HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2013, 12:50 PM   #21
Gary Smith
Senior Member
 
Gary Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 807
Likes: 7
Liked 75 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Hemi Head Ruling

Even though I'm nowhere near the class of an AH racer, the same problem affected me as well as all other NHRA racers, and that's the persuasive power money has towards the sanctioning body, starting from the top down. Just like governmental politics it appeared the creation of the AH class, and the convoluted rules would make Mopar the ultimate benefactor in selling parts to ALL the engine builders. Nothing against Charlie or Ray, but I saw the writing on the wall several years ago when Mopar stepped up to support the class, knowing full well how their dollars would influence NHRA rules, while the spirit and legacy of these cars eventually started to fade. After many years around various forms of motorsports, I can't help but notice how honest "non-profit" sanctioning bodies waiver very little in terms of guidelines through unbiased governance, a trait NHRA lost decades ago.

I may be wrong, but it's just my $.02
__________________
Gary Smith
"another broke racer spectating"
Gary Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 02-26-2013, 01:04 PM   #22
Bucky Hess
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bunker Hill
Posts: 181
Likes: 67
Liked 153 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: Hemi Head Ruling

Man, you all are gonna ruin the class before i get back out......Except,Except. why should we be excepted from ss.
__________________
Bucky Hess 1426 SS/AH
Bucky Hess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 02:02 PM   #23
herbjr
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 1
Liked 83 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Hemi Head Ruling

My popcorn just finished, cold drink in hand, cant wait to see where this goes!
herbjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 02:50 PM   #24
David Barton
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Hemi Head Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Castros View Post
The simple solution would have been to move forward, and state the rule will be enforced as originally written to benefit the class and no one competitor or engine builder.
The integrity of the Super Stock Class is being questioned by this decision.
I couldn't agree more. The rules were fine the way they were. But like other past experiences we've had, they make a rule change to accommodate guys like CW. I don't know where all the love is coming from, but he has something on them. Or maybe in them.

Here is a perfect example. If you ask NHRA if you can run a raised cam in Super Stock they will tell you no. There are several SS/AH guys that have raised cams. My Dad asked if we can protest anyone with a raised cam and NHRA told him, "Well, that's not something we really check." Why not?

So now NHRA is considering grandfathering the raised cam rule because apparently some guys have been running them for quite some time now. Yeah, that seems fair. Instead of enforcing the rule, lets change it for the cheaters.

Same thing happened at Indy a few years back. We got word that CW's guys were running funky lifter angles. We asked Bruce from NHRA at the Keystone's if he would check anyone if they were protested. He said, "I would, but I don't have the equipment". So we asked if we supplied him with the right tools if he would check anyone and he assured us it wouldn't be a problem.

Guess what, we get to Indy, and Danny Gracia and Bruce denied the protest. The one time we actually said "F*** it, enough is enough, lets protest this bastard", we were turned down. The following week we received a phone call from NHRA along with an e-mail confirming we had a personal invitation to relocate our lifter bores anywhere we want in both Stock and Super Stock. It was never published in the rule book, but I have a copy.

We never asked for any favoritism. Just enforce the stinking rules!
David Barton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 03:35 PM   #25
jaythorne
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 4
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Hemi Head Ruling

David didnt u move lifter bores around before charlie ever saw a hemi?
jaythorne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 03:47 PM   #26
David Barton
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Hemi Head Ruling

Yes, we were moving the lifter bores. But then we were told that was illegal so it was stopped. We didn't ask for a rule change.

Years later we caught wind others were doing it. When we asked NHRA about it they agreed it was illegal. When we attempted to protest we were denied.
David Barton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 06:18 PM   #27
Larry Fulton
Member
 
Larry Fulton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 270
Likes: 49
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Hemi Head Ruling

You can call it Innovation, or Interpretation, but it's really the Lack of Consistent Rules Enforcement from the NHRA Tech. Department that ruined Stock and Super Stock long ago. This Hemi Head debacle is just another example of letting too much go on, for too long.

So my question is this... Since, both stock & super stock, are now modified so far beyond the original intent of their class/es, why should any of this really matter?
__________________
Larry Fulton

Last edited by Larry Fulton; 02-26-2013 at 06:22 PM.
Larry Fulton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 06:50 PM   #28
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
Default Re: Hemi Head Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Fulton View Post
You can call it Innovation, or Interpretation, but it's really the Lack of Consistent Rules Enforcement from the NHRA Tech. Department that ruined Stock and Super Stock long ago. This Hemi Head debacle is just another example of letting too much go on, for too long.

So my question is this... Since, both stock & super stock, are now modified so far beyond the original intent of their class/es, why should any of this really matter?
X2!
It reminds years ago of the combustion chamber size shrouding issue with the Chevy small blocks.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 09:47 PM   #29
Tom Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 900
Likes: 51
Liked 301 Times in 105 Posts
Default Re: Hemi Head Ruling

Who remembers when they let ported heads in super stock it was kind of funny when alot of guys that were going fast at the time did not go any faster with the new rule. Now look where we are at. Tom
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ???
Tom Meyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 11:21 PM   #30
Jim Bailey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 699
Likes: 17
Liked 570 Times in 107 Posts
Cool Re: Hemi Head Ruling

David, it's time to call in the Amish Mafia !!!
Jim Bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.