HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2011, 02:03 PM   #11
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Quote:
Originally Posted by R J Sledge View Post
Ed

Its for support and strength, not weight loss. Hope you have your problem fixed

RJ
Sorry R J. Didn't get that. I don't have enough power to need one. LOL
I can see a stick needing that.

Won't know if it's fixed until Friday.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2011, 12:49 AM   #12
Phillip marvetz
Senior Member
 
Phillip marvetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lynden ,WA
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Well, lets see. I have a magnesium 8 3/4 housing from the 70's, I think that will be legal,LOL. Or maybe the Dana 44 aluminum center from a Jeep will work,. Jack asses!
__________________
2009 V/SA Record Holder
Phillip marvetz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 08:08 AM   #13
Chris DeGidio
Member
 
Chris DeGidio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 364
Likes: 8
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

The ONLY reason I can think that they are doing this for is to prevent the Mopar racers from using the V-10 Drag Pak unit in older cars,as it has a production 9" "aftermarket" rear end.Just a thought.

But to me I don't see the advantage of disallowing any aluminum OE style center section in stock,there is no performance gain.
__________________
Nautilus Racing
Chris DeGidio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 03:23 PM   #14
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Not sure why we have to keep the HVAC controls in the dash either. Guess they feel like they have to draw lines somewhere.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 04:22 PM   #15
Mark Faul
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tacoma,WA
Posts: 341
Likes: 2
Liked 43 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris DeGidio View Post
The ONLY reason I can think that they are doing this for is to prevent the Mopar racers from using the V-10 Drag Pak unit in older cars,as it has a production 9" "aftermarket" rear end.Just a thought.

But to me I don't see the advantage of disallowing any aluminum OE style center section in stock,there is no performance gain.
I'm no chassis guy, but doesn't using an aluminum center reduce unsprung weight? Seems like a performance gain to me...
Mark Faul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 07:33 PM   #16
Ken Miele
Live Reporter
 
Ken Miele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,555
Likes: 345
Liked 13,006 Times in 1,223 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Faul View Post
I'm no chassis guy, but doesn't using an aluminum center reduce unsprung weight? Seems like a performance gain to me...

Mark your kidding aren't you? If not, let me
enlighten you, back to back there was no difference.

I guess being a traveling pro like yourself, $800 is just a drop in the bucket.
Ken Miele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 08:11 PM   #17
Mark Faul
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tacoma,WA
Posts: 341
Likes: 2
Liked 43 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Miele View Post

Mark your kidding aren't you? If not, let me
enlighten you, back to back there was no difference.

I guess being a traveling pro like yourself, $800 is just a drop in the bucket.
Not hardly Ken. $800 is a fill up of diesel. As a traveling pro, $800 is hard to come by!
Mark Faul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 08:16 PM   #18
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 52
Liked 724 Times in 177 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris DeGidio View Post
But to me I don't see the advantage of disallowing any aluminum OE style center section in stock,there is no performance gain.
If there is no performance gain, then what's the beef?? Run the iron one, it's cheaper. As for Ken buying the aluminum pieces and there is no performance gain, why do it? The aluminum housings are more hassle and more expensive.
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 08:35 PM   #19
Ken Miele
Live Reporter
 
Ken Miele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,555
Likes: 345
Liked 13,006 Times in 1,223 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Mark, my statement about a traveling pro was misinforming, just as your statement was. I figured it was well deserved.

Dwight, I don't think you realize that Mopar was paying contingency, this is one reason why Mopar guys were using them.

I like them because it makes the gear change much easier, there is no hassle with aluminum. As far as being more expensive, they are the same price, unless you put a stock one in.

When I got my car back it already had an aluminum center section in it, and came with a spare. Its not just a matter of choosing steel or aluminum, the money has already be spent by me and many racers.

The rule is misleading and needs to be changed, its that simple.
Ken Miele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 09:22 PM   #20
SS Engine Guy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??

Anytime you can move weight around there is an advantage somewhere. The closer the car/suspension is to optimum the more the little things matter. I can move 5 pounds from side to side and tell a slight difference in the leave. That really surprised me back about 15 years ago when a chassis builder told me to buy a good set of scales and taught me how to monitor the car's shocks, springs, etc. and keep records.
With that said, it may be more important in a 4 link car than a stocker chassis but some allowments in stock chassis bars are pretty advanced these days. It also brings up the point of "why did it take this many years to clarify a rule (and make it available in easy to understand terms) that many have taken advantage of and set records, won races, went thru indy tech with"? I wouldn't have thought twice about Ken's center section legal or not after reading the wording in the rule book. And I have personally seen MUCH greater infractions get told "have it fixed by next race".
Some would be shocked to see the many uses of stellite and titanium in some race cars. Remember the term "stronger than steal....lighter than aluminum.

And with what is being allowed as stock in todays factory produced "race cars", i really don't think the new clearer ruling is exactly right. But thats just my opinion.

Last edited by SS Engine Guy; 04-09-2011 at 09:28 PM. Reason: edit
SS Engine Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.