|
04-27-2009, 04:57 AM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: First New Challenger/ Indy
I fully agree with Jeff, Doug is a great guy and a very good racer. He didn't just open his wallet and buy a competetive car. He built this car from scratch. Congrats on a very succesful debut.
|
04-27-2009, 08:02 AM | #32 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: First New Challenger/ Indy
Quote:
Actual ET was 10.922 Difference = .180 Does that mean my car is really good or really bad?
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
|
04-27-2009, 02:20 PM | #33 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: First New Challenger/ Indy
If you can beat the formula, it shows you have done very well with making your car as competitive as possible. And that's assuming WOT to the finish line. You know as well as I you can drop MPH while still sustaining the ET.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
04-27-2009, 02:37 PM | #34 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 5
Liked 262 Times in 100 Posts
|
Re: First New Challenger/ Indy
Quote:
I ran somebody with the same combination as I do this weekend on a time trial. I ran 11.24 at 116,the other car ran 11.03 at 120. I think I beat the formula,but he beat me to the finish line by over two tenths. |
|
04-27-2009, 03:32 PM | #35 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: First New Challenger/ Indy
Quote:
The way i see it the car most still be accelerating past the finishline in good manner for this formula to work.. |
|
04-27-2009, 05:25 PM | #36 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: eastriver
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: First New Challenger/ Indy
Did any one get a photo of this new Challenger in action?
Sure would like to see it... |
|
|