally correct, you have to check for parallel before you start checking for run out, I've seen this problem also.

On another note regarding Quicktime, thank you very much for changing the flange bolt pattern and not saying anything. I use a small block Ford bellhousing from Quicktime which bolts to an adapter plate (that I fabricated) to fit my 2.3 Ford motor. I bought a new 'duplicate' bellhousing from them last year and the entire flange arrangement had been changed. I had to rework my adapter plate along with the chassis cross member to make everything fit. As a general rule, I like the Quicktime quality but sure wasn't happy about the unnecessary redesign. Also, their prices went through the roof when they got bought out a few years back.
Jim Caughlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.