|
03-11-2018, 11:41 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: PORT ORANGE FL
Posts: 273
Likes: 373
Liked 112 Times in 20 Posts
|
Re: Pro-trans VS McClay metric
To add a question into this mix, I have a customer with a McClay 200 he likes to stage at a low rpm, when he hits to trans brake button the car will roll forward. If you bring the RPMs up to 2000 while rolling in to stage it is ok. anybody else fighting this.
__________________
Denny Steward GT/JA 246 |
03-11-2018, 01:17 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greencastle pa
Posts: 198
Likes: 52
Liked 286 Times in 55 Posts
|
Re: Pro-trans VS McClay metric
I switched to PRO TRANS and was very satisfied so I bought a second one. Sepanek maintains them, you will never find a more reasonable and trusting guy than Jack. Give him a call, he services and builds all types of transmissions and he would be the best one to give you advise on your question. 570-457-6517
__________________
Herbie Null 201 SS |
Liked |
03-11-2018, 02:39 PM | #13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 2,222
Liked 1,808 Times in 572 Posts
|
Re: Pro-trans VS McClay metric
We run 727 and 904 in our stock or SS stuff/ Glide in No Prep.
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
03-11-2018, 04:55 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: east hartford ct.
Posts: 539
Likes: 1
Liked 9 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: Pro-trans VS McClay metric
Quote:
__________________
Mark Markow 171 ss/tb |
|
03-11-2018, 05:35 PM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
|
Re: Pro-trans VS McClay metric
I had a T350 with a low volume front pump that did that. Had to hold the foot brake, rev it to 2500 to set the trans brake. My Pro Trans does none of that. Sits right where I push the trans brake button. That works better, it's quicker, I can not think of a thing I would change. Maybe the price. LOL. Just kidding. Well worth the price as well.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
03-11-2018, 09:10 PM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 2,581
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
|
Re: Pro-trans VS McClay metric
Again, all good people mentioned here so far.
Not mentioned is Leo G. (Remac) Leo has the cojones to run a 200 behind a 428 Pontiac Super Stocker. Believe me,..that's an endurance test.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers |
03-12-2018, 05:01 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 504
Likes: 7
Liked 352 Times in 82 Posts
|
Re: Pro-trans VS McClay metric
I experienced the "jump" you're talking about with McClay 200s. Called Scott and he confirmed that his trans brake must "fill" before it will hold absolutely tight. Not the greatest feature in the world, but once you get used to clicking the transbrake button right when you light the second yellow and immediately bringing the RPM up to around 2500, you won't experience the condition again. Having said that, I have never heard anyone that said a 200 and a ProTrans are equal in ET (users always say the ProTrans is quicker).
|
03-12-2018, 09:50 PM | #18 | |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 112
Liked 2,866 Times in 640 Posts
|
Re: Pro-trans VS McClay metric
Quote:
__________________
James Williamson W200 J/SA |
|
|
|