New HP UP - Page 3

Ed Wright · 07-11-2012, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Colvert

New HP up on NHRA comp site.

You dodged this round Jeff! LOL

Sam Capizzi Jr · 07-11-2012, 09:03 PM

I have a question?? Why wouldnt they change all the 318 2bbl motors 68-73 that use the same carb, valve size cam etc.... The 69 motor also has more compression then the later years.

Jeff Teuton · 07-11-2012, 09:50 PM

John, the 7 hp is correct. The average was about .880 under and there was a 1.13 under run. That equals 2.25%. And as far as Wann with the six pack, he did run some good numbers. I ran 10.60s a couple of times. Trouble is at the same race the 396's ran 10.30 in the same class. Every time. I mean we are all Democrats here, so everything must be equal and alike.

Tom Moock · 07-11-2012, 11:23 PM

Jeff, there needs to be 2 runs of 1 seconds under to get looked at, Wade all runs were they have [class run offs] count on the average also, not just your fastest run in Qualifing, runs at open`s don`t count on average`s, only runs of 1.20 under get you hp.. Tom

Wade_Owens · 07-11-2012, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Moock

Wade all runs were they have [class run offs] count on the average also, not just your fastest run in Qualifing, runs at open`s don`t count on average`s, only runs of 1.20 under get you hp.. Tom

Tommy, you are correct sir on the class run offs.

I know what the rules say about the Open data, but it has been used for adjustments. Same as some .2xx under runs have ended up in the data and resulted in a hp reduction. The best way to approach it is as if all data will be used

Wade

Frank Bialas · 07-12-2012, 12:53 AM

[QUOTE=Randy Loge;334942 Now if we could just get them to give back some "luv" to the 70 GTX 440 6 Pak!!! 417 hp is REDICULOUS!!!!!![/QUOTE]

Looks like they are loving the 1970 ROADRUNNER, but it should apply to the 1970 GTX also even though shipping weights are different and the 1970 ROADRUNNER was previously classified as a natural A car.

Dwight Southerland · 07-12-2012, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Capizzi Jr

I have a question?? Why wouldnt they change all the 318 2bbl motors 68-73 that use the same carb, valve size cam etc.... The 69 motor also has more compression then the later years.

I agree. No sense. It's the "Billy Lynn Rule" thinking.

Doug McCue · 07-12-2012, 01:40 PM

there is more added

Paul Wong · 07-12-2012, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank Bialas

Looks like they are loving the 1970 ROADRUNNER, but it should apply to the 1970 GTX also even though shipping weights are different and the 1970 ROADRUNNER was previously classified as a natural A car.

The 1970 GTX got the 6 hp back and is now at 411. Needs to be 405 hp

Doug McCue · 07-12-2012, 09:03 PM

Where is the run data used for these purposes located? And can anyone view the numbers?

07-11-2012, 09:03 PM	#22
Sam Capizzi Jr Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Rochester NY Posts: 125 Likes: 21 Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts	Re: New HP UP I have a question?? Why wouldnt they change all the 318 2bbl motors 68-73 that use the same carb, valve size cam etc.... The 69 motor also has more compression then the later years. __________________ Sam Capizzi Jr. 1301 SS/AS 93 Dodge Daytona R/SA 73 Dodge Dart

07-11-2012, 09:50 PM	#23
Jeff Teuton VIP Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houma, LA Posts: 2,717 Likes: 2 Liked 326 Times in 50 Posts	Re: New HP UP John, the 7 hp is correct. The average was about .880 under and there was a 1.13 under run. That equals 2.25%. And as far as Wann with the six pack, he did run some good numbers. I ran 10.60s a couple of times. Trouble is at the same race the 396's ran 10.30 in the same class. Every time. I mean we are all Democrats here, so everything must be equal and alike. __________________ Jeff Teuton 4022 STK

07-11-2012, 11:23 PM	#24
Tom Moock Senior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 801 Likes: 1 Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts	Re: New HP UP Jeff, there needs to be 2 runs of 1 seconds under to get looked at, Wade all runs were they have [class run offs] count on the average also, not just your fastest run in Qualifing, runs at open`s don`t count on average`s, only runs of 1.20 under get you hp.. Tom __________________ Tom Moock 5704 STK

07-12-2012, 12:53 AM	#26
Frank Bialas Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: NJ Posts: 249 Likes: 2 Liked 19 Times in 12 Posts	Re: New HP UP [QUOTE=Randy Loge;334942 Now if we could just get them to give back some "luv" to the 70 GTX 440 6 Pak!!! 417 hp is REDICULOUS!!!!!![/QUOTE] Looks like they are loving the 1970 ROADRUNNER, but it should apply to the 1970 GTX also even though shipping weights are different and the 1970 ROADRUNNER was previously classified as a natural A car. __________________ Frank Bialas 1570 STK Last edited by Frank Bialas; 07-12-2012 at 12:57 AM.

07-12-2012, 01:40 PM	#28
Doug McCue Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 232 Likes: 7 Liked 13 Times in 2 Posts	Re: New HP UP there is more added

07-12-2012, 09:03 PM	#30
Doug McCue Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 232 Likes: 7 Liked 13 Times in 2 Posts	Re: New HP UP Where is the run data used for these purposes located? And can anyone view the numbers?