HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-10-2011, 05:00 PM   #31
Paul Wong
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 367
Likes: 94
Liked 379 Times in 72 Posts
Default Re: Fly Weights

The D4B is not on the list. Only the LD4B which is a later manifold. There are all sorts of mainfold numbers listed if you look. When i built the car there was no manifold number listed. Another racer got this through and with the 283 getting a 300hp manifold which picked those cars up huge I dont see the harm at this point. We are going to whine ourselves into extinction shortly. In light of all of the other bogus vehicles as a whole that are out there, this is a dead issue and has no effect on anyone as my valiant on its best day wont come within 6 - 7 tenths of the 281 cobra jet and my car has had everything possible thrown at it.
Paul Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 05:35 PM   #32
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 52
Liked 724 Times in 177 Posts
Default Re: Fly Weights

Paul -
You have to know that I'm not whining. It's just that if that manifold is accepted, then it should be published so everybody can use it. Without the documentation, it will be hard to get it through tech in some divisions. I believe the original casting number in the LD4B from MoPar was 2836139. I don't know that MoPar ever offered the D4B with a factory casting number. I wish it were accepted for all the 273s, not just the '65.

Last edited by Dwight Southerland; 08-10-2011 at 05:38 PM.
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 05:42 PM   #33
Paul Wong
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 367
Likes: 94
Liked 379 Times in 72 Posts
Default Re: Fly Weights

The D4B and many LD4B manifolds either have no part number or partial numbers so beware on that one. It should be applied 65 - 67 but like I said I had nothing to do with it getting it approved. The combination is an interesting and promising but is certainly no dime rocket let me tell you that from experience.
Paul Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 07:26 PM   #34
danny waters sr
VIP Member
 
danny waters sr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking Re: Fly Weights

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Wong View Post
The D4B is not on the list. Only the LD4B which is a later manifold. There are all sorts of mainfold numbers listed if you look. When i built the car there was no manifold number listed. Another racer got this through and with the 283 getting a 300hp manifold which picked those cars up huge I dont see the harm at this point. We are going to whine ourselves into extinction shortly. In light of all of the other bogus vehicles as a whole that are out there, this is a dead issue and has no effect on anyone as my valiant on its best day wont come within 6 - 7 tenths of the 281 cobra jet and my car has had everything possible thrown at it.
Now if they would just let us have the carb to go with that 283 intake
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340"
danny waters sr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 08:01 PM   #35
Frank Castros
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2,154
Liked 2,080 Times in 769 Posts
Default Re: Fly Weights

Paul,
Do you know what intake is on Bushmaker's car?
Frank Castros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2013, 10:43 AM   #36
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 3,096
Liked 6,789 Times in 1,524 Posts
Default Re: Fly Weights

With all of the recently de-factored FFFFord 302s starting to hit the tracks, maybe it's time to take another look at the flyweights. Maybe it's time to take another look at some other mid 70s combos that have been given HP and were never competitive too! It would seem to me that the 302 thing should open up some doors to get HP back on a bunch of 304s, 318s, 305s, 307s and maybe even some 289s and 283s with 2V carbs.
Maybe some well-placed e-mails to Pat C could do the trick!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

World's greatest Under-Achiever!
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2013, 11:21 AM   #37
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Fly Weights

Great thread ....Accentuates the weakness/strength of the tech guide. SOOO many combos no chance of successful tech evaluations to set the standards for HP etc. Really fun to dream up unknowns and be a high qualifier for low budget.

Last edited by Dick Butler; 11-28-2013 at 11:26 AM.
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2013, 11:46 AM   #38
Robert Swartz
Senior Member
 
Robert Swartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Fly Weights

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
With all of the recently de-factored FFFFord 302s starting to hit the tracks, maybe it's time to take another look at the flyweights. Maybe it's time to take another look at some other mid 70s combos that have been given HP and were never competitive too! It would seem to me that the 302 thing should open up some doors to get HP back on a bunch of 304s, 318s, 305s, 307s and maybe even some 289s and 283s with 2V carbs.
Maybe some well-placed e-mails to Pat C could do the trick!
I now have one of the FFFFord 302's. This needs to happen. Lower the HP on all those engines. Give these old cars a new life. How many cars are setting in peoples driveway, carport, garage that with some tweeking, would make "great" race cars. Of course, what we are considering a race car and what many others see, is a different animal. Might just allow some new people to get into Stock! I see a new run on the Salvage Yard's.

I purely stumbled into the 78 Mustang II, otherwise it would have never been on my radar. Just hope I'm smart enough to ferret out some of it's potential. Even with a soft combo, still have to learn how to make it work. Last time I messed with a SBF was the same year this car was sold new. OTOH, sure would be a hoot to start seeing a boatload of these types of cars show up at the track.

Speaking to bringing back Modified Production. Sounds like a great idea. Who could afford it? I couldn't 35 years ago. Just like Super Modified, the ship sailed long ago. You could resurrect the class but only those with very deep pockets could compete.
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro
95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock
Robert Swartz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2013, 01:13 PM   #39
james schaechter
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 1,069
Liked 1,212 Times in 249 Posts
Default Re: Fly Weights

Pretty light combo is the 327 275 hp 66 Nova in D stick 2775. We can make weight, well maybe not after thanksgiving....
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK
james schaechter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2013, 03:50 PM   #40
Bob Bender
VIP Member
 
Bob Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1,403
Liked 372 Times in 80 Posts
Default Re: Fly Weights

Penny is driving your old E/FS Sunbird @2295.
__________________
Bob Bender 144 O/SA
2010-2012 National Record Holder
Bob Bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.